>Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:35:30 -0800
>From: Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Or am I just being rather denser than usual?
>No, you're entirely correct. However, this isn't my fault. ;-)....
OK; fair enough (and thanks for the reality check). :-}
So far, it (the patchset) seems to not break anything (which is a
moderately nice characteristic), and it looks to have some very useful
capabilities.
And yes, I think you (Broooks) are correct in judging that the -m (for
displaying the mediaopts, and then one per line) is probably better for
a separate patch.
I'll try to spend some more time with it over the weekend, but I
certainly see no objection to committing it as it stands presently.
I *may* try it out on -STABLE (not entirely altruism on my part; it
would make my life simpler).
Cheers,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to
advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal
amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
