Re: FBSDBOOT.EXE

1999-05-11 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 11 May 1999, Carlos C. Tapang wrote: > Because I need it, I have upgraded fbsdboot.exe so now it can recognize ELF. > If anybody else needs it, please let me know and I'll see what I can do for > you. > ps. I had to use my old Microsoft Visual C++ (ver 1.5) to do this > modific

Re: Incorrect memory sizes reported

1999-05-11 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 11 May 1999, Kevin Day wrote: > I'm not sure if this is related to the bug I found in 3.1, regarding mmaping > devices, then forking, but with my -current NFS server: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 139 root 2 0 257M

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c

1999-05-11 Thread NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa
> Because 4.4BSD got it wrong. It has always been the belief of the > FreeBSD Project's management that 4.4's totally-static configuration No! 4.4BSD mechanism is good. Newconfig already support dynamic configuration and *good* module support (not yet merge newconfig CVS). > mechanism was unacce

/usr/src/release/Makefile patch

1999-05-11 Thread John W. DeBoskey
Hi, Could you please consider the following patch to /usr/src/release/Makefile? It may not be entirely correct, but it allows a 'cd /usr/src/release && make release' to run to completion. In the kernel makefile, 'kernel' is not a target, ${KERNEL} is, and ${KERNEL} has the value 'GENERIC'.

Re: tosha after CAM changes

1999-05-11 Thread Eric Hodel
I must have missed a step making world, so everything works just fine now. Thanks for the concern. -- Eric Hodel hodel...@seattleu.edu "If you understand what you're doing, you're not learning anything." -- A. L. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe fre

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c

1999-05-11 Thread NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa
> For the sake of the thread, this got committed a day or two ago, and these > hacks have been replaced with a low priority match. Why do you use another mechanism of 4.4BSD ? Don't loss time and loss inter-operability between other BSDs. -- NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp

Re: FBSDBOOT.EXE

1999-05-11 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, At 15:22 11/05/99 -0700, you wrote: >Because I need it, I have upgraded fbsdboot.exe so now it can recognize ELF. >If anybody else needs it, please let me know and I'll see what I can do for >you. I'm going to have a use for it RSN >ps. I had to use my old Microsoft Visual C++ (ver 1.5) to d

Re: the new config and booting

1999-05-11 Thread Mike Smith
> I switched to the new config(8) today, where the ``config kernel root on..'' > line is no longer tolerated in the config file. > > I now have to ``boot -r'' to avoid a `can't mount root' panic. This wasn't > necessary before. > > I know I can probably put something into /boot/ to automate this.

Re: de driver problem

1999-05-11 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Doug Rabson wrote ... > On Mon, 10 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah. That must be why my 164lx won't netboot. > > > > Could well be. My Aspen Alpine refused to with a DE500. A DE435 (10mbit > > only) worked just dandy. > > That reminds me. Does your Alpine still work after the

Nt source licenses...

1999-05-11 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Hi, maybe i am the last one in the world to know, but were you guys aware of this: http://research.microsoft.com/programs/NTSrcLicInfo.htm Microsoft makes Windows NT source code available to universities and other "not-for-profit" research institutions at no charge. Currently, there a

problem with dev_t changes and pageout..

1999-05-11 Thread Peter Wemm
It looks like something has come unstuck: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode mp_lock = 0002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = fault virtual address = 0x28 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc017bb67 stack pointer =

Re: FBSDBOOT.EXE

1999-05-11 Thread Carlos C. Tapang
Because I need it, I have upgraded fbsdboot.exe so now it can recognize ELF. If anybody else needs it, please let me know and I'll see what I can do for you. ps. I had to use my old Microsoft Visual C++ (ver 1.5) to do this modification. Carlos C. Tapang http://www.genericwindows.com -Original

Re: Incorrect memory sizes reported

1999-05-11 Thread Kevin Day
> > This is normal. It's using a lot of virtual memory. Fortunately, virtual > memory is cheap. > > DS > > > I'm not sure if this is related to the bug I found in 3.1, > > regarding mmaping > > devices, then forking, but with my -current NFS server: > > > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE S

RE: Incorrect memory sizes reported

1999-05-11 Thread David Schwartz
This is normal. It's using a lot of virtual memory. Fortunately, virtual memory is cheap. DS > I'm not sure if this is related to the bug I found in 3.1, > regarding mmaping > devices, then forking, but with my -current NFS server: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE

Incorrect memory sizes reported

1999-05-11 Thread Kevin Day
I'm not sure if this is related to the bug I found in 3.1, regarding mmaping devices, then forking, but with my -current NFS server: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 139 root 2 0 257M 452K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% rpc.statd 257M? :) ps sho

Re: Tonight make world failed at isdnmonitor...

