Hi!
we've got a lot of common code in sys/*/*/vm_machdep.c wrt the
sf_buf allocation. I have gathered it into kern/subr_sfbuf.c.
o No MD code left in sys/*/*/vm_machdep.c.
o The arches that have physical map have their implementation in
machine/sf_buf.h
o The arches that needs sf_bufs use s
On 7/18/2014 4:06 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
K> b) We are a major release away from OpenBSD (5.6 coming soon) - is
K> following OpenBSD's pf the past? - should it be?
Following OpenBSD on features would be cool, but no bulk imports
would be made again. Bulk imports produce bad quality of port,
and
On Jul 17, 2014, at 13:00, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 12:57, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
>>> 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install
On 18 July 2014 14:21, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:10:34PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> On 18 July 2014 07:28, Lars Engels wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar
> I guess that I should do:
> # echo kern.vty=\"vt\" >> /boot/loader.conf
That did the trick. Thanks Ed!
2014-07-19 0:57 GMT+02:00 Daniel Peyrolon :
> Allright, it seems that the kernel switched back to sysconsole. (kern.vty:
> sc)
>
> The wiki says that I should add this to the loader:
>
Allright, it seems that the kernel switched back to sysconsole. (kern.vty:
sc)
The wiki says that I should add this to the loader:
To enable Newcons on i386 or amd64, set the loader tunable kern.vty=vt.
I guess that I should do:
# echo kern.vty=\"vt\" >> /boot/loader.conf
2014-07-18 18
Hi;
Out of curiosity I took a peek at Apple's libc and generated some diffs
against
the libc in FreeBSD's 8. Most of the changes are not relevant to FreeBSD
anymore as we have grown alternative implementations for things like
xlocale.
Nevertheless, there are still some small things to look at
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:10:34PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> On 18 July 2014 07:28, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote
On 7/18/14, 6:28 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-07-17 16:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install a
On 2014-07-18 15:07, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 18 July 2014 07:34, krad wrote:
>> that is true and I have not problem using man pages, however thats not the
>> way most of the world work and search engines arent exactly new either. We
>> should be trying to engage more people not less, and part of
Hi!
On 18 July 2014 07:28, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>>
>> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > > On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
>> > >> On Thu, Jul 17
On 18 July 2014 07:34, krad wrote:
> that is true and I have not problem using man pages, however thats not the
> way most of the world work and search engines arent exactly new either. We
> should be trying to engage more people not less, and part of that is
> reaching out.
Then do the port and
On 18 July 2014 12:36, Daniel Peyrolon wrote:
> I basically installed from a FreeBSD VT enabled ISO.
Ok, it seems those are not available any longer.
To confirm that you're actually using vt, check "sysctl kern.vty". It
will report either sc, vt, or an error. If you get an error the
kernel pre
I basically installed from a FreeBSD VT enabled ISO. You presume correctly.
On Jul 18, 2014 3:42 PM, "Ed Maste" wrote:
> On 18 July 2014 10:32, Daniel Peyrolon wrote:
> > The problems arise when I try to use the console, the screen just shows a
> > static image of the last xorg frame, with some
Back in the day we didn't have Google to ask the oracle for cut and paste
answers. If the man page is accurate that should be good enough.
On Jul 18, 2014 8:26 AM, "krad" wrote:
> this is also another important point. If you go onto google and search on
> how to do this and that under pf, you g
that is true and I have not problem using man pages, however thats not the
way most of the world work and search engines arent exactly new either. We
should be trying to engage more people not less, and part of that is
reaching out.
On 18 July 2014 15:10, Matt Bettinger wrote:
> Back in the day
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Baptiste Daroussin
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > > On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> >
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Craig Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I attend a lot of different Meetup groups in the San Francisco Bay Area /
> Silicon Valley.
>
> What I am seeing is the following usage pattern for new developers,
> especially for web apps and cloud applications.
>
> (1) On thei
this is also another important point. If you go onto google and search on
how to do this and that under pf, you get a mix of freebsd, and openbsd
stuff coming up. I havent analysed it but i think the majority of the stuff
is openbsd related. THerefore I find some nice solution to my problem, only
t
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:07:39PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:57:52PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 17 July 2014 13:54, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, N
On 18 July 2014 10:32, Daniel Peyrolon wrote:
> The problems arise when I try to use the console, the screen just shows a
> static image of the last xorg frame, with some weird colors.
I presume you mean you try to access the console by pressing
Ctrl-Alt-F1 (for example), and then see the static
Hello there, I have both and a end-of-June installed kernels (the second at
/boot/kernel.old), and somehow, the console stops working when it changes
its mode.
I'm using the most recent one, I installed xdm and I'm running xorg over
here, without problems.
The problems arise when I try to use the
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd
> > wrote:
> > >>> Hi!
Hi Kristian,
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:12, Kristian K. Nielsen wrote:
> a) First of all - are any actively developing pf in FreeBSD?
not directly related to FreeBSD, but I was planning to bring
DragonFly's pf to a new feature state. We've had a little bit
of discussion over the recent DF SMP fixes
Gleb Smirnoff writes:
Hi,
> Following OpenBSD on features would be cool, but no bulk imports
> would be made again. Bulk imports produce bad quality of port,
> and also pf in OpenBSD has no multi thread support.
Seems this is the Next Big Thing ™ that will hit OpenBSD/pf according to
last confe
Mark,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 01:31:04PM +, Mark Felder wrote:
M> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:12:09AM +0200, Kristian K. Nielsen wrote:
M> > K> a) First of all - are any actively developing pf in FreeBSD?
M> >
M> > No one right now.
M> >
M>
M> How do we fix this? Can the FreeBSD Foundati
July 18 2014 6:07 AM, "Gleb Smirnoff" wrote:
> Kristian,
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:12:09AM +0200, Kristian K. Nielsen wrote:
> K> a) First of all - are any actively developing pf in FreeBSD?
>
> No one right now.
>
How do we fix this? Can the FreeBSD Foundation step in and provide fundi
On 2014-07-17 16:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
>>> 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
>>> can't just
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:06:45 +0400 Gleb Smirnoff
wrote about Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?:
GS> The pf mailing list is about a dozen of active people. Yes, they are
GS> vocal on the new syntax. But there also exist a large number of common
GS> FreeBSD users who sim
Gleb Smirnoff wrote, On 07/18/2014 13:06:
[...]
The pf mailing list is about a dozen of active people. Yes, they are vocal
on the new syntax. But there also exist a large number of common FreeBSD
users who simply use pf w/o caring about syntax and reading pf mailing
list. If we destroy the synt
I would like to see an updated version of pf. I realize its a big job to
port it though
On 17 July 2014 00:12, Kristian K. Nielsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been encouraged by people on the pf-mailinglist to move this
> discussion to the current mailinglist since this may be an area in the OS
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:10:25PM +0200, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:00:03PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 17 July 2014 12:57, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > >> 3) The binary
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:00:03PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 12:57, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
> >> 4) .. which means, when you do things
Kristian,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:12:09AM +0200, Kristian K. Nielsen wrote:
K> a) First of all - are any actively developing pf in FreeBSD?
No one right now.
K> b) We are a major release away from OpenBSD (5.6 coming soon) - is
K> following OpenBSD's pf the past? - should it be?
Following
34 matches
Mail list logo
