Re: devd in r329188M don't start

2018-02-15 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 13/02/2018 23:50, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 02/13/18 10:47, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >> +1 >> >> My USB mouse was working fine before the switch to devmatch. Now I >> have to 'kldload ums' manually. >> >> Same for USB audio, snd_uaudio.ko was loaded by devd before. >> > > Hi, > > This is a

[SOLVED] Re: Deterministic rescue buildworld error with custom make.conf/src.conf/MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX

2017-03-11 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 12/03/2017 13:37, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sun, 2017-03-12 at 13:27 +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> On 12/03/2017 10:29, Ian Lepore wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 2017-03-12 at 10:22 +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi

Re: Deterministic rescue buildworld error with custom make.conf/src.conf/MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX

2017-03-11 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Ian, On 12/03/2017 10:29, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sun, 2017-03-12 at 10:22 +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm unable to complete buildworld with 2 recent svn revs I've tried >> (r314838 and r315059). I'm building for a slightly resource

Deterministic rescue buildworld error with custom make.conf/src.conf/MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX

2017-03-11 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi all, I'm unable to complete buildworld with 2 recent svn revs I've tried (r314838 and r315059). I'm building for a slightly resource constrained production system so am specifying custom settings and a different obj tree location so I can copy it to the target system. The error persists after a

Re: Instant panic while trying run ports-mgmt/poudriere

2015-08-27 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 08/23/15 22:54, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:08:16PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 09:54:28AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> On 12/08/2015 17:11, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >>>> On 08/07/15 07:33,

Re: Instant panic while trying run ports-mgmt/poudriere

2015-08-27 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 08/27/15 17:15, Don Lewis wrote: > On 27 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 27 Aug, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >>> On 08/27/15 09:36, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >>>> Andriy Gapon wrote this message on Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 09:54 +0300: >>>>> On 12/08/2015 17:11,

Re: Instant panic while trying run ports-mgmt/poudriere

2015-08-26 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 08/27/15 09:36, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Andriy Gapon wrote this message on Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 09:54 +0300: >> On 12/08/2015 17:11, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >>> On 08/07/15 07:33, Pawel Pekala wrote: >>>> Hi K., >>>> >>>> On 2015-08

Re: Instant panic while trying run ports-mgmt/poudriere

2015-08-12 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 08/07/15 07:33, Pawel Pekala wrote: > Hi K., > > On 2015-08-06 12:33 -0700, "K. Macy" wrote: >> Is this still happening? > > Still crashes: +1 for me running r286617 Cheers, Lawrence ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: Panic @r251745; i386, early in boot sequence

2013-06-14 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/15/13 02:35, David Wolfskill wrote: > Here's a hand-transcribed copy of the backtrace: > > ... Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec panic: curvnet is NULL cpuid > = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self_wrapper(c1034c40,c102a482,c11b646c,c2020cbc,c1037f21,...) > at 0xc051283d = db_trace_sel

Read-triggered corruption of swap backed MD devices

2013-05-23 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi all, I tracked the cause of a colleague's nanobsd image creation problem to what appears to be some nasty behaviour with swap-backed MD devices. I've verified the behaviour exists on three separate systems running 10-CURRENT r250260, 9-STABLE r250824 and 9-STABLE r250925. The following minimal

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-09 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 02/10/12 11:52, Eitan Adler wrote: > In conf/160689 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160689) > there has been some discussion about changing the default cshrc file. > > I'd like to commit something like the following based on Chris's patch > at the end of the thread. This post is an

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-27 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 12/28/11 06:29, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/27/2011 03:48, Lawrence Stewart wrote: On the topic of Doug's actual question, I see minimal sense in resurrecting sysinstall in head now. I would suggest it be done much closer to (say, 6 months before) the 10.0 release cycle, if no suitable

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-27 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 12/27/11 16:13, Ron McDowell wrote: Doug Barton wrote: The story so far ... sysinstall was removed from HEAD in October. I (and others) objected on the basis that at this time there is no replacement for the post-install configuration role that sysinstall played. More sysinstall components w

Re: quick summary results with ixgbe (was Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

2011-12-08 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:59:43AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 06.12.2011 22:06, Luigi Rizzo wrote: ... Even in my experiments there is a lot of instability in the results. I don't know exactly where the problem is, but the high number of read syscall

Re: 9.0-RC1 panic in tcp_input: negative winow.

2011-10-27 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 10/26/11 22:53, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 3:54:31 am Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 08:14:22AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, October 23, 2011 11:58:28 am Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:44:45AM +0300, Kostik Belousov

Re: 9.0-RC1 panic in tcp_input: negative winow.

2011-10-22 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 10/22/11 19:49, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: The panic message says: panic: tcp_input negative window: tp 0xfe007763e000 rcv_nxt 3718269252 rcv_adv 3718268291 I only have picture of the backtrace: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/misc/panic_negative_window.jpg ewww that

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2011-03-29 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 11/13/10 20:34, Alexander Motin wrote: > Brandon Gooch wrote: >> 2010/11/5 Alexander Motin : >>> Hi. >>> >>> I've reviewed tests that scgcheck does to SCSI subsystem. It shown >>> combination of several issues in both CAM, ahci(4) and cdrtools itself. >>> Several small patches allow us to pass m

Re: [HEADS UP] Significant TCP work committed to head - CUBIC & H-TCP committed

2010-12-02 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Ivan, On 12/03/10 00:07, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 12/02/10 12:53, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > >> For the really interested (by now I suspect my audience is down to 0, >> but still), you might want to load siftr and enable/disable it during >> each test run and make your

Re: [HEADS UP] Significant TCP work committed to head - CUBIC & H-TCP committed

2010-12-02 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 11/12/10 20:35, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Hi All, > > A quick note that this evening, I made the first in a series of upcoming > commits to head that modify the TCP stack fairly significantly. I have > no reason to believe you'll notice any issues, but TCP is a comp

