In message <4ed4222e.5010...@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton writes: >On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by >> default? > >Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new >system for at least a decade. > >Ideally we could do this for 9.0. Can we at least keep one (small) library compiled for profiling, so that compiling for profiling doesn't get broken by accident ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
