<quote who="Scott Long"> > - Benchmarks and performance testing - Having a source of > reliable and > useful benchmarks is essential to identifying performance > problems and guarding against performance regressions. A > 'performance team' that is made up of people and resources > for formulating, developing, and executing benchmark tests > should be put into place soon. > Comparisons should be made against both FreeBSD 4.x and > Linux 2.4.x. Tests to consider are: > - the classic 'worldstone' > - webstone - /usr/ports/www/webstone > - Fstress - http://www.cs.duke.edu/ari/fstress > - ApacheBench - /usr/ports/www/p5-ApacheBench > - netperf - /usr/ports/benchmarks/netperf
I don't wanna argue about which benchmark is better I just wanna sign up for the team. I do performance testing for the TrustedBSD Project. I have employer supplied hardware and time slated to perf testing. While I can't get paid to test non TrustedBSD testing, I can use the hardware (on my own time) to test. I'm more than happy to do that. -- Adam Migus - Research Scientist Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com) TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org) FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
