After seeing Kirk's presentation on SUJ at
BSDCan, I decided to give it a try.
Wow.
The reality of being able to pull the plug
(or watch an experimental kernel patch
go down in flames) and simply power back
on and have a running system with a sane
clean filesystem almost immediately is
truly ama
On 5/17/10, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I fixed the sparse inode tunefs bug and changed the tunefs behavior based
> on discussions here on curr...@. Hopefully this works for everyone.
Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my
atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU whe
On 05/26/2010 12:00 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribly
> broken between r206173 and r208486 (my machine consistency livelocks
> at X11 startup); the latest driver is still broken as well with the
> same symptoms. I realize that's a huge rev
Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribly
broken between r206173 and r208486 (my machine consistency livelocks
at X11 startup); the latest driver is still broken as well with the
same symptoms. I realize that's a huge revision difference, and I'll
definitely try and track do
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Gerd Truschinski wrote:
From: Gerd Truschinski
Subject: No internet with snapshots
To: curr...@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 12:18 PM
Hi there,
I tried to install the latest FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201005-amd64-bootonly.iso.
FreeBSD is starting, sysinstall is runn
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Gerd Truschinski wrote:
From: Gerd Truschinski
Subject: No internet with snapshots
To: curr...@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 12:18 PM
Hi there,
I tried to install the latest FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201005-amd64-bootonly.iso.
FreeBSD is starting, sysinstall is runn
On 25 May 2010, at 17:48, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when
>> that comes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what
>> state AppleTalk support is in these days. Is anybody still using
>> it, or would now be the time to make all
On 5/25/10 4:25 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when
that comes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what
state AppleTalk support is in these days. Is anybody still using
it, or would now be the time to make all AppleTalk s
> > On 25/05/2010, at 20:55, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >> I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that
> >> comes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk
> >> support is in these days. Is anybody still using it, or would now be the
> >> time
On 25 May 2010 19:13, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
> TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:24 - cvsupp
TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:24 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-05-25 13:30:24 - /usr/bin/c
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that comes
out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk support is
in these days. Is anybody still using it, or would now be the time to make all
AppleTalk support in that port
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:18:47 +0200
Gerd Truschinski wrote:
I tried to install the latest
FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201005-amd64-bootonly.iso.
FreeBSD is starting, sysinstall is running.
I want to install from ftp.freebsd.org. Therefor I try to set the _Media
Typ_ in the _O
On 25 May 2010, at 14:13, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>> I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that
>> comes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk
>> support is in these days. Is anybody still using it, or would now be the
>> time to mak
On 25/05/2010, at 22:05, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> You're using the sys/netatalk AppleTalk protocol for that, or TCP? The
> netatalk port's afpd (Apple File Protocol daemon) can speak AFP over both
> DDP/ASP and TCP, and I'll keep afpd working over TCP of course. I'm talking
> about disabling Ap
On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:18:47 +0200
Gerd Truschinski wrote:
> I tried to install the latest
> FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201005-amd64-bootonly.iso.
> FreeBSD is starting, sysinstall is running.
> I want to install from ftp.freebsd.org. Therefor I try to set the _Media
> Typ_ in the _Options Editor_.
>
Am 25.05.2010 um 13:41 schrieb Daniel O'Connor:
> On 25/05/2010, at 20:55, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that
>> comes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk
>> support is in these days. Is anybody still
Hi there,
I tried to install the latest
FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201005-amd64-bootonly.iso.
FreeBSD is starting, sysinstall is running.
I want to install from ftp.freebsd.org. Therefor I try to set the _Media
Typ_ in the _Options Editor_.
I select the only Network Interface, a nfe, no IP6 but DHCP.
On 25/05/2010, at 20:55, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that comes
> out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk support
> is in these days. Is anybody still using it, or would now be the time to
> make all App
Hi,
I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that comes
out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk support is
in these days. Is anybody still using it, or would now be the time to make all
AppleTalk support in that port optional, and just foc
I am trying to move to current from 8.1-PRERELEASE. After
buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel and rebooting I get:
panic: lapic_enable_cmc: missing APIC 0
cpuid = 0
KDB: enter : panic
while the kernel is booting. This is some boot info from 8.1-PRERELEASE:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
Hello, hope you're having a nice day,
I have a problem with my single-core amd64 system running FreeBSD
8.0-STABLE #1 r200287; if I try running XORP (or igmpproxy) to route
multicast packets, the system traps after a while - usually less than a
hour since the start of xorp process. This is, basica
On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:05:53 -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently reinstalled my FreeBSD 8-STABLE box to move from
> i386 to amd64. The hardware hasn't changed (except for an increase
> from 4GB to 8GB ram).
>
> There have been some hiccups and I am still
23 matches
Mail list logo
