On 29/05/2018 02:06, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:04:11 -0600, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 05/28/18 15:37, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
>>> Suddenly the site www.secnetix.de/olli/FreeBSD/svnews which showed
>>> sequential
>>> source as for example xx1966 on april 3
On 09/09/2014 17:56, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Anders Bolt Evensen wrote:
>
>> On 05.09.14 19:37, John Nielsen wrote:
>>> On Sep 5, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:20:21AM -0600, John Nielsen wrote:
> I have a "MacBook Pro Reti
On 23/10/2013 18:35, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> If there are drivers that people absolutely need fixed then they should
>> stand up and say "hey, I really would like X to work better!" and then
>> follow it up with some encouraging incentives. Righ
Please use freebsd-test for testing
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-test
Vince
On 08/10/2013 23:00, Joe Nosay wrote:
> What were you testing?
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>> /div>> class="utdU2e">> id=":2il" tabindex="-1">test>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 8
On 10/09/2013 14:25, Maciej Milewski wrote:
> On 10.09.2013 14:33, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> root@bsdpkgbuild:~ # racoonctl show-sa ipsec
>> send: Bad file descriptor
>> l
>> I did try stating racoon under truss and using racoon -F -d -d -d but
>> didnt see i
On 10/09/2013 09:18, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>
>> I thought I'd have a play with ipsec since its been a while since I last
>> set it up, and was setting up a transport mode connection between my
>> poudiere/repo server (th
I thought I'd have a play with ipsec since its been a while since I last
set it up, and was setting up a transport mode connection between my
poudiere/repo server (the -curent server) and another box (8.2-RELEASE)
3 pings later the -CURRENT box froze, its zfs on root so no kernel dump
I'm afraid, i
On 20/02/2013 11:09, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> From mexas Thu Feb 14 09:51:50 2013
> To: freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
> Subject: daily otput: rejected mail hosts?
> Reply-To: me...@bristol.ac.uk
>
> I see in the daily output:
>
> Checking for rejected mail hos
On 19/10/2012 15:39, Alex Keda wrote:
> On 10.10.2012 17:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
>> concerned by the announce.
>>
>> As nvidia-drivers has been fixed and is now properly working with pkgng, the
>> ports
On 10/10/2012 20:50, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 19:35, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> Am 10.10.2012 19:14, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
>>> On 10/10/2012 15:07, O. Hartmann wrote:
Is ports-mgmt/portmaster now dealing with pkgng?
>>>
>>> Not yet. bdrewery has taken over the portmaster port and pk
On 08/08/2012 13:39, Alisson wrote:
> Hi...
>
> everybody knows the stability of freebsd... but... and the protocol ECMP?
> its a dream?
I havent tried but google says
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/089956.html
Its in since 2008
Vince
> to use 2 routes with diferent gatew
On 23/07/2012 09:43, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that "pkg2ng" is involving
> the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
> also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
> the tool completely depe
On 19/07/2012 13:36, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> PS Re ext2:
> I'm looking for an equivalent of mkfs_ext2, any suggestions ? Ports maybe ?
sounds like you want sysutils/e2fsprogs
ext2/3/4 mkfs/fsck etc. I believe.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing l
On 09/07/2012 02:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Vincent Hoffman:
>> On 08/07/2012 00:26, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>
>>>> I'm afraid this didnt make any real difference for me.
>>>> Since I cou
On 09/07/2012 02:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Vincent Hoffman:
>> On 08/07/2012 00:26, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>
>>>> I'm afraid this didnt make any real difference for me.
>>>> Since I cou
On 07/07/2012 13:26, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 01/07/2012 12:18, Rick Macklem wrote:
>> Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>>> On 01/07/2012 01:53, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>>> To modify mountd to use the kernel changes is more work than I have
>>>> time for, in part be
On 08/07/2012 00:26, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> I'm afraid this didnt make any real difference for me.
>> Since I couldnt test it on the live system I tried it on a test vm.
>> on the vm (nfs server) I set a loopin
On 01/07/2012 12:18, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> On 01/07/2012 01:53, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> To modify mountd to use the kernel changes is more work than I have
>>> time for, in part because mountd.c is a very ugly old piece of C
>>> code,
On 02/07/2012 13:05, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 12:13:30PM +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> On 01/07/2012 01:53, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> I haven't looked at Andrey's patch, but conceptually it sounds like
>>> the best approach. As I unde
On 01/07/2012 01:53, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> Just a note to say I have tested this on -CURRENT with the new nfs
>> server and it is still the case.
>>
>> On the client (FreeBSD seaurchin 8.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3
>> #0: Tue Jun 1
On 27/06/2012 16:27, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> Hi,
> After only one off-list reply from the author of kern/136865 (see below)
> after asking -questions, I thought it worth asking -CURRENT.
> Basically:
>
> I seem to have run into the problems described in this old thread.
> htt
Hi,
After only one off-list reply from the author of kern/136865 (see below)
after asking -questions, I thought it worth asking -CURRENT.
Basically:
I seem to have run into the problems described in this old thread.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-April/044927.html
tl:dr
Hi,
Just a quick ping to make sure this isnt forgotten. Would it help
if I open a PR?
regards,
Vince
On 21/06/2012 19:34, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:41:59 pm Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> The 2nd patch (to if.h and if_gif.c)
Hi again,
The 2nd patch (to if.h and if_gif.c) also fixes the
panic on boot.