Re: [HEADS UP] Significant TCP work committed to head - VIMAGE users

2010-11-16 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 11/12/10 20:35, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Hi All, > > A quick note that this evening, I made the first in a series of upcoming > commits to head that modify the TCP stack fairly significantly. I have > no reason to believe you'll notice any issues, but TCP is a comp

Re: [HEADS UP] Significant TCP work committed to head

2010-11-12 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 11/13/10 04:58, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:35:45 +1100 >> From: Lawrence Stewart >> Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org >> >> Hi All, >> >> A quick note that this evening, I made the first in a series of upcoming >>

[HEADS UP] Significant TCP work committed to head

2010-11-12 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi All, A quick note that this evening, I made the first in a series of upcoming commits to head that modify the TCP stack fairly significantly. I have no reason to believe you'll notice any issues, but TCP is a complex beast and it's possible things might crop up. The changes are mostly related t

Re: sysctl -a is slow

2010-09-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 09/21/10 00:01, David Xu wrote: > Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> On 09/21/10 02:21, David Xu wrote: >> >>> jhell wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:26, David Xu wrote: >>>> In Message-Id: <4c976f14.8000...@freebsd.org> >&g

Re: sysctl -a is slow

2010-09-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 09/21/10 02:21, David Xu wrote: > jhell wrote: >> >> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:26, David Xu wrote: >> In Message-Id: <4c976f14.8000...@freebsd.org> >> >>> jhell wrote: On 09/19/2010 09:28, David Xu wrote: > just typed sysctl -a on keyboard, and found it is slow, sometimes > it has been

Re: Crash during boot of current (rev 212885)

2010-09-19 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hiya Randall! On 09/20/10 08:56, Randall Stewart wrote: > Hey all: > > I am now seeing a crash when I boot my Intel (in 64 bit more)... > > Its very early in the boot process.. and thus no crash dump ;-0 > > Its in > > netisr_start_swi() > > When it initializes netisr_mtx with a mtx_init() it

Re: amd64 panic snd_hda - hdac_get_capabilities: Invalid corb size (0)

2010-07-27 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 07/27/10 18:09, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:37:49PM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> On 07/27/10 02:07, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>>> On amd64 r210496 I get th

Re: amd64 panic snd_hda - hdac_get_capabilities: Invalid corb size (0)

2010-07-27 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 07/27/10 02:07, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> On amd64 r210496 I get this panic when booting a kernel >> with snd_hda(4). I haven't used this driver before, so >> can't say if this is a regression. >> >> (copied by hand) >> >>

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-07-03 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/28/10 18:56, Lawrence Stewart wrote: Hi again, After my most recent appeal for testers, I received some excellent feedback and thank everyone that has tried the patch. I've ironed out a couple of bugs and have what I hope is the import-ready candidate patch available for a final rou

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-28 Thread Lawrence Stewart
able and willing to (re)test the code. On 06/19/10 13:27, Lawrence Stewart wrote: Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada *sings "I'm so ronery" in his best Kim Jong-il voice* [4] Just like Uncle Sam [5], Uncle Lawrence needs you too - yes, I'm pointing a

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-21 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/22/10 04:52, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote: On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS enabled, so I'll try to e

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote: On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS enabled, so I'll try to enable them next. The culprit seem to be non-default KTR settings in the kernel

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/21/10 00:12, Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote: Taking pf (and altq) out of the picture doesn't seem to make a difference. Wouldn't have expected it to. Will be very curious to know if the panic is tr

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/20/10 23:15, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewartwrote: On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewartwrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: The time has come to solicit some external testing

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool. I'm hoping to commit it within a week

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Fabian, On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool. I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered. I'm interes

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-19 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Fabian, Thank you for the the report. This is indeed an issue I've never seen before and exactly the sort of thing I wanted to uncover. On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: The time has come to solicit some ext

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research

2010-06-19 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Pluknet, On 06/19/10 18:48, pluknet wrote: [snip] Hi. I'm seeing this right after enabling siftr via sysctl and changing ppl. Sorry, if that was already discussed, known or unrelated (since em is in locking chain). lock order reversal: 1st 0x80e51568 PFil hook read/write mutex (PF

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-19 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Lev, On 06/19/10 16:26, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Lawrence. You wrote 19 июня 2010 г., 07:27:30: Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada I wanted to help you, but here is one problem: I dont have any traffic-loaded 9-CURRENT machines. I have some not-so-critica

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-18 Thread Lawrence Stewart
are for some testing, please read on. On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: Hi all, The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool. I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered. SIFTR is a kernel module that logs a range of statistics

[CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research

2010-06-13 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi all, The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool. I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered. SIFTR is a kernel module that logs a range of statistics on active TCP connections to a log file. It provides the ability to make highly g

Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base?

2010-06-10 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/11/10 03:46, John Baldwin wrote: I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections to doing so? More details about how it

Re: [RFC] Macro to sum DPCPU vars

2010-06-10 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/10/10 22:23, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 09 June 2010 11:54:53 pm Lawrence Stewart wrote: Does anyone have objections to or feedback on the following patch? The macro simplifies the act of calculating an aggregate from DPCPU counters. http://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/patches

[RFC] Macro to sum DPCPU vars

2010-06-09 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Does anyone have objections to or feedback on the following patch? The macro simplifies the act of calculating an aggregate from DPCPU counters. http://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/patches/tcp_ffcaia2008/dpcpu_sum_9.x.r208900.patch If anyone is curious how you would use it, take a look at: htt

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-05-31 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: [snip interesting history] I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland. Reading through this discussion, I wanted to draw attention to this footnote in Ja