Re: xterm -C and TIOCCONS vs. PRIV_TTY_CONSOLE

2011-02-25 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:53:06AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:09:05 -0800 > Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Craig Leres wrote: > > > On 01/06/11 20:05, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > >> Just to make sure we're both on the same page: > > >> > > >>

Re: ieee denormal on ia64?

2011-02-25 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Feb 25, 2011, at 1:33 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Can somebody please confirm that denormal > are not available on ia64, see below. Itanium has denormals. However FP_X_DNML has not been defined, because it's non-standard: ns1% svn log -c121332 lib/libc/ia64/gen/fpsetmask.c -

Re: Cosmetic path to bsdinstall

2011-02-25 Thread Gary Palmer
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:17:46PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Mitya wrote: > > Add usually used RAID controller > > > > --- usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/part_wizard.c.orig ? ?2011-02-19 > > 17:22:06.0 +0200 > > +++ usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/part_wiza

Re: [clang] regression: tmpfs is not mounted from fstab

2011-02-25 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:33:38 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2011-02-25 13:36, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > I can't mount tmpfs from fstab if world/kernel are build by clang, > > however just making world with gcc works fine. > The cause of this issue is a problem with the way clang's integrated >

Re: Cosmetic path to bsdinstall

2011-02-25 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 02/24/11 16:07, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, February 24, 2011 3:35:51 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 02/24/11 14:14, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, February 24, 2011 10:00:44 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: Thanks! I've received basically this patch from a couple people now. I'm going to i

Re: [clang] regression: tmpfs is not mounted from fstab

2011-02-25 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-02-25 13:36, Boris Samorodov wrote: I can't mount tmpfs from fstab if world/kernel are build by clang, however just making world with gcc works fine. The cause of this issue is a problem with the way clang's integrated assembler handles global symbols that are not referenced. This prob

Re: [clang] regression: tmpfs is not mounted from fstab

2011-02-25 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:36:46 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: > I can't mount tmpfs from fstab if world/kernel are build by clang, Sorry, should have mentioned earlier, tmpfs module is loaded. The diagnostic message is: - mount: tmpfs: Operation not supported by device - -- WBR, bsam __

[clang] regression: tmpfs is not mounted from fstab

2011-02-25 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi! I can't mount tmpfs from fstab if world/kernel are build by clang, however just making world with gcc works fine. The last revision I've tested: - % uname -a FreeBSD h30.sp.ipt.ru 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1 r219024: Fri Feb 25 13:17:07 MSK 2011 b...@h30.sp.ipt.ru:/usr/obj/usr/

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2011-02-25 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 13:08 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: > Not the same sysmacros.h, the one patched is > sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys/sysmacros.h, the other one > you referenced (sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h) is > removed by the patch. So it is - apologies for the n

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2011-02-25 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/2/25 Bruce Cran : > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: >> >> Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what >> the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it >> failed. > > It looks like there are two patches to sysmacr

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2011-02-25 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: > > Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what > the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it > failed. It looks like there are two patches to sysmacros.h - the first adds SIGNOF an

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2011-02-25 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/2/25 Bruce Cran : > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:28 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: > >> I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT : >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz > > sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h will fail to patch

ieee denormal on ia64?

2011-02-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
Can somebody please confirm that denormal are not available on ia64, see below. Thanks Anton - Forwarded message from FX - > What about denormal? The FreeBSD manpage for fpsetmask() at http://tinyurl.com/64oo7zh says: > #define FP_X_DNML 0x02/* denormal */ so it

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2011-02-25 Thread Bruce Cran
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:28 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: > I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT : > http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h will fail to patch on the latest -CURRENT but tha