Oh, I think he douched with a molatov cocktail, after his boyfriend fisted him.
>will somebody filter Mr Denninger from the list his >postings are beginning to to
>irritate and look more and >more like the ravings of an offensive lunatic who drank
>too much methanol during new years celebration
* From: Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wow, that was good! I'm going to nominate this for "this century's
most amusing message on the FreeBSD lists" award. :)
Satoshi "you can figure out which century I'm talking about" Asami
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > I'm putting together some specs for a type of firewall appliance using
> > the eventual released version of FreeBSD 4 (targeting 4.x because I need
> > GCC 2.95.x as core compiler). My current machine specs use the
> > following hardware which I am not yet sure will be
will somebody filter Mr Denninger from the list
his postings are beginning to to irritate and look
more and more like the ravings of an offensive lunatic
who drank too much methanol during new years celebrations
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> --> enters stage right
>
> ... opens door ...
> heyy a party! And nobody invited me!
>
> U, Why's the piano broken in two and all the tables
> overturned? Ahhh, whats with all the stares? guys?
--> enters stage right
... opens door ...
heyy a party! And nobody invited me!
U, Why's the piano broken in two and all the tables
overturned? Ahhh, whats with all the stares? guys?
Guys!
exits stage l
I'm bringing this back up to -current to kick around some more. We may
want to move it to -emulators.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > This isn't intended as a 'final solution' :-) The problem is *very*
> > difficult since you're asking the syscall to intuit what the user/progra
> I'm putting together some specs for a type of firewall appliance using
> the eventual released version of FreeBSD 4 (targeting 4.x because I need
> GCC 2.95.x as core compiler). My current machine specs use the
> following hardware which I am not yet sure will be well supported.
>
> FIC PAG-21
Howdy all,
I'm putting together some specs for a type of firewall appliance using
the eventual released version of FreeBSD 4 (targeting 4.x because I need
GCC 2.95.x as core compiler). My current machine specs use the
following hardware which I am not yet sure will be well supported.
FIC PAG-21
Thanks. I would've tried to fix it myself, but I am not too familiar with
programming for a soundcard. I'm only famaliar with the ata driver right
now.
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Syste
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Kip Macy wrote:
>
> Any pointers to web pages on setting up a killfile? The signal to noise
> ratio on this list is dropping rapidly.
I haven't done it myself, but I know that you can read some of the
documentation for procmail (/usr/ports/mail/procmail) and easily
forward c
Hi David,
My post is not really based upon the last Karl vs. Pohl thread.
It is more on what I have observed quietly over the last
few months . If the behavior is left unchecked you can
rest assure that their will be more flares up.
Again, to have waited for Karl to cool off is not
that unrea
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> OK, there is still the static problem with the pcm driver with a ViBRA16X
> soundcard. It also seems that the problem with xmms's analyzer is gone.
> However, now whenever a sound that is shorter than roughly 1 second or so
> plays, it gets cut sh
At 08:20 PM 1/2/00 -0800, David Greenman wrote:
> >He is just expressing his point. From what I can tell someone removed him
> >from the list with no reason and now he is angry. I probably would be too.
>
>That is not at all what happend. Karl went off the deep end about phk
>recommending a Mo
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 09:59:28PM -0600, wrote:
> He is just expressing his point. From what I can tell someone removed him
> from the list with no reason and now he is angry. I probably would be too.
That does not excuse his style of communication. Shouting and
calling people names
>He is just expressing his point. From what I can tell someone removed him
>from the list with no reason and now he is angry. I probably would be too.
That is not at all what happend. Karl went off the deep end about phk
recommending a Motorola GPS to do timekeeping. Then, after a pile of
insu
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Congratulations, Karl. You just proven to the world what a complete
> asshole you really are.
>
> Now get out of here. We don't want you.
Will whoever this is, please stop? There is no valid reason for anonymity
here (and to be honest, in this si
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing
> people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end
> and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on
> him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8)
>
>
> By a long shot t
He is just expressing his point. From what I can tell someone removed him
from the list with no reason and now he is angry. I probably would be too.
Also, I can tell that someone is doing some good covering up. Its ashame to
see leaders do this.
