Hi Lev,
On 06/19/10 16:26, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lawrence.
You wrote 19 июня 2010 г., 07:27:30:
Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada
I wanted to help you, but here is one problem: I dont have any
traffic-loaded 9-CURRENT machines. I have some not-so-critical 7.x and
8.x machines with noticeable traffic (for example, my torrent box
still run 7-STABLE), but no 9-CURRENT except VMWare on my desktop :(
I think, it is common case: 9-CURRENT machines are developers one,
without noticeable amount of network traffic and all traffic-loaded
machines run more stable versions.
Right now the traffic load of the test machine is not really all that
important to the testing. As long as the module loads, logs some
coherent looking data whilst enabled and unloads across a range of
different hardware and kernel archs, I'll be happy. SIFTR will be
backported to 8 and possibly 7 also, so there will be plenty of time to
get people with more heavily loaded systems running stable branches to
join in testing.
This is the first real push I've made to get the code widely tested, so
I wouldn't feel comfortable asking people to run it on
(semi-)production, stable branch systems yet. If you're really keen to
help test it and you wouldn't be worried about running the code on such
a system, I would be happy to create a 7 and/or 8 backport of the
required bits. Otherwise, I'm happy to get the initial round of
9-CURRENT only testing feedback, commit it to head and then revisit once
it's settled and time to merge it back to the stable branches.
Cheers,
Lawrence
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
