Re: i586 FP optimizations hosed.

2001-03-30 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > On 30-Mar-01 David O'Brien wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:45:43AM +0200, Mark Murray wrote: > >> I thought the 586 FP stuff was disabled? > > > > Nope. Depending on how current you are, it was either left broken. > > I commited BDE's fix to exec

Re: ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid... panic for safety

2001-03-30 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >> I really need the complete set of messages printed out prior to the panic. > >Okay, here yer go (transcribed using hi-tech ballpoint and scribbly >handwriting, I'm afraid!) This is certainly a bug, but some things about what you've written make me b

free vnode isn't (DEVFS related)

2001-03-30 Thread Matthew Jacob
Pretty much top of tree today: panic: getnewvnode: free vnode isn't cpuid = 0; lapic.id = Debugger("panic") CPU0 stopping CPUs: 0x0002... stopped. Stopped at Debugger+0x45: pushl %ebx db> t Debugger(c02e3819) at Debugger+0x45 panic(c02e7f38,c0fd8c80,c0339320,c0fd8c80,c8b4b8

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 04:42:48PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > I'll try to spend some more time with it over the weekend, but I > certainly see no objection to committing it as it stands presently. > I *may* try it out on -STABLE (not entirely altruism on my part; it > would make my life simpl

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:35:30 -0800 >From: Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Or am I just being rather denser than usual? >No, you're entirely correct. However, this isn't my fault. ;-) OK; fair enough (and thanks for the reality check). :-} So far, it (the patchset) seems to not br

RE: hmm.... spinlocks..

2001-03-30 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Mar-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> On 30-Mar-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: >> > >> > >> > pic_initialize(): >> > lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x0010 SVR: 0x01ff >> > kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled >> > panic: spi

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 03:51:27PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > One concern, and this may well affect other NIC flavors, is the list of > media types is a little annoying to parse. Hmmm... speaking Perl, I > suppose it could be characterized as > > /^\s+supported media:(\s[\S+(\s)?)+$/

Re: ssh: no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto. See ssl(8).

2001-03-30 Thread George Reid
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Thomas Moestl wrote: > Do you have > device random > in your kernel configuration? Absence of a working random device > triggers this bug. The need for this is also documented in UPDATING. Also, /dev/urandom is now a symlink to /dev/random. A quick "cd /dev; rm urandom; ln -

RE: hmm.... spinlocks..

2001-03-30 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 30-Mar-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > > pic_initialize(): > > lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x0010 SVR: 0x01ff > > kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled > > panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0xc7ba8a60 for > 5 seco

Re: ssh: no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto. See ssl(8).

2001-03-30 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:36:51PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > how does one fix this? *puzzled look* there is no ssl(8) that I can seem > to find to See, and nothing apparent in the UPGRADING file ... system > uptodate as of last night, and mergemaster just finished completing ... > > s

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread David Wolfskill
>From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:07:08 +0200 >Any comments/reviews before we commit the patch to PR25577 ? OK; I've built today's -CURRENT (this time, after applying Brooks' patchset; I had built -CURRENT earlier today). Here's a (slightly sanitized) ifcon

Re: ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid... panic for safety

2001-03-30 Thread Chris Hedley
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > I really need the complete set of messages printed out prior to the panic. Okay, here yer go (transcribed using hi-tech ballpoint and scribbly handwriting, I'm afraid!) Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle ahc0:A:3: ahc_intr - referenced SCB

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:14:13PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? > I've long wished that we could have some of the wireless control stuff > go directly into ifconfig rather than having to run an external > program before bring

RE: hmm.... spinlocks..

2001-03-30 Thread John Baldwin
On 30-Mar-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > pic_initialize(): > lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x0010 SVR: 0x01ff > kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled > panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0xc7ba8a60 for > 5 seconds > cpuid = 0; lapic.id = > Debugger("panic") >

Re: i586 FP optimizations hosed.

2001-03-30 Thread John Baldwin
On 30-Mar-01 David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:45:43AM +0200, Mark Murray wrote: >> I thought the 586 FP stuff was disabled? > > Nope. Depending on how current you are, it was either left broken. > I commited BDE's fix to exeception.s that fixed things for K6-2 users. It looks

ssh: no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto. See ssl(8).

2001-03-30 Thread The Hermit Hacker
how does one fix this? *puzzled look* there is no ssl(8) that I can seem to find to See, and nothing apparent in the UPGRADING file ... system uptodate as of last night, and mergemaster just finished completing ... ssh: no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto. See ssl(8). Disabling protocol ver

Re: new rc.diskless{1,2} files

2001-03-30 Thread Matt Dillon
:> :> On Mar 30, Falco Krepel wrote: :> > I have implemented good ideas from Mike Smith in my :> > rc.diskless{1,2} files and make some other changes: :> :> Hi, :> I don't have access to hardware to test diskless but have a :> few suggestions from looking at proposal. :> :>

Re: ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid... panic for safety

2001-03-30 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>I'm getting these too (I thought it was just me, since it's my first day >of going back to -current after a six month hiatus - I've hit myself with >the clue-stick thoroughly and put it on a different slice this time... but >I digress!) so I can give some additional info, if required. Don't have

