ffs changes 4.8-PR2 -> 5.0?

2003-03-08 Thread Thomas Stratmann
Hi all, I have a box with a stable 4.8-PRERELEASE and a -current from a few weeks ago. The root fs on -current is a UFS1. When I do fsck inside the stable system for the -current root, everything is fine except "summary information bad". (The same happens when I mount the -stable root from the -cu

how to burn R/cdrom/disc1

2003-03-08 Thread $BGHMhC+!!
Hello (BI run make release on -current (BI got /junk/release/R/cdrom/disc1 and disc2 (BSo I run "mkisofs -U -R -b floppies/boot.flp -o cd.iso disc1" (BAnd make cd-rom (BBut can't install from cdrom (BPlease help me how to make hard-disk-boot CD image with mkisofs (B (BThank you (B (B (BT

Re: Gnome2 terminal will not work right -- SOLVED

2003-03-08 Thread Tom Parquette
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:39, Tom Parquette wrote: What changed between the last known working date and tonight? Joe, Nothing that I know of. I did a make buildworld/buildkernel on this machine that was NFS mounted on another but I have not installed it on t

Re: Gnome2 terminal will not work right

2003-03-08 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:39, Tom Parquette wrote: > >What changed between the last known working date and tonight? > > > > > Joe, Nothing that I know of. I did a make buildworld/buildkernel on > this machine that was NFS mounted on another but I have not installed it > on this machine yet.

Re: Gnome2 terminal will not work right

2003-03-08 Thread Tom Parquette
What do you have in your ~/.xinitrc? Can you also send the output of pkg_info? Also, have you tried removing ~/.gnome2/session, and see if that helps? Joe Joe, I just tried removing the session file. Nothing changed. Someone suggested rebuilding gnometerminal. I may try that since it seems

Re: Gnome2 terminal will not work right

2003-03-08 Thread Tom Parquette
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 00:15, Tom Parquette wrote: People have been saying that 5.0-CURRENT problems belong here. I don't know if this is Gnome2 or Xfree86... Both work fine for me in -CURRENT. I noticed tonight that the Gnome2 desktop terminal stopped working.

Re: Gnome2 terminal will not work right

2003-03-08 Thread Stephen Hilton
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 09:00:36 -0800 Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/7/2003 11:50 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:30:34PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote: > >> > >>this may be unrelated, but for about ten days or so, I have problems > >>where gnometerminal will sto

Re: NULL pointer problem in pid selection ?

2003-03-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen similar > before. addr2line(1) reports the faulting address to be > ../../../kern/kern_fork.c:395 > which is in the inner loop of pid collision avoidance. I've b

ddb & kernel panic's

2003-03-08 Thread Matt
Hi, I run -CURRENT and have experienced a total lockup of the machine every couple of weeks where it would just freeze with nothing on the console and I would have to power cycle it to get it back. Previously I had all the debug options turned off such as ddb, witness, invarients etc but I thou

XFree86 4.3 and Cyrillic Xkb layouts

2003-03-08 Thread Andrei Popov
There's something fishy with Xkb in 4.3: whenever I try cyrillic layouts (e.g. ru, bg, ua, etc.), I cannot type a thing (and yes, cyrillic fonts are listed in font path). Once I change it to any latin-based (us, pl, sk, cz, fr, etc.) -- all is ok. Running xev shows that event is there. Anyone see

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Maxime Henrion
Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 2:33 PM -0500 3/8/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > >By adding that #warning, you are going to have a compile-time error > >on some compilers, whether or not you want it. Hiding it inside of > >an #if/#endif will help for some compilers, but not on all of them. > >

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 2:33 PM -0500 3/8/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote: By adding that #warning, you are going to have a compile-time error on some compilers, whether or not you want it. Hiding it inside of an #if/#endif will help for some compilers, but not on all of them. Er, I should note that I do like the idea of

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 10:48 AM -0800 3/8/03, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:28:13PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > `#if __GNUC__' wouldn't help matters; every preprocessor has to > read and interpret every preprocessor directive (so that `#else' > and `#endif' can be recognized). I don't thin

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:28:13PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > `#if __GNUC__' wouldn't help matters; every preprocessor has to read > and interpret every preprocessor directive (so that `#else' and > `#endif' can be recognized). I don't think preprocessors should interpret directives when t

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:19:43AM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > In , I see: > > #if __GNUC__ > #warning "No user-serviceable parts inside." > #endif > > > Does the use of #warning need to be protected by > #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? I am working > on something similar for

Re: sendmail_enable="NONE" doesn't appear in rc.conf

2003-03-08 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
nunotex> sendmail_enable="NONE" doesn't appear in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Can nunotex> anyone update this file to include "NONE" option? This was done on purpose: Revision 1.158, Tue Sep 3 22:15:54 2002 UTC (6 months ago) by gshapiro Branch: MAIN Deprecate the use of sendmail_enable="NONE" as it

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 08), Garrett Wollman said: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:19:43 -0500, Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Does the use of #warning need to be protected by > > #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? > > No, it needs to be replaced by the standard `#error' directive > ins

#warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Does the use of #warning need to be protected by > #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? No, it needs to be replaced by the standard `#error' directive instead. I asked portmgr to do a run on the portsd cluster with this change to look for ports that mistakenly include this file, but I

