On Sat, 21 Aug 1999 19:11:33 MST, Doug wrote:
> I have a 3.2-Stable and a 4.0-Current system at home, both
> running rc5des. On both systems I set the priority in the rc5 options
> menu to '0', indicating lowest possible priority. On the -Stable
> system it's running at nice level '0', b
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999 16:59:38 MST, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/~jkh/etc.diffs.fix-it-right
>
> Which I've sent to Sheldon for review but haven't heard anything
> back from him yet.
Universal Week-end Time. :-P
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
I had a recent crash on my home box that makes me question the reliablity
of softupdates. My home box runs 3.2-R, but as far as I can determine,
there have been no reliablity fixes to softupdates since then. So a failure
here should be relevant to -current.
Hardware: K6-2/300, 64MB ECC SDRAM, F
It seems Nicolas Souchu wrote:
> acd0: CDROM drive at ata0 as master
> acd0: drive speed 0KB/sec
> acd0: supported read types:
> acd0: Mechanism: caddy
> acd0: Medium: CD-ROM unknown medium
>
> Any clue?
>
> The drive was running flawlessly with the old wdc driver and with various
> primary rel
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 11:59:05 MST, Doug wrote:
> However I'd REALLY like to emphasize again that if we're going to do
> this the proper fix is to use case wherever possible.
>
> I have offered several times to do the work if it has a chance of
> being committed, that offer is still good.
Hi Dou
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 02:49:49PM -0700, william woods wrote:
> OK, this is kinda a crazy questions, but..what the hell
>
...snip...
> How possible is it to cvsup stable ( I would blow away /uusr/src
> first) and then do a make world and have a 3.2-stable system or should
> I just re-insta
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> >
> > > According to Narvi:
> > > > "Falling letters like in the movie with red bills"
> > >
> > > Pill :)
> > >
> > > That very important... The screensaver triggered me to see the movie
> >
Richard Cownie wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Are you saying 4.17 is better than 4.18 for debugging C++? Or are you
> > saying you didn't know FreeBSD comes with gdb:
>
> gdb-4.18 is badly broken on all platforms (at least for C++). You can't
> call methods from the gdb c
Anyways, I have to agree with you on the protocol issue. I cannot even
get mounts to work reliably between the Linux boxes, they seem to get
confused. Basically, looks like recent Linux NFS Server is broken,
therefore, I'm guessing that the error I saw was on that side of the
house.
FYI, my Bon
> On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote:
>
> > According to Narvi:
> > > "Falling letters like in the movie with red bills"
> >
> > Pill :)
> >
> > That very important... The screensaver triggered me to see the movie
> > again. A. I love it.
>
> Yeah, it's gotta be the perfect hacke
:linux> cp multipatch-1.diff test1
:fbsd> cat test1
:cat: test1: RPC struct is bad
:fbsd> cp test1 /tmp
:fbsd> cat test1
:
:+ (vp->v_object->flags & OBJ_MIGHTBEDIRTY)) {
:
:^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@
:^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@
Tattr wrote:
>
> Hi
> i wonder if you can help me please?
> my friend has just bought a cam for his pc
> its a webstar and we are having a problem
> we have loaded the cd and the cam wont work cos it keeps saying video
> capture devise missing
> i have the same cam as he and instakked it the same
linux> cp multipatch-1.diff test1
fbsd> cat test1
cat: test1: RPC struct is bad
fbsd> cp test1 /tmp
fbsd> cat test1
+ (vp->v_object->flags & OBJ_MIGHTBEDIRTY)) {
^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@
^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 10:24:33PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> That's what I'm thinking but compiling NFS into the kernel "fixed" my
> panic. The weird part is that I'm still using INVARIANT. I don't see why the
> condition is not met when compiling all these together and is when using the
> k
> As of a few days ago, ppp(8) supports the -nat flag (as well as
> the -alias flag for backwards compatibility), however, it's not
> clear that we really want to go the whole hog and change the
> library name & interface too.
I've been on both sides of this issue, to be sure, but I have to sa
This topic was discussed last January - should libalias be renamed to
libnat ?
As of a few days ago, ppp(8) supports the -nat flag (as well as
the -alias flag for backwards compatibility), however, it's not
clear that we really want to go the whole hog and change the
library name & interface
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Narvi wrote:
> If we wanted to be legally paranoid we would call it the "letter" saver
> and add as the comment the words
>
> "Falling letters like in the movie with red bills"
Red pills, rather?
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons c
: fbsd> cat /test1 local1
Oops. I obviously meant to redirect the output for the cat's:
fbsd> cat /test1 > local1
.. etc...
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curren
:When copying over (FreeBSD client) the multipatch from a Linux (2.2.11)
:box before the patch I got this garbage in the file, -current as of 4am
:this morning. gzip'ed version has bad crc's. Went the other way and it
:worked fine (Linux client), this is v2 via amd.
:
:...
