On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Removing clauses gives maximal diffs and loses even some of the sub-minimal
> > bounds checking (values less than 0 were just errors in some cases, but
> > they are now converted to large unsigned values and
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Tim Robbins wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Labels should be able to handle disks much larger than 1TB (under -current
> > where t
Frustrated With Your Internet Marketing Efforts?
Have you tried:
FREE Classifieds? (Don't work)
Web Site? (Good for closing but you have to have visitors)
Banners? (Expensive and Iffy)
E-Zine? (They're great, but only with thousands of members)
Search Engines (Easy to be buried with thousand
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
* De: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-16 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Sign fixes for disklabel(8) ]
> + u_int v;
> [...]
> + v = strtoul(tp, NULL, 10);
strtoul returns 'unsigned long', not 'unsigned int', and this can
overflow. The type of 'v' is poorly ch
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > In the overflow case, strtoul returns ULONG_MAX. Or if you're interested
> > > in catching invalid characters, use endptr.
> >
> > I'm not that interested i
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Tim Robbins wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > > Here are the diffs to allow disklabel to correctly create partitions >
> > > 1TB (up to 2TB is useful with UFS2) pending a different
David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:29:20PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I've submitted a small patch (bin/45333) for both -stable
> > and -current, but I haven't been able to test it under
> > -current (due to lack of a spare machine). Would someone
> >
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 05:44:01PM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:35:49AM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > Could you try the following?
> >
> > At the boot prompt, before the kernel boots up:
> >
> > unset acpi_load
> > set boot_verbose=YES
> > boot -v
>
> OK, now I
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:29:20PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> I've submitted a small patch (bin/45333) for both -stable
> and -current, but I haven't been able to test it under
> -current (due to lack of a spare machine). Would someone
> please give it a try and let me know if it compiles and
>
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:35:49AM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Could you try the following?
>
> At the boot prompt, before the kernel boots up:
>
> unset acpi_load
> set boot_verbose=YES
> boot -v
OK, now I feel stupid since I could swear that I already did try to
disable ACPI.
But with ACP
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 05:19:19PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Sounds interesting. Either your disks are not found or GEOM is
> not running for some reason. There are really too many possible
> things for me to advise you...
Such as? Go back to that old -current this latop is runnig from J
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anders Andersson wri
tes:
>On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 05:06:50PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> This is actually not from GEOM, look futher down...
>
>There is nothing more related to GEOM, only ACPI and the stuff I already
>pasted.
>
>well: procfs registered
>Timec
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 05:06:50PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> This is actually not from GEOM, look futher down...
There is nothing more related to GEOM, only ACPI and the stuff I already
pasted.
well: procfs registered
Timecounters...
lo0: ...
acpi
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anders Andersson wri
tes:
>On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:52:57PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> Boot with -v and look what geom tells you about your disk.
>
>BIOS Geometries:
> 0:03fdef3f 0..1021=1022 cylinders, 0..239=240 heads, 1..63=63 sectors
> 0 accounted for
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:52:57PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Boot with -v and look what geom tells you about your disk.
BIOS Geometries:
0:03fdef3f 0..1021=1022 cylinders, 0..239=240 heads, 1..63=63 sectors
0 accounted for
--
Anders Andersson
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anders Andersson wri
tes:
>My laptop doesnt like a new kernel with GEOM.
>
>Compaq Evo N400c with a 20GB IBM harddisk.
Boot with -v and look what geom tells you about your disk.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TC
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "sven svenskar" writes:
>I have server i give people shell accounts each in chroot and they need some devices.
>How this work with DEVFS? Should I copy devices from DEVFS with dd or tar? Or I mount
>DEVFS in every chroots? Please help!
current or stable ?
--
Pou
Flag_reda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 03:24:56PM +0100, Alexander Langer wrote:
> [5.0-Release]
> > It's currently shifted to December. The release schedule will be updated
> > soon.
>
> really?
> when, more or less?
>
> /me has to write 128kb of text in the n
I have server i give people shell accounts each in chroot and they need some devices.
How this work with DEVFS? Should I copy devices from DEVFS with dd or tar? Or I mount
DEVFS in every chroots? Please help!
--
__
Sign-up for your own FREE
My laptop doesnt like a new kernel with GEOM.
Compaq Evo N400c with a 20GB IBM harddisk.
Using ACPI, what more information can I provide?
...
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
setrootbyname failed
ffs_rootmount: can't find rootvp
Root mount failed: 6
Manual root filesystem specifiacation:
:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 03:24:56PM +0100, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Paolo Pisati ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > if i remember correctly, 5.0-release was supposed to ship
> > somewhen in november, isn't it?
> > any news on this?
>
> It's currently shifted to December. The release schedule
Hi,
Yesterday I installed a jpsnap (FreeBSD christine.energyhq.tk
5.0-CURRENT-20021115-JPSNAP i386), and tried to setup a RAID0 config
with two disks. raidctl -C goes fine, so does -I and -iv. Then fdisk'ed
and disklabelled. But when I tried to newfs the newly created partition
I started getting a
Thus spake Paolo Pisati ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> if i remember correctly, 5.0-release was supposed to ship
> somewhen in november, isn't it?
> any news on this?
It's currently shifted to December. The release schedule will be updated
soon.
Alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > In the overflow case, strtoul returns ULONG_MAX. Or if you're interested
> > in catching invalid characters, use endptr.
>
> I'm not that interested in catching those cases.. they were not caught
> before an
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Hi,
I've submitted a small patch (bin/45333) for both -stable
and -current, but I haven't been able to test it under
-current (due to lack of a spare machine). Would someone
please give it a try and let me know if it compiles and
works?
The patch adds an option -r to chown(8) and chgrp(1), which
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
> So one thing we could start doing is have sysinstall's adduser stuff offer
> to place new users in the operator group, and set up the default
> permissions on removable devices such that the operator group has
> read/write access to them (or even just re
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:45:16AM -0500, Robert Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this apply generally to all P4's, or just a subset? If all, it may
> be we want to add a P4-workaround to GENERIC so that P4's work better ouf
> of the box. If it's a select few, I wonder if there's some wa
On Friday, 15 November 2002 at 12:05:22 -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>> ===> vinum
>> "Makefile", line 4441: warning: duplicate script for target "geom_bsd.o" ignored
>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>> /h/des/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic79xx_osm.c: In function `ahd_dd
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:50:47PM -0800, Terry Lambert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, this can be CPU specific, but I'm not sure. I'll try to
> > reproduce it on my home P2 system and P3-SMP lying under my desk at
> > work.
>
> How much memory do these systems have?
The P4 system has 128
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > Here are the diffs to allow disklabel to correctly create partitions >
> > 1TB (up to 2TB is useful with UFS2) pending a different partitionning
> > scheme. It also allows you to correc
I've installed fresh -current box and it seems it does not have
/usr/libexec/makewhatis.local script.
How about connecting makewhatis.local to the build? That is shell
script and doesn't require perl.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
(patches not copied)
also two now unneeded occurrences of " (unsigned)v" replaced by "v"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Tim Robbins wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > > Here are the diffs to allow disklabel to correctly create partitions >
> > > 1TB (up to 2TB is useful with UFS2) pending a different p
35 matches
Mail list logo
