On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:32:20 +0300
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RE> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
RE> > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:41:14 +0300
RE> > I've a feeling that there are a fair number of folks planning
RE> > on going 4-STABLE to 5-STABLE when it happens. It would be nice if
RE> > that path were smooth.
RE> >
RE> The jump from 4.LATEST-RELEASE -> 5.FIRST-STABLE-RELEASE release
RE> will be of course supported. The question here is should we
That "of course" in this kind of context is one of the best
things about FreeBSD. Thank you.
RE> support say 4.8-STABLE -> 5.8-STABLE, that far?
Oh well that's another matter, it's well known that upgrades
over too wide a jump are sticky and may require staging (at which point
sanity usually intervenes with migration instead).
--
C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors
The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see:
| http://www.sohara.org/
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
