Grabbed another -current, and are still seeing a few problems yet that Matt
and others haven't solved. I'm not pushing anyone, just reminding that these
are still here, and still problems.
1) The 'inode/vmopar' lockup that Matt is aware of, and apparently tracked
down.
2) Processes starting to
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Don Read wrote:
>
> Are you guys serious about dropping the box by powering off the console ?
>
>
Suns do this. They sense the terminal power off as a break. One
previous ork place had a bunch of rack mounted suns, sharing a
serial console via a switch box. There was a
On 10-Jun-99 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Mike Nowlin wrote:
>
>> > > key to drop to the debugger? Say have it so that if a keystroke of ~b
>> > > (as
>> >
>> > Would be most excellent if this could be done. A couple of boxen I
>> > have here have serial consoles attached to
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> Could you narrow down the crash further inside mp_start()? I'd like to
> know whether the crash occurred inside start_all_aps(). One or two lines of
> debug messages would be really helpful, you don't have to write down the exact
> words. Do you have options
> I have added more debugging messages, and the crash appears to be inside
> mp_start(). I don't have a log because this is too early in the boot
> to get the messages saved anywhere, and they go by too quickly to
> write it down. The evidence that this is an SMP problem is simple -
> with 2 cpu
On Wed, 09 Jun 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> > I've been trying to install 19990604-CURRENT on a couple of SC450NX
> > boxes. It works fine with 2 cpu's, but an SMP kernel with 4 cpu's
> > falls over very quickly (I think while it's setting up the APIC
> > stuff, or very shortly after - the messages a
> Would be most excellent if this could be done. A couple of boxen I
> have here have serial consoles attached to other machines which
> do a very good simulation of a break when the controlling process
> leaves them. Dropping to DDB every time you reboot the other machine
> is, uh, less than desi
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Did try this...actually went to the Livingston WWW site, and they "fixed
> this bug" around release 3.1.4 of ComOS :( The 'send break' just gets
> ignored...
The bug they fixed was that sending a telnet BRK sequence during an
administrative session
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Mike Nowlin wrote:
> > > key to drop to the debugger? Say have it so that if a keystroke of ~b (as
> >
> > Would be most excellent if this could be done. A couple of boxen I
> > have here have serial consoles attached to other machines which
> > do a very good simulation of
Mike Nowlin wrote:
> Agreed, but this may be quite a project... doing a "cd ~bob" would be
> fun. :) You would pretty much have to implement some timing
> requirements, but I imagine that it could bulk up that section of the
> kernel pretty easily.
Yep. I started to hack something like this int
Julian Elischer writes:
>
> TONY
>
> they just showed your obfuscated C entry in the COmpetitionhere..
> Your'e crazy you know..
> there were soma amazing entries but you came in near the top..
Wow. That's the first news I've had about this since submitting
it. Now I can sit back and look smu
11 matches
Mail list logo
