In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>>>: It seems that our new boot blocks doesn't like the taste of disks
>>>: prepared according to the meagre information we have in the handbook.
>>>
>>>How does this script differ from 'disklabel -w wd0 auto'? It does do
>>>the fdisk stuff (you
>>: It seems that our new boot blocks doesn't like the taste of disks
>>: prepared according to the meagre information we have in the handbook.
>>
>>How does this script differ from 'disklabel -w wd0 auto'? It does do
>>the fdisk stuff (your script, not the disklabel command).
>
>It differs in th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>: It seems that our new boot blocks doesn't like the taste of disks
>: prepared according to the meagre information we have in the handbook.
>
>How does this script differ from 'disklabel
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: It seems that our new boot blocks doesn't like the taste of disks
: prepared according to the meagre information we have in the handbook.
How does this script differ from 'disklabel -w wd0 auto'? It does do
the fdisk stuff (your script,
Peter Mutsaers wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> After Linux I gave FreeBSD a try again, when I saw some improvements
> to APM had been committed.
>
> I hoped for a real suspend mode, but alas. Now I'm wondering what
> makes the difference, and whether I could do it myself.
>
> Let me explain: I run my (d
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>In FreeBSD, when I activate suspend mode, I see the light on my
>computer blinking, indicating it has gone into suspend mode, but still
>there is no reduction in noise whatsoever. The disks keep spinning,
>the CPU fan (or whatever) too. I could activate th
I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one processor.
I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and there was a
solution, I think it involved a patch.
Any pointers?
--
David Cross | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator/Resea
Hello,
After Linux I gave FreeBSD a try again, when I saw some improvements
to APM had been committed.
I hoped for a real suspend mode, but alas. Now I'm wondering what
makes the difference, and whether I could do it myself.
Let me explain: I run my (desktop) computer in the living room. I
don'
It seems Mike Hoskins wrote:
> and I just installed a Promise Ultra66. Here's my relevant kernel config
> stuff (following LINT's example):
>
> pci0: unknown card DBZ4d38 (vendor=0x105a, dev=0x4d38) at 14.0 irq 9
Thats the promise controller, try the ata driver instead an use the
following patc
> > There aren't too many systems any more that don't have an additional
> > 30 MB for the time it takes to build the kernel, and it solves a
> > whole lot of potential problems.
>
> It does cause problems when you keep the kernels for 8 different machines
> in one /usr/src.
You are obiviously k
> I don´t know, which daemon writes to /var/run/utmp.
>
> Maybe I should notice, that I´m logged in via ssh.
Was this version of ssh built on a 4.0 system, or 2.x? Usernames went
from 8 chars to 16 chars. I was experiencing simular problems when I
upgraded from 2.2.x to 3.0.
--
-- David(
> 1) Can I use the 3.2 packages with FreeBSD 4.0 or am I doing a stupid thing?
Kinda. We provide different versions at
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/ because of there are some
library difference between 3.x and 4.0. Not to mention anything that
grubs around in the kernel.
> 2)
Hello,
Just cvsup'd and running...
FreeBSD snafu.adept.org 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Aug 5 04:51:08
PDT 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/SNAFU i386
I have the following onboard...
ide_pci0: at device 7.1 on pci0
and I just installed a Promise Ultra66. Here's m
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
> I'm messing around with the latest mesa and have discovered (suprise)that our
> assembler doesn't support 3dnow instructions. Are there any plans to update to
> a version of binutils that does? Linux's stuff ap
On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 10:10:49AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > So... IMHO, if we can fix this as well, it would be worth it for all
> > the people who get core dumps but didn't build debug kernels.
> > Do you disagree?
>
> I disagree that this should even be necessary. This kind of detail
> wa
Thus spake Alexander Langer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> root p0 0.10 04Nov35 - (w)
> bash-2.02# date
> Tue Aug 3 14:26:47 CEST 1999
> Take a look at the last one: p0. I logged in ~5 min before.
> The date confuses me.
I took a further look into the sources. usr.bi
I recently downloaded and installed the most recent FreeBSD 4.0 -CURRENT,
skipping the
packages' download because of the size (I have the latest 3.2 CDROMs).
The problem is that some packages (linux_base, in example), are missing from
the 3.2 CDs and also that every time FreeBSD 4.0 complains abo
17 matches
Mail list logo
