Re: Loading uart module fails

2012-02-22 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:14:19AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 5:08:10 am Bruce Cran wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:25:38 -0500 > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > Oh, the uart[01] devices already exist. I suspect if you removed the > > > hints from /boot/device.

kldstat hangs in 8.3

2012-02-22 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, my sound just stopped working. Dmesg says: pcm0: chn_write(): pcm0:virtual:dsp0.vp0: play interrupt timeout, channel dead I am used to this. I unload the sound module and load it again and the problem is solved. As the unloading did not work, I did this here: AMD620:///home/erich (root) >

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-22 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Feb-21 17:00:53 -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: >Or is this another problem? -rpath is added in /usr/ports/Mk This may help for applications built wihin the ports framework but doesn't help if you want to use gcc46 as a general purpose compiler. On 2012-Feb-21 23:03:27 -0500, Benjamin Kaduk w

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-02-22 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 21. Feb 2012, at 13:35 , Alexander Leidinger wrote: > You can download from > http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/ > The files are > - i386_SMALL > - i386_SMALL_loader.conf > - amd64_SMALL > - amd64_SMALL_loader.conf I only looked at the laoder.conf for amd64 and the only com

Re: AMD K15 sensor support

2012-02-22 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 10:58 am, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > I was wondering if anyone is aware of any ongoing effort to support > the on CPU temp sensors on the AMD K15 CPU's I have a patch to support later chips but not tested on 15h family. > amdtemp only supports up to K11 so far as I can t

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-22 Thread Scott Long
On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Scott Long (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700): > >> On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not >>> be) in GENERIC (at

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-02-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-02-22 08:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-02-22 08:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-02-22 08:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-02-22 08:00:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-02-22 08:00:00 - /usr/bin

Re: Effect of Processor and Memory on KDE4 execution speed

2012-02-22 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer < h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote: > schrieb Mehmet Erol Sanliturk am 14.02.2012 15:39 (localtime): > > Dear All , > > > > Today I have encountered a case which I think informing you about it may > be > > useful . > > > > In my previous messag

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Marius Strobl (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:42:52 +0100): On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:40PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Navdeep Parhar (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:55:40 +): On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:44:01PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there a specific reason that

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Scott Long (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700): On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?