On 14/10/2016 18:51, Lewis Donzis wrote: > Our opinion doesn’t count for much, but I like 2 or 4. Option 1 would > essentially obviate the entire purpose of changing the structure. Option 2 > basically finishes the job and makes it work properly. Option 3 is, as you > say, unappealing. I have no problem with Option 4, obviously we can change > our code back to the old way, but assuming there was a good reason for this > change in the first place, Option 2 seems more logical. > > But whatever y’all decide is fine with us, we’ll just change code to match at > the appropriate time.
Anyone interested in the issue, could you please take a look at this review? https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8430 Thank you. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