:Update: after reboot
Hi
i wonder if you can help me please?
my friend has just bought a cam for his pc
its a webstar and we are having a problem
we have loaded the cd and the cam wont work cos it keeps saying video
capture devise missing
i have the same cam as he and instakked it the same way
i went into my control pa
When copying over (FreeBSD client) the multipatch from a Linux (2.2.11)
box before the patch I got this garbage in the file, -current as of 4am
this morning. gzip'ed version has bad crc's. Went the other way and it
worked fine (Linux client), this is v2 via amd.
/etc/amd.conf:
**
/d
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 11:46:14PM +0200, Nick Hibma wrote:
> > Tell them there will be a reference to the movie web site or something. ;-)
> Or tell them that the URL to the website appears once in a while in the
> mishmash, sublimal advertisements. Just make sure you speak to the
> marketing dro
Hello,
I'm committing an update of the PicoBSD code tree that should allow it to
build on -STABLE and take advantage of loader's new features.
Luigi Rizzo did the majority of the work, I debugged. I have use of this
code thus why I'm sponsoring this commit.
Significant changes include:
. No
> > Maybe we *should* go approach the producers? I have gone to that movie
> > several times, and I keep on enjoying it, so this is GOOD PR for them.
>
> Tell them there will be a reference to the movie web site or something. ;-)
Or tell them that the URL to the website appears once in a while
OK, this is kinda a crazy questions, but..what the hell
We have a production machiene that runs our internal mail server that I just
inherited sysadmin'ing (the other guy quit). The problem is that it is
currently running 4.0-current. I like current, I run it on my test system at
home, but I
> This is just my opinion though, and not to be used as legal advice for
> anyone. I just don't want FreeBSD to become a ball of intellectual property
> infringements. :)
And to be honest, you are arguing well. It's also fairly easy to
implement a patchset for this and keep the source separate,
Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote:
>
> > According to Narvi:
> > > "Falling letters like in the movie with red bills"
> >
> > Pill :)
> >
> > That very important... The screensaver triggered me to see the movie
> > again. A. I love it.
>
> Yeah, it's gotta b
> For the immediate future, it looks like it will -- it seems as though
> we don't have the man power to make the necessary changes to sysinstall
> to support "installing the docs as packages", so I'm going to fix up
> src/release/Makefile as necessary to cope with the new directory structure.
I
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Narvi:
> > "Falling letters like in the movie with red bills"
>
> Pill :)
>
> That very important... The screensaver triggered me to see the movie
> again. A. I love it.
Yeah, it's gotta be the perfect hacker's movie.
Maybe we
According to Narvi:
> "Falling letters like in the movie with red bills"
Pill :)
That very important... The screensaver triggered me to see the movie
again. A. I love it.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #7
According to Greg Lehey:
> In all likelihood, these options didn't "cause" the panic, they just
> made another bug more visible. That's what they're there for.
That's what I'm thinking but compiling NFS into the kernel "fixed" my
panic. The weird part is that I'm still using INVARIANT. I don't s
Hi there, hi Soren,
First of all, the dump.
Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0302000.
Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug
Probing for PnP devices:
npx0: on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
apm0: on motherboard
apm: found APM BIOS version 1.2
pcib0: on motherb
:
:>So what do we do when we halt or reboot ?
:
:We unmount the file system. dounmount() calls VFS_SYNC() with the
:MNT_WAIT flag, and then (for ffs) ffs_unmount() calls ffs_flushfiles()
:or softdep_flushfiles(). I'm not sure why the latter is necessary.
:
:I don't understand this problem. syn
Chris Piazza wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 03:07:44PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > > > I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that
> > > > gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to
> > > > keep gcc in the source now.
> > >
> >
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 03:07:44PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > > I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that
> > > gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to
> > > keep gcc in the source now.
> >
> > If you are tracking -current,
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
> Are you saying 4.17 is better than 4.18 for debugging C++? Or are you
> saying you didn't know FreeBSD comes with gdb:
gdb-4.18 is badly broken on all platforms (at least for C++). You can't
call methods from the gdb command line, and also it frequent
[ cc'd to -current ]
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 07:54:51PM -0400, jack wrote:
>
> Will support for building release docs in English only be
> revived?
>
For the immediate future, it looks like it will -- it seems as though
we don't have the man power to make the necessary changes to sysinstall
to
>So what do we do when we halt or reboot ?
We unmount the file system. dounmount() calls VFS_SYNC() with the
MNT_WAIT flag, and then (for ffs) ffs_unmount() calls ffs_flushfiles()
or softdep_flushfiles(). I'm not sure why the latter is necessary.
I don't understand this problem. sync() intent
yes and no.
the sync wheel indicates buffers to wrrite
in an order that will probably ensure that early dependencies are
satisfied before later ones, however even after being written,
a buffer might have remaining unsatisfied dependencies that
required that teh on disk and in momory version sstil
> > I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that
> > gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to
> > keep gcc in the source now.