Sam
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PRO
Alright, that was childish and uncalled for. People need to learn to deal
with these kinds of things differently.
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726
Congratulations, Karl. You just proven to the world what a complete asshole you
really are.
Now get out of here. We don't want you.
--
This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at www.no-id.com.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current
>I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing
>people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end
>and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on
>him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8)
>
>
>By a long shot the problem is NOT Karl. It takes at least
>TWO to
> I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing
> people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end
> and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on
> him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8)
I dont think so. Whatever PHK may or may not have done in the pa
>Someone logged into HUB the EDITED me out of the CURRENT mailing list.
As near as I can tell, noone with the ability to su was logged into
hub earlier today when you claim that you were removed. As far as I know,
noone had removed you. I have not seen any messages (other than your
claim) or a
Do you know what the timeline is on this integration?
-Kip
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry for sending this again but when I first sent it -current was
> > embroiled in a flame war.
> >
> > I wou
I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing
people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end
and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on
him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8)
By a long shot the problem is NOT Karl. It takes at least
TWO to engage
Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for sending this again but when I first sent it -current was
> embroiled in a flame war.
>
> I would like to use the latest threads source because my application does
> not work correctly with the signal handling bugs in 3.x's threads.
> However, it do
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> That's not the issue either. Again, someone logged into HUB and
> removed me.
>
> Again, who was su'd or logged into the majordomo account (or any account
> with write access to the list directories) a few hours ago?
This isn't required ... with not
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:55:50PM -0800, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
> From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (message from Karl
> Denninger on Sun, 2 Jan 2000 18:50:17 -0600)
> Sub
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
> Theo split from NetBSD. Again, further ignorance. I suggest you sit down with a
> copy of /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree and read a little history that you seem
> to have missed.
Cool, I never even knew that was there...now I have something to look at
w
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
> a "fluke";
I run/maintain the PostgreSQL mailing lists ... there is a piece of
software that you can "add on" called bouncefilter that auto-unsubscribes
based on various criteria ..
Sorry for sending this again but when I first sent it -current was
embroiled in a flame war.
I would like to use the latest threads source because my application does
not work correctly with the signal handling bugs in 3.x's threads.
However, it does not appear that I can change it without rep
Karl,
Hi, my name is Jonathan Bresler. I am the postmaster for
FreeBSD. Usually, I tend to stay in the background and do the
postmastering. The recent fractious behavior in the mailing lists has
become so galling that I am forced to "come out from behind the
curtain."
Lets se
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Theo was right in splitting off from you folks. I should have followed
> him a couple of years ago and done my own split. Now, its simply not
> worth it.
Not that you'll listen, but: OpenBSD split from NetBSD. FreeBSD is and
always has been a seper
According to Andreas Klemm:
> procmail 3.14 bug, or does the new procmail version introduce
> some new features in area where in -current is something wrong.
> Not easy to say for me ...
Check your locking settings on both versions. You may find that you're using
different locking mechanisms...
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 05:44:57PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
>
> We can point to the Internet's evolution of these "treehouse" organizations
> and show off how PROUD we are of them and those who support them.
> Let's start a nice short list, shall we?
>
> Network Solutions.
> ARIN.
> FreeBSD-
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:08:31PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> As for whoever the person is who force-removed me from the list, trust
> me on this - I won't forget that act, and until you're identified and
> permanently removed from both the list and the entire project you'll
> have no contribu
OK, enough of this, let Karl be on his own for a while. Stop responding,
Karl's too mad to think clearly, and you guys are just baiting
him. Anyone responding is asking for addition to the kill-file.
I already posted this to ports, where the other part of this has
unfortunately spilled into. I
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
> a "fluke";
This does not involve any of the rest of the list subscribers, and I'm
sure the majority of us don't really want to see EITHER side's rantings.
Really, grow up. If you w
On 03-Jan-00 Karl Denninger wrote:
> Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
> a "fluke";
>
> All unsubscribes and subscribes to FreeBSD's lists must be
> authenticated. Majordomo is set to confirm all transactions.
It is still possible for Majordomo to
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 01:32:19PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > The box is a 333MHz PII, with 64M ram. Do I just need more ram to be
> > able to compile in reasonable time, or is something broken?