Thanks for the quick response as ever.
Vince
On 20/06/2012 13:12, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 8:05:36 pm Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> Full dump info at http://unsane.co.uk/cr
The patch to gif.c does fix it.
I'll try the second patch later when I get a chance.
Thanks,
Vince
On 20/06/2012 13:12, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 8:05:36 pm Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> Full dump info at http://unsane.co.uk/crash
>> It seems to have poppe
Full dump info at http://unsane.co.uk/crash
It seems to have popped up between r236905 (working kernel) and r237264
(this panic)
the gif config I have in rc.conf is for a HE ipv6 tunnel
cloned_interfaces="gif0"
ifconfig_gif0="tunnel 85.233.185.162 216.66.80.26"
ifconfig_gif0_ipv6="inet6 2001:470:
On 16/04/2012 03:31, Fbsd8 wrote:
>
>
> OK I have uncovered what the problem is.
> The pf version running on Freebsd 9.0 matches the version running on
> openbsd 4.5. Found it on man pf at the end.
>
> The documentation on the Openbsd website for pf is for Openbsd 5.0 and
> it has warning saying "N
On 21/03/2012 10:47, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 21.03.2012 14:09, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
>> You would need to modify UFS, or maybe do something like CFS[1]. CFS works
>> as an NFS server and you could modify it to only cipher the needed files.
>>
>> Also you could write a simple FS on FUSE, b
On 15/02/2012 10:33, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello.
> Accidentally, I managed to kill my libc.so.7 and didn't make a backup.
> Now my FreeBSD 10/amd64 box, compiled yesterday's world last time,
> refuses to do anything since login doesn't work. /bin/sh is missing a
> symbol, I forgot the name, it was
On 28/12/2011 06:30, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/27/2011 22:08, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why not just list the things that sysinstall did that people like, and
>> extract out / reimplement those bits?
> That's sounds great. As soon as that's done, we can remove sysinstall
> from the base. Un
On 23/12/2011 20:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> On 23/12/2011 02:56, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> There is a wiki page http://wiki.freebsd.org/SystemTuning which is
>> currently more or less tuning(7) with some annotations,
On 23/12/2011 02:56, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:44:14AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
while the discussion continued here, some work started at some oth
On 20/12/2011 10:39, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 20.12.11 11:42, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream
>> source says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I
>> get my images from.
>
> Relying on checksums that are publish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2011 13:47, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
>> issue. And yes, there are cases where SCHED_ULE shows much better
>> performance then SCHED_4BSD. [...]
>
> Do we have any proof at ha
On 27/10/2011 11:22, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I just finished the upgrade from source from 9.0-BETA2 to RC1, and I find two
> problems.
>
> First, I lost my users; nonroot user names are not recognized, if for
> instance I type
>
> passwd arlene
>
> I already tried to login as arlene with old pass
On 14/10/2011 19:58, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>> > 3. PF doesn't expire state. The state table on my older host (pre
>> >OpenBSD-4.5) has the following stats:
>> >
>> >Status: Enabled for 0 days 00:37:17 Debug: Urgent
>> >State Table Total Ra
On 10/09/2011 18:06, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:33:37 +0100 Veniamin Gvozdikov wrote:
>
>> I've tried porting a few programs from Linux which's used a
>> linuxulator. But I have the problem with old linux base system. My
>> ports can't be run with old libstdc++.so.6
>> I have e
On 06/09/2011 09:44, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> But sadly they seem to be gone from the FTP servers. The system has
>> beside its harddisks only a floppy drive (no space for a CD-ROM) so
>> I would need the memstick image
>> Any idea where I could get FreeBSD-9.0-BETA1-amd64-memstick.img from?
>
On 06/08/2011 17:05, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 15:48, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>> On 08/05/11 10:58, Lars Engels wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34P
On 06/08/2011 15:48, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 08/05/11 10:58, Lars Engels wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:01AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
On 04/03/2011 20:24, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
> wrote:
>> BSDinstall has acquired at this point its final form (prior to a future
>> merge with pc-sysinstall), and I believe is ready to replace sysinstall on
>> the 9.0 snapshot ISOs. Barring any objec
On 19/11/2010 12:42, Eric Masson wrote:
> Bruce Cran writes:
>
> Hello,
>
>> Google suggests that the work was a GSoC project in 2005 on a pluggable
>> disk scheduler.
> It seems that something similar has found its way in DFlyBSD, dsched.
And indeed to FreeBSD, man gsched. Added sometime round Ap
On 28/10/2010 12:49, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Basically, this is a call for help in working on fusefs. There are
> several developers and users willing to do testing and such but no
> available developers with their hands in the guts of VFS to squash the
> buried bugs. Fusefs might be especi
On 25/06/2010 17:32, Daisuke Aoyama wrote:
> Sorry, isboot-0.1.1 was broken under i386 kernel + loader.
> The version 0.1.2 is uploaded in my blog.
> Also I uploaded isboot integrated FreeBSD 7.3 disc1, 8.1-RC1 dics1 and
> making script. Use at your own risk.
>
> You need only iBFT supported NIC an
44 matches
Mail list logo