>
> If you are tracking -current, you should be reading the commit messages.
>
> egcs has become gcc.
I must ha
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> I do not know if it is bug or feature, but it seems that sync(8) command
> doesn't really flushing write buffers for softdep enabled f/s. IMHO this
> behavior is not very friendly for the notebooks and ATX owners because
> before putting computer into
So what do we do when we halt or reboot ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
:
:But the buffer to buffer dependencies are already recorded in the
:sequence on the "sync-wheel" which the syncer daemon runs through,
:isn't it ?
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
Only
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes:
>:>structures used internally by softupdates are not condusive to doing a
>:>hard-sync.
>:
>:I gues sync needs to set a flag which makes the sync'er go through all
>:buckets with no delay and then wake the sync'ing process afterwards..
:>structures used internally by softupdates are not condusive to doing a
:>hard-sync.
:
:I gues sync needs to set a flag which makes the sync'er go through all
:buckets with no delay and then wake the sync'ing process afterwards...
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam memb
> I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that
> gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to
> keep gcc in the source now.
If you are tracking -current, you should be reading the commit messages.
egcs has become gcc.
--
\\ The mind's the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes:
>
>It's a bug, one that I've brought up with Kirk. The problem is that the
>structures used internally by softupdates are not condusive to doing a
>hard-sync.
I gues sync needs to set a flag which makes the sync'er go through all
I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that
gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to
keep gcc in the source now.
Kenneth Culver
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the messag
:I do not know if it is bug or feature, but it seems that sync(8) command
:doesn't really flushing write buffers for softdep enabled f/s. IMHO this
:behavior is not very friendly for the notebooks and ATX owners because
:before putting computer into sleep mode OS preferably should try to
:write as
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I hate to keep bringing things like this up, or start a legal war,
> > but this
> > > > screensaver is more than likely a copyright and/
At 06:44 PM 8/22/99 +0200, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
>
>[trademark violation warning]
>
>Ok, maybe you have a point - I dont know, I'm not a lawyer. But with this
>line of reasoning they could claim that anything using falling letters
>effect on your screen par
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
[trademark violation warning]
Ok, maybe you have a point - I dont know, I'm not a lawyer. But with this
line of reasoning they could claim that anything using falling letters
effect on your screen partly violates they trademarked special effect,
which is sil
Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> Ah, If you want to reject the standby request from BIOS while the
> system is active, then apmd would be useful. You can configure it like
> this:
> in /etc/apmd.conf:
> apm_event PMEV_STANDBYREQ {
> reject;
Thanks.
> I guess your disks are still in a SLEEP aft
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> Well, the issue with converting many of the macros to inline functions
> :> is with the embedded goto's and references to variables defined outside
> :> the macros. Converting them to functions would basically require
> :> rewriti
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
> > : Seriously though, I'm in the process of replacing a number of the
> > : ad-hoc event handler callout lists in the kernel (most notably the
> > : at_shutdown and apm* lists) with a generic implemen
>On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I hate to keep bringing things like this up, or start a legal war,
> but this
> > > screensaver is more than likely a copyright and/or trademark
> violation, and
> > > bringing it into the
About the vnconfig/disklabel problem, i don't understand one thing: the
sequence that causes the reboot is the same used to produce the
boot floppy images. How comes that it is still possible to produce
snapshots for -current ? Are they cross-built on an older version
of the system ?
che
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
>
> >
> > I hate to keep bringing things like this up, or start a legal war, but this
> > screensaver is more than likely a copyright and/or trademark violation, and
> > bringing it into the source tree may
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
> A> Anyway, this module was meant more as a joke, but if you guys like it so
> > > much you could vote for putting it in the tree...
> >
> >What do you mean "vote"? I was waiting for it to show up on my tree
> >after a cvsup!
>
> I hate to keep bringing thi
I do not know if it is bug or feature, but it seems that sync(8) command
doesn't really flushing write buffers for softdep enabled f/s. IMHO this
behavior is not very friendly for the notebooks and ATX owners because
before putting computer into sleep mode OS preferably should try to
write as many
On Saturday, 21 August 1999 at 22:30:54 -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote:
>> I'm generating a core dump. Please note that as tara is my test machine, I use
>> "INVARIANT" & "INVARIANT_SUPPORT". Should I remove them ?
>>
>> It seems that from my reading of the code, the panic would not had happened
>> witho
> > Anyway, this module was meant more as a joke, but if you guys like it so
> > much you could vote for putting it in the tree...
>
> It's extremely small, so why not? Got my vote. :-)
Yes, you have my 7 votes as well (my department thinks it is cool as
well. Or at least that is what I think t
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >>Hmmm, I know this is your code, but are you sure? 8-). My understanding of
> >>dkmodslice() and friends is that they manipulate dev_t entries, but don't
> >>actually initialise them. Since th
63 matches
Mail list logo
