Am Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:49:50 -0800
schrieb al...@stokes.ca:
> Hello everyone,
Hi,
(I'll shorten this a bit, because I don't have opinions on everything
you wrote)
> I'm either not brave enough or insane enough to put my FreeBSD system
> volume onto the ZFS mirror, as much as that seems kind of
Hello!
It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
after r228114.
The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
1) just build & link gdb with libedit
OR
2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and build INTERNALLIB version of
it that is never installed an
Doug,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
> >>> default?
> >>
> >> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
> >> system for at least a decade.
> >>
> >> Ideally we could do
Hello everyone,
First a quick introduction, then my project, then my problem.
==My FreeBSD involvement==
I've been dabbling with FreeBSD since I set up stokes.ca at pair.com over
a decade ago. I liked the service at Pair, so I installed FreeBSD at home
on a spare box. One of those evil Fujits
On 11/28/2011 16:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <4ed4222e.5010...@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton writes:
>> On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
>
>>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
>>> default?
>>
>> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable
In message <4ed4222e.5010...@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton writes:
>On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
>> default?
>
>Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
>system for at least a decade.
>
>
On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
> default?
Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
system for at least a decade.
Ideally we could do this for 9.0.
Doug
--
"We could
Hi Glebius,
On Friday 25 November 2011 15:32:58 Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:19:35PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> T> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:28:51AM +0100, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> T> D> Recently I've discovered a bug in if_clone.c and if.c where the code
> allows T> D> multi
Am 11/28/11 21:23, schrieb Gábor Kövesdán:
> On 2011.11.27. 12:07, Jan Beich wrote:
>> Oops, here is a diff. Non -l/-L case still seems to be broken.
>>
>>$ echo t>a; echo t>b; echo t>c
>>$ gnugrep --null . ? | vis
>>a\^@t
>>b\^@t
>>c\^@t
>>
>>$ bsdgrep --null . ? | vis
>>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:59 PM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Am 11/28/11 20:10, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>> Am 11/27/11 22:05, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Sources of FreeBSD 10.0-C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/23/11 16:26, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Problem: the iscontrol process starts normally and establishes a
> session and brings up a device, but it cannot be stopped. It does
> not react to a HUP signal, and neither to KILL.
>
> The /dev/da0 device
Am 11/28/11 20:10, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
>> Am 11/27/11 22:05, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, O. Hartmann
>>> wrote:
Sources of FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/amd64 as svn-ed recently:
Path: .
Working C
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:07:52 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:26 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Monday, November 21, 2011 1:45:36 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> >> This weekend I downloaded the Freebsd 9.0 RC2 amd64 ISO image and burned
> >> it
> > to a DVD. I have a comput
On 2011.11.27. 12:07, Jan Beich wrote:
Oops, here is a diff. Non -l/-L case still seems to be broken.
$ echo t>a; echo t>b; echo t>c
$ gnugrep --null . ? | vis
a\^@t
b\^@t
c\^@t
$ bsdgrep --null . ? | vis
a\^@:t
b\^@:t
c\^@:t
Thanks Jan, I've just committed this and y
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Am 11/27/11 22:05, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>> Sources of FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/amd64 as svn-ed recently:
>>>
>>> Path: .
>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org
Dnia poniedziałek, 28 listopada 2011 18:55:04 ZaRiuS KRiNG pisze:
> Ok, the second know how make, but the first no.
>
> How can set new uname -r in the environment? Sorry but in some things need
> a lot of experience, and for that try use current
>
> About what programs got the fail? Chromium and
> Oh, and don't hesitate to try NFSv4. It should do the locking correctly
> without
> needing "nolockd" and the more testing it gets, the better.;-)
>
> rick
>
> > Removing soft,intr had no effect. This, I suspect will be problematic
> > for clusteradm@ if we start updating hosts in the cluster
Am 11/27/11 22:05, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
>> Sources of FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/amd64 as svn-ed recently:
>>
>> Path: .
>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head
>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base
>> Re
Ok, the second know how make, but the first no.
How can set new uname -r in the environment? Sorry but in some things need
a lot of experience, and for that try use current
About what programs got the fail? Chromium and Abiword, with one, 2-3 with
second just one. But make that, pkg_add -r and co
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:34:43 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:34:43 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:34:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:35:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:35:01 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:45 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:45 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:55 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:55 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:55 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:55 - /usr/bin/c
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:20:01PM -0600, Mark Felder wrote:
> > 13:14:32 nas:~ > uname -a
> > FreeBSD nas.feld.me 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #3
> > r227971M:
> > Fri Nov 25 10:07:48 CST 2011
> > r...@nas.feld.me:/usr/obj/tank/svn/sys/GENERIC amd64
> >
> > Th
Hello Jason,
* Jason Edwards , 2027 22:15:
> Thanks for the impressive list of advantages! There's just one
> non-critical issue I'd like to address regarding the use of xterm
> terminal type.
>
> When using cons25 terminal, the dialog menus (drawn using
> devel/cdialog and `make config` in p
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:20:01PM -0600, Mark Felder wrote:
> 13:14:32 nas:~ > uname -a
> FreeBSD nas.feld.me 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #3 r227971M:
> Fri Nov 25 10:07:48 CST 2011
> r...@nas.feld.me:/usr/obj/tank/svn/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> This seemed to start happening sometime
On 24/11/2011 18:06, Mark Martinec wrote:
If you can get it back into this state,
Sure, *every* time.
a procstat -k -k would be very helpful.
(the second -k is not a typo).
# procstat -k -k 5896
PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK
5896 102364 iscontrol-
> Now I think I'll try to rebuild the kernel with "options ATA_CAM" and drop
> "device atapicam".
>
> This question needs to be better resolved in time for FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE.
>
> I cross-post this message to freebsd-current@freebsd.org so the developers
> will see it. FreeBSD users want to be ab
Hello!
Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
default?
They are of no use for 100% users and 99,999% developers and just slow down
world and universe builds.
Here are the results of running buildworld on 1 core on AMD Athlon(tm) 64
X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+:
m
on 28/11/2011 02:59 Ryan Stone said the following:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> Looks like clang has found a real issue here:
>> /usr/src/sys/x86/x86/local_apic.c:311:2: warning: array index of '-16'
>> indexes
>> before the beginning of the array [-Warray-bounds]
> On 11/27/11, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > "b. f." writes:
> >>> > > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel
> >>> > > config file?
> >>> > > Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but
> >>> > > will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprec
Dnia niedziela, 27 listopada 2011 19:59:44 ZaRiuS KRiNG pisze:
> Hi! is my first post here and have a little problem try to google some and
> don't find any of value.
>
> A week ago compile the src of current, and after that in any new port i
> install, if compile before any lib, don't work, i nee
31 matches
Mail list logo
