Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:15:57AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
...
#6 0xc049f355 in vm_fault (map=0xc6fc1700, vaddr=0, fault_type=1 '\001',
fault_flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:219
#7 0xc04eddd9 in trap_pfault (frame=0xdd699b18, usermode=0, eva=0)
at /usr/src/sy
default (or
perhaps even default) tunable if it were possible and not too
difficult. The problem should likely be addressed given people
might want to create snapshots around the same time they run find
via the maintanence scripts.
--
Adam - Migus Dot Org (http://www.migus.org)
__
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins said:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:49:42PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
>> Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
>> WRT the mime thing. My apologies. It never occured to me as
>> everyone I
>> know personally uses a "real" mail reader. I'd att
eally matter? Would anyone care?
Does anyone like or object to the idea?
My motivation for asking is simply to avoid having to distribute/use
this program with the performance testing stuff as previously
(before I cared about nano-second precision) I just used
/usr/bin/date to generate the datest
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Adam Migus writes:
> Folks,
> While doing some performance analysis (doing make -j5 buildkernel)
> on a set of 14 kernels I've hit one using the SCHED_ULE scheduler
> that hangs. It happens every time but not necessarily in the same
> place in the ma
Bruce M Simpson said:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:09:44PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
>> The hardware is a dual Xeon box. The kernel is SMP w/ SCHED_ULE
>> instead of SCHED_4BSD, the options required for diskless and the
>> following two options:
>>
>> op
tell me _why_ Java 1.4.x only works nicely on
_your_ system when running as root? Hint: ktrace is
your friend.
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
/freebsd/ports/INDEX
0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:ttyp0:amigus$
Perhaps you should try writing a port yourself before
you judge others on whether or not their ports are
released too early or not.
When you get your foot out of your mouth also try using
your full name in your email address too so people can
I have employer supplied hardware and time
slated to perf testing. While I can't get paid to test non
TrustedBSD testing, I can use the hardware (on my own time) to
test. I'm more than happy to do that.
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailab
doing this patch. I'd like to see usbd go away. I'd
like to help devd take it's place.
Adam
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:01:28PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:02:29AM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
> > This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of d
Me too, so if it does require one someone please tell me. I obviously
read the code and from my understanding no locking is fine but I
could be wrong.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:13:31AM -0500, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
>
> :This patch makes usb
This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of devices using a list
instead of the static array of 4 devices. It's implemented as a list
but it's very easy to change.
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trus
ports your card. Once you know, put that one in
your /boot/loader.conf. If your driver requires pcm, the loader
will load it as a dependancy.
Adam
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org)
FreeBSD (http://www
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
>
>> Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get
>> the
>> 'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
>> GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with
>> SMP/
> * De: Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data:
> 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Force 1 CPU on SMP kernel? ]
>> * Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030128 12:50]:
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus
e the 'best' way to make an SMP
kernel only start/use CPU0?
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org)
FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
default kernel, you'd likely have other issues in making
> sysinstall work and have to do custom
> hacking...
>
> Warner
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
Adam Migus
Network Associates Labo
lts as I'm not a VFS guru. Second, if
anyone expresses interest in ownership of the nullfs/unionfs
code, I'd like to work with them. If no one does and someone
wants me to, I may, but at a later date when I'm more
comfortable doing so. Third, if someone else attempts to
find/fix the bug,
18 matches
Mail list logo