Re: ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid... panic for safety

2001-03-30 Thread Chris Hedley
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >Just had one of these on yesterday's -current. Anyone interested in the > >details? > > Nah. Its probably just you, or something specific to your system. > It couldn't possibly be a bug in *my* code. > > ;-) > > Of course I'm interested! I'm getting

usb modems

2001-03-30 Thread Adrian Browne
I was wondering if anyone has had any success with a usb isdn 3com modem or other usb modem types. I have a usb scanner and printer that works great on release 5.0-20010120, but i have failed miserably to get a usb/modem to work. Does anyone know? or could some one advise me of the best approach t

Re: ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid... panic for safety

2001-03-30 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>Hi, > >Just had one of these on yesterday's -current. Anyone interested in the >details? Nah. Its probably just you, or something specific to your system. It couldn't possibly be a bug in *my* code. ;-) Of course I'm interested! -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid... panic for safety

2001-03-30 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, Just had one of these on yesterday's -current. Anyone interested in the details? -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 [EMAIL PROTECTED]fax (0118) 989 4254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jordan Hubbard writes: >Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? As far as I can see, anything short of firmware updates can be done by ifconfig and therefore, presumably, foocontrol can die for 802.11-valued foo. -- Poul-Henning Kamp

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jordan Hubbard writes: : Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? : I've long wished that we could have some of the wireless control stuff : go directly into ifconfig rather than having to run an external : program before bringing up the

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? I've long wished that we could have some of the wireless control stuff go directly into ifconfig rather than having to run an external program before bringing up the interface. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO

Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Any comments/reviews before we commit the patch to PR25577 ? Get the up to date version here: http://www.one-eyed-alien.net/~brooks/FreeBSD/ifconfig.diff -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since

Re: new rc.diskless{1,2} files

2001-03-30 Thread Falco
Mathew KANNER wrote: > > On Mar 30, Falco Krepel wrote: > > I have implemented good ideas from Mike Smith in my > > rc.diskless{1,2} files and make some other changes: > > Hi, > I don't have access to hardware to test diskless but have a > few suggestions from looking at propos

hmm.... spinlocks..

2001-03-30 Thread Matthew Jacob
pic_initialize(): lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x0010 SVR: 0x01ff kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0xc7ba8a60 for > 5 seconds cpuid = 0; lapic.id = Debugger("panic") CPU0 stopping CPUs: 0x0002... stopped. Stopped a

Re: new rc.diskless{1,2} files

2001-03-30 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:38:30PM +0200, Falco Krepel wrote: > I have implemented good ideas from Mike Smith in my > rc.diskless{1,2} files and make some other changes: > > 1. Now I use the kernel flag "vm.nswapdev" to determine if swap is > available. Just a note - this might go away soon beca

new rc.diskless{1,2} files

2001-03-30 Thread Falco Krepel
I have implemented good ideas from Mike Smith in my rc.diskless{1,2} files and make some other changes: 1. Now I use the kernel flag "vm.nswapdev" to determine if swap is available. 2. To determine if DEVFS are used I check the kernel flag "vfs.devfs.generation" as it done within the /etc/rc fil

Re: new rc.diskless{1,2} files

2001-03-30 Thread Mathew KANNER
On Mar 30, Falco Krepel wrote: > I have implemented good ideas from Mike Smith in my > rc.diskless{1,2} files and make some other changes: Hi, I don't have access to hardware to test diskless but have a few suggestions from looking at proposal. BOOTP probably isn't how mo

Re: i586 FP optimizations hosed.

2001-03-30 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:45:43AM +0200, Mark Murray wrote: > I thought the 586 FP stuff was disabled? Nope. Depending on how current you are, it was either left broken. I commited BDE's fix to exeception.s that fixed things for K6-2 users. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "

Donation For Earthquake Relief Work

2001-03-30 Thread Hiren Trivedi
Format Your Message Here Dear Sir, I am enclosing herewith brochure of BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha for your kind consideration. We are from one of the  Centre - Bhavnagar forwarding herewith our genune request for your valuable donation for this work. As you know that Bhavnagar is a one

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP (+sppp)

2001-03-30 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
[Redirected to -net] On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 03:39:40PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On 30 Mar, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > >> What to do in this situation? I didn't want add the defaultroute > >> everytime (POLA). > >> > > But if we don't do this, we may end up using the wrong source IP >

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP (+sppp)

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 30 Mär, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> What to do in this situation? I didn't want add the defaultroute >> everytime (POLA). >> > But if we don't do this, we may end up using the wrong source IP > address. Without my fixes, try this: > > 1) ifconfig isp1 X.X.X.1 > 2) route add default -ifa

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP (+sppp)

2001-03-30 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:36:39PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On 30 Mar, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >> - if I put the interface down the first time after a login I have to > >>readd the defaultroute (only once, after additional "ifconfig > >>down/up" I didn't have to readd the defau

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP (+sppp)

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 30 Mär, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> - if I put the interface down the first time after a login I have to >>readd the defaultroute (only once, after additional "ifconfig >>down/up" I didn't have to readd the defaultroute, it stays) >> > This is only possible if you have a routing daemon r

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP (+sppp)

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 19 Mär, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > 3. The routing code was fixed to delete routes which use non-existent > interface addresses. This code will wipe such a route. > 5. This affects not only ppp(8). Add default route that points to the > LAN; change the IP address on interface; observe

panic with recent kernel..

2001-03-30 Thread Alex Zepeda
The box itself is a dual P2-450, and I was attempting to rebuild a KDE library (ah the joys of doing that), and monitoring stuff with top. The first odd thing I noticed was that some of the processes showed up with an state field (namely sed, and a few others I think). Eventually the box panic'd