On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 00:49:33 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > Breaking nfs from working on user defined ports is a step backwards and > > should be fixed. Lots of people run nfsd and cfsd at the same time. > > No, you understand me wrong, the way this is done is bogus. If you set > -DCFS_PORT=3049 like it is done at the moment and use nc instead of NULL > it works. To have a NULL nc entry is not correct in tirpc. So the question is: why cfsd attempts to register with NULL netconfig for ports != 2049? What it wants to obtain by such move? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Peter Wemm
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap David O'Brien
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Martin Blapp
- Re: CFS - Portmap Andrey A. Chernov