>
> You probably need more RAM. sql_yacc.cc is one of those "worst-case"
> programs as far as gcc i
Grow up.
-Kip
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
> a "fluke";
>
> All unsubscribes and subscribes to FreeBSD's lists must be
> authenticated. Majordomo is set to confirm all trans
Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
a "fluke";
All unsubscribes and subscribes to FreeBSD's lists must be
authenticated. Majordomo is set to confirm all transactions.
Whoever did this did it directly by logging into Freefall and editing the
maili
Naw, it ain't worth the gas for the chainsaw.
--
This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at www.no-id.com.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Any pointers to web pages on setting up a killfile? The signal to noise
ratio on this list is dropping rapidly.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Doesn't change the facts Gary.
This isn't the first time either Gary.
Plausable deniability isn't going to wash here.
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org
Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for
a plan to do exactly that!
On
In all the years I've known you, Karl, you've always thought you were so far above
everyone else. Apparently, you get off on treating people like shit.
Go away, we don't need your "contributions" here... I'm not sure we ever did.
--
This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at w
Karl Denninger wrote in message ID
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Uh, Matthew, I have the system logs here. I'm root. There was no bounce.
Wrong side of the SMTP transaction Karl. Logs on the receiver mean
*NOTHING*. And you don't have an account, or root, or access to the
majordomo bounce mailbox on
On Sunday, 2 January 2000 at 18:09:37 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:05:22PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, so the treehouse maggots continue to fester, eh?
>>>
>>> Nice move shitheads.
>>>
>>> Do you intend to contin
Uh, Matthew, I have the system logs here. I'm root. There was no bounce.
And yes, I do know how SMTP works too.
Nice try though.
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org
Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for
a plan to do exactl
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:58:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> Karl, I was my hands of this conversation. You aren't listening.
>
> We have custom hardware. We're a control and measurement system. The
> <10ns is needed for that control and measurement part. The sync we
> get of the system cl
Uh, Karl, sometimes majordomo will get rampant and pull one w/o warning if
there was a mail bounce.
It may be a stupid mail robot problem, not a human out to get you. If so,
you've directed your vituperation at the wrong ip address/port combo- try
port 9 instead of port 25.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000,
Karl, I was my hands of this conversation. You aren't listening.
We have custom hardware. We're a control and measurement system. The
<10ns is needed for that control and measurement part. The sync we
get of the system clock, like I said before, is on the order of a few
hundred ns on pentium
Oh, so the treehouse maggots continue to fester, eh?
Nice move shitheads.
Do you intend to continue?
Consider this forwarded to Steve, a withdrawal of my port, and notice of my
intent to post it along with a transcript on my web page for HomeDaemon.
Who is the two-bit-peckerhead who removed my
Hi there!
FOR ANYBODY THAT USES ZIP/PRINTER/PLIP ON THE PARALLEL PORT UNDER -current
A major ppbus(4) release is available for beta-testing.
It includes the port of the ppbus framework to the newbus system.
http://www.freebsd.org/~nsouch/ppbus.html
provides usefull notes about the configurati
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:37:31PM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
>
> > How many millions does Paol have to count in HIS bank as a result of this
> > shilling and "advocacy"?
> >
> > SOME OF US have *REAL* successes to point to - not just bullshit pats on
OK, there is still the static problem with the pcm driver with a ViBRA16X
soundcard. It also seems that the problem with xmms's analyzer is gone.
However, now whenever a sound that is shorter than roughly 1 second or so
plays, it gets cut short. The sound doesn't completely play. I just
thought I'
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 08:00:03PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> A few days ago I updated -current and build /usr/local completely new.
> One remaining problem is, that procmail jobs seems to hang.
> First it was a port problem, I installed some (for me) basic services
> in /home/local and procma
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> How many millions does Paol have to count in HIS bank as a result of this
> shilling and "advocacy"?
>
> SOME OF US have *REAL* successes to point to - not just bullshit pats on the
> back.
Like eDNS, right?
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - B
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:31:22PM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
>
> > Why the hell Walnut Creek wastes their money on your type REMAINS beyond
> > my comprehension.
