I am successfully using a Mylex DAC1164PVX RAID controller on 5-CURRENT:
mlx0: port 0x2000-0x207f mem
0xf800-0xfbff,0xec91-0xec91007f irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci2
mlx0: controller initialisation in progress...
mlx0: initialisation complete.
mlx0: DAC1164PVX, 3 channels, firmware 5.08-
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:51:07PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
> of hardware?
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation
This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of
FreeBSD 5.1.
FreeBSD 5.1 O
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:26:34AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 03:32:56AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> ...
> > :)
> > And I hoped a programmer who knows the source could find out and fix
> > very quickly.
>
> sorry, i missed the offending line number in your previous email.
I'm using a Ami MegaRaid 1500 in 5.x without any issues.
-m
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
> of hardware?
>
> Same question goes for any recent SCSI RAID controllers supported
> by FreeBSD.
>
> I admit no
Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
of hardware?
Same question goes for any recent SCSI RAID controllers supported
by FreeBSD.
I admit not having tried all combinations but it seems that using anything
else than simple ahc scsi stuff results in kernel panic w
Got the chatter below on a box which had some libkse and some mmap activity
when it got shutdown. Built from morning of 30th May sources.
Pete
May 30 08:56:08 kompak halt: hallted by root
ock order reversal
1st 0xc3335aa8 sigacts (sigacts) @ kern/subr_trap.c:248
2nd 0xc3347d88 process lock (proces
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > I just built jdk13 a couple of days ago. No problem whatsoever. You
> > guys must have rotten karma or something.
> Did you already have a native JDK installed?
No. I used linux-sun-jdk13 to bootstra
I just stumbled across this vnode locking problem in procfs()
db> tr
Debugger(c05215d4,c0520b94,c669b000,c0521615,e6d77764) at Debugger+0x54
vfs_badlock(c0521615,c0520b94,c669b000,c05b4340,c669b000) at vfs_badlock+0x45
assert_vop_locked(c669b000,c0520b94,c0520adf,358,c6a35400) at assert_vop_locked
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
>|---++---+---|
>| || | The recently upgraded |
>| || | if_wi driver is more |
>|
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 03:32:56AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
...
> :)
> And I hoped a programmer who knows the source could find out and fix
> very quickly.
sorry, i missed the offending line number in your previous email.
I think i missed a & in all the first arguments to bcopy in
the src/sbin/
Hi all,
I just got this panic during compile of openoffice
Fatal trap 12 while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x68
fault code= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0271f4d
stack pointer = 0x10:0xe6e51ab0
frame pointer = 0x10:0xe6e51
On (2003/06/01 00:50), Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > I just built jdk13 a couple of days ago. No problem whatsoever. You
> > guys must have rotten karma or something.
>
> Did you already have a native JDK installed?
I built the native 1.4.1 JDK two weeks ago, first without the native JDK
for boots
Hi all,
I just got this panic during compile of openoffice
Fatal trap 12 while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x68
fault code= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0271f4d
stack pointer = 0x10:0xe6e51ab0
frame pointer = 0x10:0xe6e51
Hello everyone
I'm getting a fatal trap when I do 'shutdown' on an SMP-box that
I did cvsup on RELENG_5_1 yesterday.
'reboot' works without any problems.
This is the message:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid=1; lapic.id = 0100
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code
I have a suggestion to deprecate the BOOTP_NFSV3 option, and I wanted to get some
feedback.
If NFS_ROOT and BOOTP_NFSV3 are defined, then it is a noop in sys/i386/i386/locore.s?
If NFS_ROOT is defined and BOOTP_NFSV3 is undefined then it copies in a nfs_diskless
structure in
sys/i386/i386/locor
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Christopher Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to
> > > > build native jav
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:52:57AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "David P. Reese Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In rev 1.214 of sys/dev/pci/pci.c, we have started checking if a
> > pci_set_command_bit() was successful with a subsequent PCI_READ_CONFIG
> > and comparing the results. For
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 05:39:58PM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:18:10PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 May 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> > > It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will*
> > > address this one way or another before the
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:18:10PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2003, Scott Long wrote:
>
> > It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will*
> > address this one way or another before the release. I apologize for
> > taking so long.
>
> Ditto, here, unfort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-May-2003 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Is there any capability in the loader to do such things as get/set a PCI
> config space register?
>
> Looking at the man page I'd say not, but there is mention of
> some PNP capacity (though not currently w
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:24:59PM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:00:16AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> >++
> >| Issue | Status| Responsible | Description |
> >|-
If memory serves me right, Scott Long wrote:
> It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will*
> address this one way or another before the release. I apologize for
> taking so long.
