What does dtrace have to do with profiled libs?
On 11/29/2011 17:14, Paul Ambrose wrote:
> I think dtrace for freebsd userland is close to complete( after
> r227290, at least no more kernel panic). but is not suitable for a
> daily use now.
>
> 在 2011年11月30日 上午5:42，Sevan / Venture37 写道：
>> I
I think dtrace for freebsd userland is close to complete( after
r227290, at least no more kernel panic). but is not suitable for a
daily use now.
在 2011年11月30日 上午5:42，Sevan / Venture37 写道：
> I assume every who responded so far doesn't use dtrace?
>
>
> Sevan
> __
kill it.
Warner
On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
> output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
>
> Index: newvers.sh
> ===
Hi Glebius,
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 15:28:42 Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Daan,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:07:13AM +0100, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> D> Thanks for the looking into this and for your quick commit. I like your
> D> twist on the patch with the move from the unit bitmap to allocating un
I assume every who responded so far doesn't use dtrace?
Sevan
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default.
> Opinions?
Agreed. There are better profiling tools available now that do not
require recompiling the program with special options and statically
linking it. Examples are pm
On 11/29/2011 13:07, John Baldwin wrote:
> Any objections to this?
Nope. I wondered why it was there myself, but didn't care enough to ask. :)
> It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
> output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
>
> Index: newvers
Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
Index: newvers.sh
===
--- newvers.sh (revision 228074)
+++ newvers.sh (worki
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated
>> via csup. In both example files there is line specifying what to csup
>>
>> *default release=cvs tag=RE
On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated
>>> via csup. In both example files there is line s
On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated
> via csup. In both example files there is line specifying what to csup
>
> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
>
> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to
After upgrade to r228059 my system panics on each reboot.
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump (textdump=0) at pcpu.h:244
#1 0xc04a5c31 in db_dump (dummy=-1067276850, dummy2=0, dummy3=-1,
dummy4=0xc4a0996c "") at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:537
#2 0xc04a5713 in db_command (last_cmdp=0xc094b2bc, cmd_table=0x
Daan,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:07:13AM +0100, Daan Vreeken wrote:
D> Thanks for the looking into this and for your quick commit. I like your twist
D> on the patch with the move from the unit bitmap to allocating unit numbers
D> with alloc_unr(9).
D>
D> I do have two comments on the new code t
>The only "problem" I see is from the ports lots of them relies on base
>libreadline, so we need to first run an exp-run without libreadline, to
>determine the impact and fix the related ports, before we can fully drop
>libreadline.
One of the first port to consider, i think, is rlwrap. Some ti
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> Baptiste,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> > > after r228114.
> > >
> > > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline
Baptiste,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> > after r228114.
> >
> > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
> >
> > 1) just build & link gdb with libedit
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2) re-i
on 29/11/2011 10:49 Johan Hendriks said the following:
> What you probably did is make delete-old-libs.
> This deletes the old 8.x libs that where used by your ports.
> What you need to do is rebuild all your ports.
In my experience installing misc/compat8x was sufficient.
--
Andriy Gapon
__
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I'd check and make sure the filesystem isn't corrupt for starters.
> Cheers,
well, I did fsck -fy in single user before copy paste
/var/crash/core.txt.5 to this mailing list.
-dikshie-
___
freeb
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:33AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Johan Hendriks
> wrote:
> > al...@stokes.ca schreef:
> >>
> >> However, programs such as startx and portupgrade are failing with the
> >> message "libz.so.5 not found". I know I can fix this with
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> after r228114.
>
> The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
>
> 1) just build & link gdb with libedit
>
> OR
>
> 2) re-import libreadli
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> al...@stokes.ca schreef:
>>
>> However, programs such as startx and portupgrade are failing with the
>> message "libz.so.5 not found". I know I can fix this with an evil
>> symlink, but that doesn't seem right, and what else is broken? Is
al...@stokes.ca schreef:
However, programs such as startx and portupgrade are failing with the
message "libz.so.5 not found". I know I can fix this with an evil
symlink, but that doesn't seem right, and what else is broken? Is there
not a facility in portupgrade to scan my live dependencies and
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:05 AM, dikshie wrote:
> Hi,
> can some enlighten me what's happen in my FreeBSD-9.0 box.
>
> thanks!
I'd check and make sure the filesystem isn't corrupt for starters.
Cheers,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing l
23 matches
Mail list logo