>
> It really hasn't been a problem for anyone but you. It's more successful,
> then s
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:05:49PM -0800, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> > Now explain to me how stability of your timing source ON THOSE MACHINES
> > is MATERIALLY different to any process WHICH THAT DEVICE MAY INTERACT WITH
> > between 10ns and 1us, AS SEEN FROM THE UNIX MACHINE.
>
> A battle
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Why the hell Walnut Creek wastes their money on your type REMAINS beyond
> my comprehension.
It really hasn't been a problem for anyone but you. It's more successful,
then say, alternative top level domain projects that have gone nowhere.
--
- bill
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:17:59PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
>
> > > If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all
> > > the helpful answers you have gotten so far, you should consider
> > > stopping before you have worn out your wel
Although your interaction is amusing, I subscribe to this mailing list to
keep up to date on -current and not to see the script for the latest
sitcom for geeks.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:13:10PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:53:55PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> ..snip..
> > > If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all
> > > the helpf
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all
> > the helpful answers you have gotten so far, you should consider
> > stopping before you have worn out your welcome.
> >
> > --
> > Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam me
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:53:55PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
..snip..
> > If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all
> > the helpful answers you have gotten so far, you should consider
> > stopping befor
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:50:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
> : Yes, you have HARDWARE timers that do that.
> :
> : So what?
> :
> : I'm talking about TIME SERVERS on UNIX machines.
>
> So am I.
>
> : You know, ntpd and friends? Yes, t
> Now explain to me how stability of your timing source ON THOSE MACHINES
> is MATERIALLY different to any process WHICH THAT DEVICE MAY INTERACT WITH
> between 10ns and 1us, AS SEEN FROM THE UNIX MACHINE.
A battle you would win is if you said, "synchronizing the time of other
UNIX machi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>
>Yes, you have HARDWARE timers that do that.
>
>So what?
I have a commercially available PCI card which costs about the
same as a good diskdrive...
>I'm talking about TIME SERVERS on UNIX machines.
>
>You know, ntpd and friends? Yes, tha
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> >On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> >>
> >> >Why spend twice what Mr. Schwart
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
: Yes, you have HARDWARE timers that do that.
:
: So what?
:
: I'm talking about TIME SERVERS on UNIX machines.
So am I.
: You know, ntpd and friends? Yes, that.
That's one of the things in our application.
: Now explain to me how stabi
I would like to use the latest threads source because my application does
not work correctly with the signal handling bugs in 3.x's threads.
However, it does not appear that I can change it without replacing all of
libc. Is this correct? Or is there some simple change I can make to the
files in li
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:32:00PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
>> : Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
>>
>> Because we need a PPS that is < 10nS from the true st
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>>
>> >Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
>>
>> Well, suit your own political manifests as
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:42:24PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
> : And on what hardware do you think you can obtain 10ns resolution RELIABLY
> : at the software level in the Unix environment and under FreeBSD?
> :
> : Answer: NONE!
>
> WRONG
Hi,
I have a couple of really dumb devices that I use 'tip' to talk to.
One is a Motorola 6811 microcontroller and the other is an old EEPROM
burner. I find that 'tip' overflows these devices when I'm sending
Motorola s-record and Intel Hex formatted files.
It looks like tip's 'cdelay' and 'lde
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
: And on what hardware do you think you can obtain 10ns resolution RELIABLY
: at the software level in the Unix environment and under FreeBSD?
:
: Answer: NONE!
WRONG.
: The actual usable resolution of a timing source is determined by the
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>
>
> >Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
> >
> >For the Motorola name? Sorry, the Batwing Menace to employee's rights was
> >long ago placed on my
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:32:00PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
> : Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
>
> Because we need a PPS that is < 10nS from the true start of second for
> our application? 1uS is really really
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
: Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
Because we need a PPS that is < 10nS from the true start of second for
our application? 1uS is really really bad for the timing geeks in the
audience.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: se
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
>
>For the Motorola name? Sorry, the Batwing Menace to employee's rights was
>long ago placed on my "do not buy, do not recommend, actively boycott" list.
Well, suit your own poli
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 02:33:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
> : That's EXPENSIVE.
>
> Worth every penny. We've seen sub-micro second syncronization with
> our unit on good hardware, and 1-2us on the 486 based hardware.