Scott, you're hardly the only person with the ability to test this
problem. In fact, you'r
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will*
> address this one way or another before the release. I apologize for
> taking so long.
Ditto, here, unfortunately. I managed to hose my sparc64 box a couple of
weeks ago trying to up
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:00:16AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will continu
"David P. Reese Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In rev 1.214 of sys/dev/pci/pci.c, we have started checking if a
> pci_set_command_bit() was successful with a subsequent PCI_READ_CONFIG
> and comparing the results. For some odd reason, this doesnt work when
> my viapropm tries to attach.
viapr
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"David P. Reese Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Is it my chipset's fault for not reading back the correct register value?
: The board is a SOYO K7VTAPRO-2AA6. What other info would be helpful in
: this situation?
It appears that there's some non-zero
FreeBSD 5.1 Release Enlightenment BUS ERROR
all actions performed as root
installed 5.1 beta 2
installed bash from ports
then cvsuped to 5.1 release
then from ports installed xfree86, enlightenment, eterm, all with out problems. While
compiling mozilla from one login, i logged in again on anot
Christopher Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to
> > > build native java for FreeBSD.
> > # cd /usr/ports/java/jdk13
> > # make in
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to
> > build native java for FreeBSD.
>
> # cd /usr/ports/java/jdk13
> # make install clean
>
> DES
>
I disagree. I recently built j
in a prior post, I reported "after a fresh "kernel developer" install from the x86 5.1
beta 2 ISO, i successfully configured the network and ping a domain name. Then I
attempted to install /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui. This fails and repeated
attempts provide differing failures. output foll
--On 31. mai 2003 11:22 -0400 Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's what I meant; it didn't work for me. It got pretty far
through the build but seemed to run out of some sort of resource.
I couldn't tell by the error message what it was, and I don't
have the log anymore.
The last time
Whenever I plug my SanDisk SDDR31 CF reader into my 5.1-BETA system,
I am told that the device doesn't support "Get Max Lun". I have added a USB
quirk to my kernel to fix this, and it seems to work perfectly. I would
appreciate if somebody would consider adding this before 5.2-RELEASE.
umass0: San
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:00:16AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list.
> The live version of this list is available at:
>
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html
>
> Automated mailing of this list will continue thro
In rev 1.214 of sys/dev/pci/pci.c, we have started checking if a
pci_set_command_bit() was successful with a subsequent PCI_READ_CONFIG
and comparing the results. For some odd reason, this doesnt work when
my viapropm tries to attach. Allocating its port resources fails in
pci_enable_io_method().
I have flushed my integration tree now for all but three patches
which are subject to various special handlings.
Sorry about the commit-storm, but I didn't feel like dumping it all
into one commit ("What I did during code freeze").
And now, back to the real substantial stuff in the other trees :
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:21:20 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:21:20 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:23:04 - building world
TB
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:06:48 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:06:48 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:08:27 - building world
TB --- cd /home
TB --- 2003-05-31 18:52:11 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2003-05-31 18:52:11 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-05-31 18:54:44 - building world
TB --- cd /home
Hei!
On Thursday May 29th I installed FreeBSD 5.1 Beta2. The next day I've
update to CURRENT from May 30th. I have a 60 GB ATA harddisk and during
installation I created only 1 20 GB slice for FreeBSD. Today I wanted
to use the other 40 GB of my hard disk and create two more slices each
20 GB. Wel
Valentin Nechayev wrote:
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 17:38:04, larse (Lars Eggert) wrote about "Re: Libthr stable enough for testing":
LE> I tried, but the following is a surefire way to freeze my SMP box solid
LE> at the moment (with today's libthr):
SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD?
SCHED_4BSD
--
Lars Egge
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 17:38:04, larse (Lars Eggert) wrote about "Re: Libthr stable
enough for testing":
LE> I tried, but the following is a surefire way to freeze my SMP box solid
LE> at the moment (with today's libthr):
SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD?
-netch-
__
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 18:53:16, segr (Stephane Raimbault) wrote about "FreeBSD
5.1-BETA2 boot up messages":
SR> I just noticed that when I boot up in FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 I get a whole bunch of
SR> messages fly by the screen (see below for errors from /var/log/messages).
SR> Does anyone know what
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to
> > build native java for FreeBSD.
>
> # cd /usr/ports/java/jdk13
> # make install clean
That's what I meant; it didn't work for me.
45 matches
Mail list logo
