Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-04-05 Thread Mike Barcroft
Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html > > Sat Apr 5 03:38:00 EST 2003 > U Makefile.inc1 > cvs update: ignoring bin/dumplfs (CVS/Repository missing) > cvs update: ignoring contrib/amd/conf/mount (CVS/Repository missing) > cvs [upd

Re: device puc on non-i386 or with parallel devices

2003-04-05 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm currently working on updating the hardware release notes to reflect : reality. the puc device is currently only in the i386 section of the : release notes, however I am under the impression people are succe

Re: Integer Exception/5-CURRENT/cbb related

2003-04-05 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:536 536 if ((ih->ih_flags & IH_MPSAFE) == 0) This is very odd. It doesn't make any sense. Warner

Okay. who broke ata.

2003-04-05 Thread Kevin S. Brackett
make world from yesterday broke support for my promise udma66 controller, getting READ/WRITE errors on the drive attached to, reverting to previous kernel fixes problem. Apr 4 15:38:40 hades kernel: atapci0: port 0xd400-0xd43f,0xd000-0xd003,0xcc00-0xcc07,0xc800-0xc803,0xc400-0xc407 mem 0xef0 00

strange SCSI problem

2003-04-05 Thread RMH
Hello gentlemen, I've observed a very strange SCSI trouble never seen before. It happened suddenly, under very low system load and disk activity; though it didn't lead to any damage or data loss, but I'm curious what could be a cause. Visually, it appeared like a delay in disk access but at the sa

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-04-05 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html -- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -

Re: HEADS UP: fxp breakage

2003-04-05 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Maxime Henrion wrote: Hi all, I was finally able to reproduce the problems people have been reporting. That is, the fxp(4) card works but there are many odd "unknown: DMA timeout" and "unknown: device timeout" messages. This was due to a bug in fxp(4) which was harmle

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-04-05 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html Fri Apr 4 11:38:00 EST 2003 cvs [update aborted]: /work/repo/CVSROOT: Interrupted system call ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To u

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-04-05 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html Fri Apr 4 19:38:00 EST 2003 U Makefile.inc1 cvs update: cannot remove procctl directory: Directory not empty cvs [update aborted]: cannot make directory conf: File exists ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-04-05 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html Sat Apr 5 03:38:00 EST 2003 U Makefile.inc1 cvs update: ignoring bin/dumplfs (CVS/Repository missing) cvs update: ignoring contrib/amd/conf/mount (CVS/Repository missing) cvs [update aborted]: cannot open CVS/Root: No such file or dire

Re: systat -v on -CURRENT

2003-04-05 Thread Craig Reyenga
Now that you mention it, Yes: ad2 is -0% busy. Disks ad0 ad2 cd0 pass0 ofodintrn KB/t 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %slo-z30576 buf tps 0 0 0 0 tfree23 dirtybuf MB/s 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17867

systat -v on -CURRENT

2003-04-05 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
Hi, I've noticed that 'systat -v' sometimes reports a negative disk activity percentile. Has anyone else noticed this behavior? Before I look into the problem, is someone already working on a fix? Regards, > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | ht

Re: kp_proc and kp_eproc

2003-04-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:26:14PM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote: > Thanks, I will give it a try, but probably not until Monday when I > get back to work. Since you said you made this a while ago and it is > untested, does that mean that you once used PBS and are using something > else in its stead.

Re: Anyone had hangs with Radeon, XF86 4.3.0, and DRI on logout?

2003-04-05 Thread Matthias Buelow
Julian St. wrote: It seems not to be related, but when I try to kill my X Server using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace, my box powers down (jsut like an APM power-down). I started noticing it using 4-STABLE+ NVidia driver, but it continued to be the case on -CURRENT with Xfree86's nv driver. I always see this

Re: ATA problems on Promise controller

2003-04-05 Thread Friedemann Becker
try hw.ata.ata_dma="0" in /boot/loader.conf to disable DMA, it is currently broken but worked on On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Paul van der Zwan wrote: > With a -current kernel ( cvsupped today ) I can no longer boot. > It hangs on the drives connected to the promis controller built into my > MSI KT266 mob

ATA problems on Promise controller

2003-04-05 Thread Paul van der Zwan
With a -current kernel ( cvsupped today ) I can no longer boot. It hangs on the drives connected to the promis controller built into my MSI KT266 mobo. The messages are like ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Same for ad3. It tries falling back to pio mode but after that it hangs

Re: IBM T30 USB issue: kernel: uhub2: device problem, disabling port 1

2003-04-05 Thread Lee Damon
I just doubled USB_PORT_POWERUP_DELAY from 300 to 600. Same problem when I hit the bluetooth button. All tests have been done with the laptop running on AC line feed. I doubt it's related, but this system is using APM because ACPI doesn't work right yet. Apr 5 11:32:17 tylendel kernel: uhub2

sound driver

2003-04-05 Thread Daniel Kanafa
Hello, I have a little problem with my soundcard :> [ttyp4] [20:57] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dmesg | grep pcm pcm0: at port 0x370-0x371,0x330-0x331,0x388-0x38b,0x530-0x537,0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1,0 on isa0 1st 0xc17121c0 pcm0 (sound softc) @ dev/sound/isa/mss.c:179 2nd 0xc174f340 pcm0:play:0 (pcm ch

USB Ohci Suspend/Resume

2003-04-05 Thread Anish Mistry
Hi, I've been working on some usb suspend/resume code for my laptop since the USB ports stop working after a resume. After a lot of trial and error I finally got it to "work" sorta. Behavior with my code: 1) If I remove any type of device, suspend the laptop and then resume any usb dev

Re: So then, is fxp working OK again?

