On 08/04/2011 22:59, Mattia Rossi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
> and I'm distributing DNS servers that way now. Works fine, my box
> running CURRENT picks up the DNS servers and search domains and writes
> them into /etc/resolv.conf usi
Hi all,
I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
and I'm distributing DNS servers that way now. Works fine, my box
running CURRENT picks up the DNS servers and search domains and writes
them into /etc/resolv.conf using the resolvconf script.
The script anyhow ove
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 3 августа 2011 г., 16:36:32:
> Just in case, signal 4 is SIGILL, an illegal instruction.
> Maybe you are installing world that is built for a higher class CPU.
> Or perhaps a miscompilation by clang.
> Just hypothesizing out loud.
It seems to be miscompilation (as Soekri
Pawel Worach writes:
> On Aug 1, 2011, at 14:24, Test Rat wrote:
>
>> Anyone else? I can still reproduce with trunk r136607.
>> boot and gptboot seem to be unaffected.
>>
>> IIRC, with previous clang import it just stuck during boot
>> without any error messages.
>
> A workaround for the hang on
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:34 PM, kirk russell wrote:
>> I tried out the i386 9 Beta this week. I get a panic when I reboot.
>
>
> This is a well documented WITNESS LOR.
Sorry for the noise. I didn't take the time to review the code first.
hail,
any info on what port multiplier I could buy to make the 4 port Sil3124 at
least make up to 8 ?
will make that much difference if I run stable ? (by what I see 9.0
schedule, that may be the version I'll run)
thanks,
matheus
--
We will call you cygnus,
The God of balance you shall be
A:
On Aug 1, 2011, at 14:24, Test Rat wrote:
> Anyone else? I can still reproduce with trunk r136607.
> boot and gptboot seem to be unaffected.
>
> IIRC, with previous clang import it just stuck during boot
> without any error messages.
A workaround for the hang on boot and "error 1 lba X" failures
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My
> server configuration is:
>
> Dell 1950
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz K8-class
> CPU)
> 4 x CPU
> 2 NIC ( 1
Hi Guys,
I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My
server configuration is:
Dell 1950
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz K8-class
CPU)
4 x CPU
2 NIC ()
I want to reach the high processing of packets per second and use pf as
synproxy an
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:34 PM, kirk russell wrote:
> I tried out the i386 9 Beta this week. I get a panic when I reboot.
...
> You have new mail.
> kleenex# uname -a
> FreeBSD kleenex 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0: Thu Jul 28 16:34:16
> UTC 2011 r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/sr
on 04/08/2011 23:34 kirk russell said the following:
> I tried out the i386 9 Beta this week. I get a panic when I reboot.
Are sure of that?
Searching for word "panic" turns up nothing.
> KDB: debugger backends: ddb
> KDB: current backend: ddb
> Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
> Cop
I tried out the i386 9 Beta this week. I get a panic when I reboot.
KDB: debugger backends: ddb
KDB: current backend: ddb
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All
Hello Everyone,
The system will successfully boot only if the OS installation is laying on
the second drive or higher (0x81 and more).
Attempting Boot From CD-ROM
Attempting Boot From Hard Drive (C:)
* Ed Schouten , 20110804 19:30:
> But on the other hand, nsswitch.conf says it will default to `nis'
> anyway. So I suspect the lines shouldn't be removed, but changed to
> `files', right? Maybe we should consider modifying the configuration
> file accordingly?
After
Hi folks,
I just noticed cron doesn't work nicely when running a system built
without NIS, since it won't allow you to send emails:
| Aug 4 09:45:00 palm postfix/sendmail[12217]: fatal: www(80): No recipient
addresses found in message header
| Aug 4 10:45:00 palm postfix/sendmail[12827]: fatal
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 04:59:32PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> ...
> I am sure that this is caused by r224614.
Well, see: you approached it from knowledge, while I made a
quasi-educated guess. :-}
> I forgot that vn_fullpath cannot operate on the locked vnode.
And I expect you have likely fo
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:54:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I've only seen this on my laptop; my build machine doesn't exhibit the
> panic.
>
> r224602 is the most recent point I've built that does not exhibit the
> panic at all.
>
> The first few lines (hand-transcribed; I have no serial
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:20:47 am Test Rat wrote:
> John Baldwin writes:
>
> > Hmmm, so your BIOS just outright lies then? :(
> >
> > Can you check devinfo -u with 'debug.acpi.disabled=hostres' to see where
> > those memory addresses show up?
Ugh, so ACPI just outright lies it would seem.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:54:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> I will see if I can find a commit that affected at least one of the
> affected files in the above list that I can revert to avoid the panic,
> but I'm a bit slow for a while yet, so I figured I'd finally get around
> to postin
I've only seen this on my laptop; my build machine doesn't exhibit the
panic.
r224602 is the most recent point I've built that does not exhibit the
panic at all.
The first few lines (hand-transcribed; I have no serial console on this
laptop -- the one shortcoming it has):
shared lock of (lockmgr
Hi,
clang gained a new warning for checking the sizeof argument in memset / memcpy
calls, this triggers a couple of times in the FreeBSD tree, here is a brief
summary:
kerberos5/lib/libhx509/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/hx509/cert.c:357:28:
warning: argument to 'sizeof' in 'memset' call is the
Hello Kostik,
>> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> >> But, now I'm using 8.1-RELEASE. May I have advice about 8.X ?
>> > Do you mean a patch for the stable/8 ? I believe it is enough to
>> > apply rev. 211628 to stable/8, then the patch I posted yesterday
>> > shoul
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:56:00PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Hello Kostik,
>
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> >> But, now I'm using 8.1-RELEASE. May I have advice about 8.X ?
> > Do you mean a patch for the stable/8 ? I believe it is enough to
> > apply rev. 211
Hello Kostik,
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> Hello Kostik,
>>
>> From: Kostik Belousov
>> Subject: Re: Bug: devfs is sure to have the bug.
>> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:50:44 +0300
>> > I think the problem you described is real, and suggested change is right.
>>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Hello Kostik,
>
> From: Kostik Belousov
> Subject: Re: Bug: devfs is sure to have the bug.
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:50:44 +0300
> > I think the problem you described is real, and suggested change is right.
> > Initially, I thought t
25 matches
Mail list logo
