FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1674 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1674/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1674/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1674/c
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1673 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1673/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1673/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1673/c
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1672 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1672/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1672/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1672/c
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1671 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1671/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1671/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1671/c
+10 on option 2. Hate to say it, but I'd rather this little corner of
freebsd be "right" before it gets more heavily used.
-a
On 10 November 2016 at 03:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 14/10/2016 18:51, Lewis Donzis wrote:
>> Our opinion doesn’t count for much, but I like 2 or 4. Option 1 would
>
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1670 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1670/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1670/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1670/c
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1669 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1669/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1669/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1669/c
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1668 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1668/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1668/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1668/c
On 14/10/2016 18:51, Lewis Donzis wrote:
> Our opinion doesn’t count for much, but I like 2 or 4. Option 1 would
> essentially obviate the entire purpose of changing the structure. Option 2
> basically finishes the job and makes it work properly. Option 3 is, as you
> say, unappealing. I have n
> On 9 Nov 2016, at 19:48, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
>
> Renato Botelho wrote:
>
>> I decided to give a try to WITH_AUTO_OBJ and noted the first time I ran
>> buildworld it failed with following message:
>>
>> /u/src # ❯❯❯ make WITH_AUTO_OBJ=yes buildworld
>> [Creating objdir obj...]
>> make: "
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1667 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1667/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1667/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1667/c
11 matches
Mail list logo