Hi,
> > /etc/mount -o port=3049,intr localhost:/null /crypt
>
> What machine are you doing this on?? FreeBSD has no /etc/mount?
Correct. I've used the sbin/mount of course, this is just a cut'n'paste
of the documentation.
Martin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscr
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
> /etc/mount -o port=3049,intr localhost:/null /crypt
What machine are you doing this on?? FreeBSD has no /etc/mount?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:35:33 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> This should made cfs working again, please test the patch.
>
> http://home.teleport.ch/freebsd/mount_nfs.c.diff
No, but bad effects are changed. There is no error diagnostic happens but
mount hangs forever instead (I try several t
This should made cfs working again, please test the patch.
http://home.teleport.ch/freebsd/mount_nfs.c.diff
Martin
Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider
Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland
I'll go to bed now.
It's not cfsd which does this. My update of mount_nfs (and syncing
source with NetBSD) broke this. I'll change mount_nfs so this works
again. There is no need for mount_nfs to register nfs within rpcbind
if port=0.
Sorry that this last so long to detect.
Martin
Martin Blap
I'm fixing now the code ... We have to use now Solaris code part and
add #if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined (__SOLARIS2X__) ifdef's and also
fill out this:
/* Assign the local bind address and type of service */
tp->xp_ltaddr = tres->addr;
tp->xp_type = tinfo.servtype;
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 00:49:33 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> > Breaking nfs from working on user defined ports is a step backwards and
> > should be fixed. Lots of people run nfsd and cfsd at the same time.
>
> No, you understand me wrong, the way this is done is bogus. If you set
> -DCFS_PO
> Breaking nfs from working on user defined ports is a step backwards and
> should be fixed. Lots of people run nfsd and cfsd at the same time.
No, you understand me wrong, the way this is done is bogus. If you set
-DCFS_PORT=3049 like it is done at the moment and use nc instead of NULL
it work
Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> here is what I found:
>
> notes.ms, line 228
>
> If your system does not support NFS mounts on ports other
> than 2049, add -DCFS_PORT=2049; you will not be able to simultaneously
> run the target system as an NFS server under this configuration.
>
> cfs.h:#def
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 00:33:28 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
>
> If you compile with -DCFS_PORT=2049, cfs works as normal.
>
It sounds like in that case it is impossible to run nfsd and cfsd at the
same machine, i.e. does cfs disallows nfs?
BTW, why it works before?
--
Andrey A. Chernov
h
Ok,
here is what I found:
notes.ms, line 228
If your system does not support NFS mounts on ports other
than 2049, add -DCFS_PORT=2049; you will not be able to simultaneously
run the target system as an NFS server under this configuration.
cfs.h:#define CFS_PORT 2049
nfsproto.h:#define NF
* Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010322 15:00] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see, seems that (port==2049? nc : NULL) has changed in some way.
> I'll fix that.
>
> PS: let's change to private discussion and not cc current anymore.
Please don't, I'd like to understand what's going on here.
There's al
Hi,
I see, seems that (port==2049? nc : NULL) has changed in some way.
I'll fix that.
PS: let's change to private discussion and not cc current anymore.
Martin
Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider
Zur
Hmm, look at this:
# mount /crypt
mount_nfs: rpcbind on server: RPC: Program not registered
rpcbind debug output:
PMAP_GETPORT req for (13, 2, udp) from 127.0.0.1.3.18 :port = 0
nfs is prgramm 13
For some strange reason there is a request for nfs.
Martin
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 01:35:12 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 23:32:53 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> > # nfsd
>
> ^
>
> Not start nfsd - it is unneded for cfs, cfs handle all calls by itself.
> At least it works without any nfsd previously.
I.e. you have s
Without nfsd it doesn't work, right.
Yes, this seems to be the problem. I'll go into source of cfs now and fix
the problem. Or maybe a mount_nfs problem ?
Martin
Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider
Zu
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 23:32:53 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
> # nfsd
^
Not start nfsd - it is unneded for cfs, cfs handle all calls by itself.
At least it works without any nfsd previously.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
Hmm ?
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/cfsd.sh stop
# killall mountd
# killall -SIGUSR1 nfsd
# killall rpcbind
# rpcinfo
rpcinfo: can't contact rpcbind: RPC: Remote system error - Connection refused
# rpcbind -i
# mountd -2
# nfsd
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/cfsd.sh start
# mount_nfs -o port=3049,intr,nfsv2 lo
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 23:07:08 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> It seems you have to run rpcbind with -i flag:
>
-i not helps too. Diagnostic is the same.
>
> # mount_nfs -o port=3049,intr localhost:/null /crypt
You miss "nfsv2" switch here. mountd is running with -2 option too.
To make te
It seems you have to run rpcbind with -i flag:
-i ``insecure'' mode. Allows calls to SET and UNSET from an
host. Normally rpcbind accepts these requests only from the
loopback interface for security reasons. This change is necessary for
programs that were compiled with earlier versions o
20 matches
Mail list logo
