Re: Running out of bits p_flag (sys/sys/proc.h)

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:25:22AM +0100, Davide Italiano wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:58 AM, hiren panchasara > wrote: > > With revision=246484, it seems we have hit the limit. > > At $WORK we have one more flag and to accommodate that we need to bump this > > up. > > > > Can p_flag be bum

Re: Running out of bits p_flag (sys/sys/proc.h)

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:58 AM, hiren panchasara wrote: > With revision=246484, it seems we have hit the limit. > At $WORK we have one more flag and to accommodate that we need to bump this > up. > > Can p_flag be bumped up to u_long? > > Index: proc.h > =

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:56:54PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > [ added Luigi Rizzo to thread ] > > > On 2/11/13 12:26 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > > [trimmed old mails] > > > > Here's a new version of the patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/patches/calloutng-11022012.diff > > > > Si

Re: gpart, slice starts at 0

Hi, On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:44:50 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > I did this to get a disk partitioned: > > > > #!/bin/tcsh > > Gah! > it is a generated script. > > gpart destroy -F da0 > > diskinfo da0 > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=512

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

Doug Rabson wrote: > On 16 February 2013 13:57, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > > > On 16 February 2013 18:58, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > >> This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in > >> the > >> local password database? > >> > >> If you are using heimdal from the base distributio

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2013-02-16 21:37:49 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 21:37:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: > cc -O2 -pipe -I/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns -std=gnu99 > -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -c > /src/lib/

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2013-02-16 20:56:04 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 20:56:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2013-02-16 20:16:52 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 20:16:52 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

TB --- 2013-02-16 19:48:46 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 19:48:46 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2013-02-16 19:20:32 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 19:20:32 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2013-02-16 18:44:24 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 18:44:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2013-02-16 18:10:37 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 18:10:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on armv6/arm

TB --- 2013-02-16 18:10:37 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 18:10:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

On 16 February 2013 16:18, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > On 17 February 2013 00:03, Doug Rabson wrote: > >> I don't think much (if anything) has changed with gssd between 9.1 and >> current. When your gssd hangs, you can try to get a stack trace using gdb's >> attach command. >> >> Fair enough. Howev

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

On 17 February 2013 00:03, Doug Rabson wrote: > I don't think much (if anything) has changed with gssd between 9.1 and > current. When your gssd hangs, you can try to get a stack trace using gdb's > attach command. > > Fair enough. However, when it hangs, I have at least a 50% chance of hitting t

Re: the latest version of Clang/LLVM for the world and kernel

On 2013-02-16 00:04, deeptech71 wrote: ... Another purpose is development. Developers will have to import the next version of Clang/LLVM sooner or later. Let's hedge against the developer-time requirements in case the next version of Clang gets released just before a particular version of Free

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

On 16 February 2013 13:57, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > On 16 February 2013 18:58, Doug Rabson wrote: > >> This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the >> local password database? >> >> If you are using heimdal from the base distribution and you have source, >> you should be

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2013-02-16 15:17:09 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 15:17:09 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: gpart, slice starts at 0

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Erich Dollansky wrote: I did this to get a disk partitioned: #!/bin/tcsh Gah! gpart destroy -F da0 diskinfo da0 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=512 count=34 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=512 count=34 seek=312581774 Someone here on the lists (I unfortunately forget who

Re: llvm-config in base

On 2013-02-16 15:04, paranormal wrote: Is there any plan to include llvm-config in base? No. Please search the list archives for the reasons why; this has been discussed before. If you want to have the full llvm libraries and headers, simply install the port. It is extremely easy to do.

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2013-02-16 14:35:34 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 14:35:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

llvm-config in base

Is there any plan to include llvm-config in base? I'd like to use base version instead of ports version because base has already clang built :). ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To uns

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2013-02-16 13:56:41 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 13:56:41 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

On 16 February 2013 18:58, Doug Rabson wrote: > This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the local > password database? > > If you are using heimdal from the base distribution and you have source, > you should be able to build them with debug information which may help. >

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

TB --- 2013-02-16 13:28:37 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 13:28:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2013-02-16 13:00:16 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 13:00:16 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: gpart, slice starts at 0

Hi, On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:51:22 +0700 Erich Dollansky wrote: > > I did this to get a disk partitioned: > > #!/bin/tcsh > ### > # > # File name: FormatSamsung160GB > # > # Description:This script formats a thu

Re: r24684: /usr/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns/buffer.c:10:10: fatal error: 'ldns/config.h' file not found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/13 07:25, Daniel Nebdal wrote: > That looks like a slightly different issue, though? > r246855 built for me last night, for what it's worth - though I'm not > sure if that was with -Werror. > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael Butler

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2013-02-16 12:24:14 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 12:24:14 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

gpart, slice starts at 0

Hi, I did this to get a disk partitioned: #!/bin/tcsh ### # # File name:FormatSamsung160GB # # Description: This script formats a thumb drive connected as da0 # ###

Re: r24684: /usr/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns/buffer.c:10:10: fatal error: 'ldns/config.h' file not found

That looks like a slightly different issue, though? r246855 built for me last night, for what it's worth - though I'm not sure if that was with -Werror. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael Butler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/15/13 17:49, Daniel Nebdal w

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2013-02-16 11:50:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 11:50:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on armv6/arm

TB --- 2013-02-16 11:50:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 11:50:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the local password database? If you are using heimdal from the base distribution and you have source, you should be able to build them with debug information which may help. When I was writing gssd, I mostly ran it under gdb to debug

Re: HEAD memsticks broken? [USB/CAM Problems?]

On 14-02-2013 20:37, Joel Dahl wrote: > On 12-02-2013 8:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Monday 11 February 2013 23:21:05 Joel Dahl wrote: > > > On 10-02-2013 0:09, Joel Dahl wrote: > > > > On 09-02-2013 20:28, Alexander Motin wrote: > > > > > How long ago that HEAD was built? Could you get

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

OK, here I am replying to my own email. I just want to mention that I removed the ports version of Heimdal, but with no change in behaviour. On 16 February 2013 09:38, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > > On 16 Feb, 2013 1:42 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote: > > > >> And yet one more thing: Heimdal ships wit

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2013-02-16 08:48:58 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 08:48:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2013-02-16 08:06:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 08:06:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Unable to build audio/sox: undefined reference to 'open_memstream'

Hi I get this error building building sox on amd64, but not i386. CC is gcc on both systems. I can't figure out what the configure options difference is between the two hosts that has it fail on the amd64 system. All the dependencies have the same options configured. /bin/sh ../libtool --silen

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2013-02-16 07:26:34 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 07:26:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013