2003-04-05 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 05-Apr-2003 Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > On 05-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote: >> >> Could you post a complete stack trace? There's no fxp functions in this >> (incomplete) trace. Are you sure the problem you're having now is fxp >> related ? > > I think you're right. I built a GENERIC kerne

Re: Anyone had hangs with Radeon, XF86 4.3.0, and DRI on logout?

2003-04-05 Thread Julian St.
Am Sa, 2003-04-05 um 16.52 schrieb Julian St.: > Am Fr, 2003-04-04 um 23.30 schrieb Eric Anholt: > > As the subject says, I'm wondering if anyone out there has experienced > > hangs on logging out from xdm (or perhaps switching VTs) with Radeon or > > matrox (perhaps r128, too) cards using the upda

Re: Anyone had hangs with Radeon, XF86 4.3.0, and DRI on logout?

2003-04-05 Thread Sean Welch
Eric, this isn't precisely the situation you asked about, but it may be related. I've had similar problems to what was noted by MKB but an older setup. I'm running 5.0-RELEASE on my I8K with the Mobility Radeon 7500 (M7 chip with 64MB) configured with XFree86-4.2.0_1,1 and DRI compiled from CVS

Re: So then, is fxp working OK again?

2003-04-05 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 05-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote: > Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> >> Still no go. I'm still getting a panic in bus_dmamem_alloc(). >> Here's the info I copied down by hand: >> >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >> fault virtual address = 0x24 >> fault code = supervisor read, pag

no buffer space available

2003-04-05 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I'm using FreeBSD 5.0 as a gateway machine in my home network. I'm running a DSL (pppoe) and over that also a vpn tunnel (mpd) to the campus. >From time to time, when my provider has problems with his router or whatever he is doing (resetting the link or something) - I have a fixed IP btw -, ppp

Re: HEADS UP: fxp breakage

2003-04-05 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Maxime Henrion wrote: Hi all, I was finally able to reproduce the problems people have been reporting. That is, the fxp(4) card works but there are many odd "unknown: DMA timeout" and "unknown: device timeout" messages. This was due to a bug in fxp(4) which was harmless unless you used DEVICE_PO

Re: HEADS UP: fxp breakage

2003-04-05 Thread Maxime Henrion
Hi all, I was finally able to reproduce the problems people have been reporting. That is, the fxp(4) card works but there are many odd "unknown: DMA timeout" and "unknown: device timeout" messages. This was due to a bug in fxp(4) which was harmless unless you used DEVICE_POLLING. These

RE: HEADS UP: fxp breakage

2003-04-05 Thread Robin P. Blanchard
Ok. Here's the information requested. This is taken from the boxes running a working, older kernel (otherwise wouldn't be able to get to them remotely). I can get the same info with the broken kernel come Monday should that be necessary. Hope this helps! 1) dell poweredge 4350 fxp0: flags=18843 m

SV: Anyone had hangs with Radeon, XF86 4.3.0, and DRI on logout?

2003-04-05 Thread Matt Douhan
Hi I am using a Radeon 7500 mobility and as of 4th of april I cannot get X going at all on current, it totally crashes X My X log can be found in pr i386/50606 rgds Matt -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Eric Anholt Skickat: den 4 april 2003 2

Re: Anyone had hangs with Radeon, XF86 4.3.0, and DRI on logout?

2003-04-05 Thread Julian St.
Am Fr, 2003-04-04 um 23.30 schrieb Eric Anholt: > As the subject says, I'm wondering if anyone out there has experienced > hangs on logging out from xdm (or perhaps switching VTs) with Radeon or > matrox (perhaps r128, too) cards using the updated DRM in -current and > XFree86 4.3.0. If so, I may

Re: context switching pessimizations

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: > Recent optimizations of context switching are large pessimizations > according to lmbench2, at least in the default case (no LAZY_SWITCH). The ifdefs are just so convoluted that they are broken in the !LAZY_SWITCH case. %%% Index: swtch.s

Re: device puc on non-i386 or with parallel devices

2003-04-05 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > Also, is anyone successfully using it to provide parallel port access? As > far as I can tell, the device supports parallel ports, all the comments in > the code suggests it does, however I can't find any mention of people > using it for parallel ports an

context switching pessimizations

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Evans
Recent optimizations of context switching are large pessimizations according to lmbench2, at least in the default case (no LAZY_SWITCH). >From lmbench2 output on an AthlonXP-1600 overclocked with no acpi (so the timecounter is the TSC and doesn't pessimize context switching all by itself), and no

device puc on non-i386 or with parallel devices

2003-04-05 Thread Gavin Atkinson
Hi all, I'm currently working on updating the hardware release notes to reflect reality. the puc device is currently only in the i386 section of the release notes, however I am under the impression people are successfully using it with other platforms. Can anyone confirm this? Also, is anyone suc

Re: IBM T30 USB issue: kernel: uhub2: device problem, disablingport 1

2003-04-05 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 10:02:47AM -0800, Lee Damon wrote: > I've just sup'd a completely clean source tree and compiled a new > kernel and world. My kernconf is the generic one with pcm and apm > turned on. apci is turned off in the hints file (because it breaks > the mouse). I have INVARIANTS,

Re: Building 5-CURRENT world under 4-STABLE?

2003-04-05 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:32:20 +0300 Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RE> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: RE> > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:41:14 +0300 RE> > I've a feeling that there are a fair number of folks planning RE> > on going 4-STABLE to 5-STABLE whe

Re: Anyone had hangs with Radeon, XF86 4.3.0, and DRI on logout?

2003-04-05 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: > Date: 04 Apr 2003 13:30:39 -0800 > From: Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Anyone had hangs with Radeon, XF86 4.3.0, and DRI on logout? > > As the subject says, I'm wondering if anyone out there has experienced > hangs o