On 06/28/10 18:56, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi again,
After my most recent appeal for testers, I received some excellent
feedback and thank everyone that has tried the patch. I've ironed out a
couple of bugs and have what I hope is the import-ready candidate patch
available for a final round of t
Hi again,
After my most recent appeal for testers, I received some excellent
feedback and thank everyone that has tried the patch. I've ironed out a
couple of bugs and have what I hope is the import-ready candidate patch
available for a final round of testing.
Please read on if you are able
On 06/22/10 04:52, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS
enabled, so I'll try to enable them ne
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote:
> >
> > On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >
> >> Fabian Keil wrote:
> >>
> >>> Fabian Keil wrote:
> >>
> My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS
> enabled, so I'll try to enable them next.
On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS
enabled, so I'll try to enable them next.
The culprit seem to be non-default KTR settings in the kernel
On 06/21/10 00:12, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
Taking pf (and altq) out of the picture doesn't seem to make
a difference.
Wouldn't have expected it to. Will be very curious to know if the panic
is triggered in GENE
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Fabian Keil wrote:
>
>> Fabian Keil wrote:
>
>>> My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS
>>> enabled, so I'll try to enable them next.
>>
>> The culprit seem to be non-default KTR settings in the kernel
>> while loading alq
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Fabian Keil wrote:
> > My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS
> > enabled, so I'll try to enable them next.
>
> The culprit seem to be non-default KTR settings in the kernel
> while loading alq as a module.
Actually whether or not alq is loaded as a
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>
> > On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > > Taking pf (and altq) out of the picture doesn't seem to make
> > > a difference.
> >
> > Wouldn't have expected it to. Will be very curious to know if the panic
> > is triggered in GENERIC.
>
> It
On 06/20/10 23:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartwrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >>> Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >>>
> On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Lawrence Stewartwrote:
> >
> >> On 06/13/10 18:12, Law
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartwrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external testing
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >>> Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >>>
> On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >>>
> > The time has come to solicit some external testing for
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unles
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >
> >>> The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
> >>> I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are
>
Hi Fabian,
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered.
I'm interested in all fee
Hi Fabian,
Thank you for the the report. This is indeed an issue I've never seen
before and exactly the sort of thing I wanted to uncover.
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>
> > On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>
> > > The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
> > > I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are
> > > discovered.
>
> > > I'm interested in all fe
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> > The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
> > I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered.
> > I'm interested in all feedback and reports of success/failure, along
Hi Lev,
On 06/19/10 16:26, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lawrence.
You wrote 19 июня 2010 г., 07:27:30:
Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada
I wanted to help you, but here is one problem: I dont have any
traffic-loaded 9-CURRENT machines. I have some not-so-critica
Hello, Lawrence.
You wrote 19 июня 2010 г., 07:27:30:
> Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada
I wanted to help you, but here is one problem: I dont have any
traffic-loaded 9-CURRENT machines. I have some not-so-critical 7.x and
8.x machines with noticeable traffic (f
Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada
*sings "I'm so ronery" in his best Kim Jong-il voice* [4]
Just like Uncle Sam [5], Uncle Lawrence needs you too - yes, I'm
pointing at YOU!
More specifically, people out there running current with 10-15 mins to
spare for some testing, p
22 matches
Mail list logo
