, before you complain with a problem, go back
and compile your kernel with no more than -O -pipe.
--
Dan Papasian
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"How are we to distinguish the difference between
reality and dream? Dreams result from a relationship
of atoms. So do our bodies."
--
What optimizations did you use when compiling your kernel?
(COPTFLAGS)
If it's anything more than -O -pipe, then that may very well
be your problem.
-Dan
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:28:44PM -0400, Patrick Gardella wrote:
> I've somehow been burned by the config changes when I build world
> yeste
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 05:38:21PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Clive Lin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > - memcpy(name_dir_end + 1, name_dir_end, strlen(name_dir_end) + 1);
> > - *name_dir_end = 'r';
> > + // un-needed.
> > + // memcpy(name_dir_end + 1, name_dir_end, strlen(nam
This would probably be more appropriate on -questions.
I take it the problem started when you updated? Sounds
like you may need to recompile your X server or install
compat3x (the latter is the sane choice)
-Dan
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 11:46:24PM -0400, John Daniels wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I am usin
Eivind Elkund was talking about doing something like
this. He had a pretty nice document about it,
too. If I recall, the name was "OVCS: Open Version Control System"
Perhaps someone could fill in the blanks? I couldn't
find the document at the address I thought it was kept,
http://yes.no/perha
eproduce this on a kernel without SMP enabled?
Perhaps there is a locking issue? However, that'd lead to a panic I'd imagine..
So see if you can reproduce this with one CPU running so we can at least
eliminate one of the variables.
-Dan Papasian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubsc
to a good amount of these questions, there is a good
chance that your processor(s) are overheating. Try improving the airflow to the
case (But using a household fan isn't recommended due to EMI)
-Dan Papasian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 11:50:10PM -0800, Arun Shar
Ah, well, I hadn't picked up that that was the desired behavoir.
Well, it is fixed: http://bugg.strangled.net/which.c
-Dan Papasian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:09:29AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Dan Papasian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000303 04:39
Can you please give an example of where multiple arguments
doesn't work as expected?
It works fine over here.
-Dan Papasian
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 07:59:37PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
--snip--
>
> It doesn't seem to handle multiple arguments. File a PR and fix
>
...I've got the fear of posting the source, but what the heck,
getting nitpicked is good education :)
http://bugg.strangled.net/which.c
Any flames^Wthoughts?
-Dan Papasian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
.
Considering most of us out there, myself included, have fallen madly in love
with ports the way it is, I doubt that the current system won't go away
for a long, long time.
-Dan Papasian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 09:58:06PM +0100, Kai Voigt wrote:
> Hello,
>
&
11 matches
Mail list logo
