On Sun, 30 May 1999, John Polstra wrote:
> There were other objections which were serious to make me (hang on
> a second -- where is that CVSupMeister cap ... ah, there we go,
> it's in place now) decide not to do it. One objection was that a
> mirror might have been network-isolated from the mas
>> Actually, it works on a Celeron but fails on a P5. This is caused by the
>> following bug suite (in approximately historical order):
>> 1) IRQ13 interface was broken as designed.
>> 2) Intel F00F bug.
>> 3) Probe for (1) is not very well implemented. It hacks on the idt[]
>>global to conte
>The problem is following:
>
>FS driver recieves VOP_FSYNC request,
>then it scan the queue and pick up dirty buffers to
>bwrite(bp) them. bwrite calls VOP_STRATEGY,
>FS's strategy routine is trying to VOP_BMAP buf, and
>fails (suppose it fails), then xxfs_strategy do:
>
> bp->b_error = erro
In the last episode (May 30), John Polstra said:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> > A simple round-robin DNS for all the active cvsup servers should
> > suffice; make it cvsup.freebsd.org, stick it back in the sample
> > cvsup config files, and put a comment mentioning that if you only
> > cvsup once a day or
On Sun, 30 May 1999, John Polstra wrote:
> There were other objections which were serious to make me (hang on
> a second -- where is that CVSupMeister cap ... ah, there we go,
> it's in place now) decide not to do it. One objection was that a
> mirror might have been network-isolated from the mas
Dan Nelson wrote:
> A simple round-robin DNS for all the active cvsup servers should
> suffice; make it cvsup.freebsd.org, stick it back in the sample cvsup
> config files, and put a comment mentioning that if you only cvsup once
> a day or less it will work fine.
>
> I think the only complaint ab
In the last episode (May 30), Kris Kennaway said:
> On Sat, 29 May 1999, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
> > FYI.. cvsup5.freebsd.org (2xXeon, also wearing the hat of cvsup4)
> > is also still not at capacity and welcomes anyone in need of CVSup
> > services, updates are also hourly from freefall.
>
> I wa
> Actually, it works on a Celeron but fails on a P5. This is caused by the
> following bug suite (in approximately historical order):
> 1) IRQ13 interface was broken as designed.
> 2) Intel F00F bug.
> 3) Probe for (1) is not very well implemented. It hacks on the idt[]
>global to context swi
Hi!
The problem is following:
FS driver recieves VOP_FSYNC request,
then it scan the queue and pick up dirty buffers to
bwrite(bp) them. bwrite calls VOP_STRATEGY,
FS's strategy routine is trying to VOP_BMAP buf, and
fails (suppose it fails), then xxfs_strategy do:
bp->b_error = error;
http://www.smartsurf.net/clients/medicalcenter
Some people may find this subject a bit offensive, but the truth of the matter
is Viagra from Pfizer has truly helped many people and even saved marriages.
The only problem in the past was that in order to get a prescription for this
marriage-savi
dfr>>> Is cardbus work in progress ??
dfr>>> And will newbus designed drivers work without larger modifications ?
dfr>>
dfr>>Cardbus will happen after pccard is cleaned up a bit. Warner Losh is
dfr>>working hard on pccard at the moment. I think that a newbus pci driver
dfr>>(or even an old pci dri
On Sun, 30 May 1999, Nicolai Petri wrote:
> Is cardbus work in progress ??
> And will newbus designed drivers work without larger modifications ?
Cardbus will happen after pccard is cleaned up a bit. Warner Losh is
working hard on pccard at the moment. I think that a newbus pci driver
(or even a
On 30 May 99, at 18:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I'm sure there are many people who aren't using the optimal server for
> their network location.
FWIW: I had someone in the Netherlands using cvsup.nz.freebsd.org for a
bit. They claimed better times than stuff like Dallas or someething.
cvsup,
On Sat, 29 May 1999, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
> FYI.. cvsup5.freebsd.org (2xXeon, also wearing the hat of cvsup4) is also
> still not at capacity and welcomes anyone in need of CVSup services, updates
> are also hourly from freefall.
I was wondering the other day about the feasibility of setting u
Is cardbus work in progress ??
And will newbus designed drivers work without ´larger modifications ?
-
Nicolai Petri
n...@swamp.dk
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Thanks. End of discussion. If I am able to tidy up parts of PAO I will do
just that.
-Kip
On Sun, 30 May 1999, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 11:59:35PM -0700, k...@lyris.com wrote:
> > That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being fl
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 11:59:35PM -0700, k...@lyris.com wrote:
> That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being flamed for a
> reasonable question about something that is not documented in an obvious
> place.
Check the archives for freebsd-current, freebsd-hackers and freebsd-mobil
That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being flamed for a
reasonable question about something that is not documented in an obvious
place.
Is it something that I can help with? Or is it more a political issue? Can
you send me a pointer to something that goes into more detail?
I wil
In message , k...@lyris.com write
s:
>Why can't the PAO changes be committed to the main source tree?
Because they are, technically speaking, a messy hack.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
p...@freebsd.org "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD
19 matches
Mail list logo