Re: Gnome2 terminal will not work right

2003-03-08 Thread Lars Eggert
On 3/7/2003 11:50 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:30:34PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote: this may be unrelated, but for about ten days or so, I have problems where gnometerminal will stop updating after a while. I can still use the menus, close it, etc. - but all output is suspe

Re: sendmail_enable="NONE" doesn't appear in rc.conf

2003-03-08 Thread Michael Edenfield
From: "Daniel Flickinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 11:48 AM > I have not checked recently, but 'make installworld' has > always trashed files: > > /usr/sbin/sendmail > /usr/bin/mailq > /usr/bin/newaliases > > which, in the default, are symbolic lin

ng_iface commit broken

2003-03-08 Thread leafy
mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/dev -I@/. ./include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include /usr/src/sys/modules/netgraph/ifa ce/../../../netgraph/ng_iface.c /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_iface.c:53:23: opt_atalk.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_arcsubr.c if_atmsubr.c if_ef.c if_ethersubr.c if_faith.c if_fddisubr.c if_gif.c if_iso88025subr.c if_loop.c if_ppp.c if_sl.c if_spppsubr.c if_stf.c if_tun.c netisr.c netisr.h src/sys/netatalk aarp.c at_extern.h at_var.h ...

2003-03-08 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:11:35PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello. > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:19:55PM -0800, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > jlemon 2003/03/04 15:19:55 PST > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/net if_arcsubr.c if_atmsubr.

#warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

2003-03-08 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, In , I see: #if __GNUC__ #warning "No user-serviceable parts inside." #endif Does the use of #warning need to be protected by #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? I am working on something similar for . Some other header files check for __GNUC__ before using #warning, such as , but does

Re: softupdates && write cache && ata tags topic

2003-03-08 Thread Matthias Schuendehuette
Hi, > Is it safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)? The summary of *my* experience and knowledge is: It is considered *unsave* to use Soft Updates with WriteCache enabled. I consider it unnecessary to use WriteCache if TaggedQueuing is enabled and working. (The performace

kermit hoses my system, too

2003-03-08 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I posted a note that mgetty was hosing my system because it clobbered /etc/ttys with data froim /etc/passwd and Terry meant it could have to do with some old FreeBSD VM bug. Today I tried to connect to the modem via kermit and the system got frozen bad. dmesg: w.bus.devctl_disable: WARNING: /

sendmail_enable="NONE" doesn't appear in rc.conf

2003-03-08 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello to all, sendmail_enable="NONE" doesn't appear in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Can anyone update this file to include "NONE" option? Thanke very much, Nuno Teixeira -- /* PGP fingerprint: C6D1 06ED EB54 A99C 6B14 6732 0A5D 810D 727D F6C6 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI

softupdates && write cache && ata tags topic

2003-03-08 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello to all, I understand the basic concept of the folowing techs: softupdates, disk write cache and ata tags. My question is: It is safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)? I read someware that it not safe to use softupdate + write cache (without ata tags) and if

Re: Big IDE drive + little IDE controller + freebsd

2003-03-08 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems James Satterfield wrote: Hmm there is a workaround in -current for using 48bit access to the old promises, however it should only engage when you access areas beyond 137G on the drives. However using 48bit modes on older controllers are not really a good idea as they tend to do wierd thin

FreeBSD 5.0R panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy???

2003-03-08 Thread Mica Telodico
Hi, I get this error afrer few time of working always during this the listening of the music contained in my EXT3 partition here the operation that I do: >> Starting Xserver >> Kldloading snd_cmi >> mounting my EXT3 partition in read-only mode >> starting listening music with XMMS I don't have th

Re: failed to set signal flags properly for ast()

2003-03-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I've been getting a few of these on 5.0 lately: > > Mar 7 21:31:07 bento kernel: failed to set signal flags properly for > ast() > > Is there any additional debugging information I can provide to help > track this down? It wouldn't hurt to know the si

NULL pointer problem in pid selection ?

2003-03-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen similar before. addr2line(1) reports the faulting address to be ../../../kern/kern_fork.c:395 which is in the inner loop of pid collision avoidance. Poul-Henning Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id

witness needs DDB

2003-03-08 Thread David Xu
subr_witness.c now needs DDB option enabled, otherwise can not be compiled. please fix it. David Xu To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_arcsubr.c if_atmsubr.c if_ef.c if_ethersubr.c if_faith.c if_fddisubr.c if_gif.c if_iso88025subr.c if_loop.c if_ppp.c if_sl.c if_spppsubr.c if_stf.c if_tun.c netisr.c netisr.h src/sys/netatalk aarp.c at_extern.h at_var.h ...

2003-03-08 Thread qhwt
Hello. On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:19:55PM -0800, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > jlemon 2003/03/04 15:19:55 PST > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/net if_arcsubr.c if_atmsubr.c if_ef.c > if_ethersubr.c if_faith.c if_fddisubr.c >

Re: "blockable sleep lock" panic in latest -current.

2003-03-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On 6 Mar 2003, Thomas Seck wrote: > * Bruce Evans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > This is the usual panic from sync() in panic() tripping over a lock. > > Calling sync() in panic was never safe and now usually fails. > > Should one set "kern.sync_on_panic" to zero then? Not a bad idea. It depends on