>
> : Common handhe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes:
: That's EXPENSIVE.
Worth every penny. We've seen sub-micro second syncronization with
our unit on good hardware, and 1-2us on the 486 based hardware.
: Common handheld GPS units with NEMA outputs on them are well under $200
: these days!
N
: >Still no feature freeze for 4.0 BTW?
:
: Feature freeze is in effect I think, but minor upgrades and bugfixes are
: not only allowed, they're mandatory :-)
Jordan told me that the feature freeze was put off until Jan 15.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: I will (as always) recommend the Motorola Oncore UT+. If you buy it
We've also had excellent luck with the OEM version of the Oncore that
we embed in our products.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscrib
Bonsoir,
Well, I don't remember indulging (Lagavulin, Glen Deveron, what else
...), but I'm stumped : I can't reproduce what I've seen : a full "cvs
co" of the ports and src has been running ok till its normal end.
more after some make world's
TfH
Thierry Herbelot wrote:
>
>
> That sucks severely - NONE of the common units have the PPS output?!
>
> Barf. Oh well.
Many of them do, but it's still not meant for precision timekeeping and the
exact relationship between its PPS pulse edges and UTC's second boundaries
may not be precisely specified. It's not a goo
Well, found out, that I don't have any problems using the previous
version of procmail 3.13.1.
So it's solved for me now. The remaining question is, is this a
procmail 3.14 bug, or does the new procmail version introduce
some new features in area where in -current is something wrong.
Not easy to
A few days ago I updated -current and build /usr/local completely new.
One remaining problem is, that procmail jobs seems to hang.
First it was a port problem, I installed some (for me) basic services
in /home/local and procmail tried to call /usr/local/bin/formail.
Now I recompiled procmail usin
That sucks severely - NONE of the common units have the PPS output?!
Barf. Oh well.
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org
Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for
a plan to do exactly that!
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 05:42:24PM +0
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:55:44PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> >BTW, speaking of which, does anyone know of a reasonably-cheap GPS receiver
>> >that (1) has an external-able antenna that will work with somewhere between
>> >50 and
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:55:44PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> >BTW, speaking of which, does anyone know of a reasonably-cheap GPS receiver
> >that (1) has an external-able antenna that will work with somewhere between
> >50 and 100 feet of lead, and (2) has the appropriate pps outputs an
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ollivier Robert writes:
>According to Poul-Henning Kamp:
>> I'm sure Ollivier will upgrade us every so often now :-)
>
>'98i' looks like a nice release candidate and will probably become 4.1.0
>soon. I'll update us to that level of course.
>
>Still no feature freeze
Hello,
I prepared tcp for IPv6 patches to the current.
I would like it to be reviewed and confirmed in many
environment before committing it, because I think updating tcp
code is very critical to system stability.
(Apps for tcp/IPv6 is not yet ready, but I think confirming
that it doesn't harmful
According to Poul-Henning Kamp:
> I'm sure Ollivier will upgrade us every so often now :-)
'98i' looks like a nice release candidate and will probably become 4.1.0
soon. I'll update us to that level of course.
Still no feature freeze for 4.0 BTW?
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Ser
>BTW, speaking of which, does anyone know of a reasonably-cheap GPS receiver
>that (1) has an external-able antenna that will work with somewhere between
>50 and 100 feet of lead, and (2) has the appropriate pps outputs and such
>so it can be used for this?
I will (as always) recommend the Motor
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>
> >> >Well... that won't help the 20 or so boxes here doing this all the
> >> >time:
> >> >Jan 1 11:26:46 gndrsh xntpd[133]: time reset (step) -0.217546 s
> >> >Jan 1 11
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>
> >> >> Anyway, ntpd4 is in CURRENT...
> >> >
> >> >Now it is.
> >> >
> >> >And it works correctly too.
> >>
> >> In general yes, but not if you use the hardpps() with
Hello,
I'm rebuilding my -Current box.
it's been reinstalled anew from the FreeBSD 4.0-19991229-CURRENT
snapshot.
I have on another box the full repository of FreeBSD (source, ports,
docs, ...) on another box, running 3.3-Stable and exporting the
repository via NFS.
I've tried to remake the wo
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