1999-05-11 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Hellmuth Michaelis: > hellmuth BTW do you plan to import i4b 0.80 into CURRENT ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #71: Sun May 9 20:16:32 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebs

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c

1999-05-11 Thread Peter Wemm
Doug Rabson wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 1999, NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa wrote: > > > > I was thinking of doing this, the same as alpm and intpm: > > > > > > case 0x: > > > #if NUHCI > 0 > > > return NULL; > > > #else > > > return "VIA blah USB controller"; > > > #endif > > > > It depends on old-con

Re: the new config and booting

1999-05-11 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <199905111939.vaa02...@peedub.muc.de>, Gary Jennejohn writes: >I switched to the new config(8) today, where the ``config kernel root on..'' >line is no longer tolerated in the config file. > >I now have to ``boot -r'' to avoid a `can't mount root' panic. This wasn't >necessary before. >

the new config and booting

1999-05-11 Thread Gary Jennejohn
I switched to the new config(8) today, where the ``config kernel root on..'' line is no longer tolerated in the config file. I now have to ``boot -r'' to avoid a `can't mount root' panic. This wasn't necessary before. I know I can probably put something into /boot/ to automate this. Just thought

Re: de driver problem

1999-05-11 Thread Doug Rabson
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > Yeah. That must be why my 164lx won't netboot. > > Could well be. My Aspen Alpine refused to with a DE500. A DE435 (10mbit > only) worked just dandy. That reminds me. Does your Alpine still work after the new-bus stuff? I wasn't sure I hadn't brok

Re: somebody has broken sysctlbyname() in -current

1999-05-11 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
On Sat, 8 May 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > It's interesting that the ANSI emulation in loader(8) is good enough to do > full-screen displays. It still seems to make sense to move userconfig-like > functionality into the pre-kernel stages including moving config(8)'s hints > to a loaded and parsed fi

Scanners

1999-05-11 Thread Tomer Weller
i got a new UMAX Atrsa 1220P scanner, i have no idea how to configure this in FreeBSD or Linux (or if i even can), im on 4.0-CURRENT. == Tomer Weller s...@i.am well...@netvision.net.il "Drugs are good, and if you do'em pepole think that you're cool", NoF

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Isn't it more appropriate to ask where he didn't learn to read ? :-) Poul-Henning In message , Chuc k Youse writes: > >Where did you learn to read? > >Chuck Youse >Director of Systems >cyo...@cybersites.com > > >On Tue, 11 May 1999, Josef Karthauser wrote: > >> On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:11:43

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Chuck Youse
Where did you learn to read? Chuck Youse Director of Systems cyo...@cybersites.com On Tue, 11 May 1999, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:11:43AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > tcp_extensions="NO" # Disallow RFC1323 extensions (or YES). > > No.. it's _on_ by def

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:11:43AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > Snob Art Genre wrote: > > On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dennis Glatting wrote: > > > > > In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are > > > you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in > > > TCP the

RE: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread David Schwartz
> IMO that's a good thing, because for some reason, the RFC 1323 > extensions break a lot of older terminal servers. One could argue that it's more accurate to state that the terminal servers break RFC1323, but alas the effect is the same. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Snob Art Genre
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Isn't that adequately covered by the PAWS extension from RFC 1323? > > Well, maybe it would, but > > [1:09am]~src/etc-111# grep tcp_ext defaults/rc.conf > tcp_extensions="NO" # Disallow RFC1323 extensions (or YES). > > It's off by defa

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Garrett Wollman
< As for me, I have tested the driver with Netgear cards. Works great here, > I got 470 Mbps (effective application to application) with ttcp, running > back to back on a PII-350 and a Celeron 300A (overclocked to 337, thus PCI > bus clocked at 37.5 Mhz). The limit in my case is clearly the CPU. Ho

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Peter Wemm
Snob Art Genre wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dennis Glatting wrote: > > > In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are > > you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in > > TCP the sequence numbers can wrap within timeout periods and the data > > stream

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread sthaug
> You didn't read what I said. I don't have a gigabit ethernet switch. > I only have cards. Therefore the *only* way I can test the operation > of the driver and adapters is to connect two machines with gigabit > cards back to back with a patch cable. This automatically implies 'using > gb end-to-

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Snob Art Genre
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dennis Glatting wrote: > In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are > you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in > TCP the sequence numbers can wrap within timeout periods and the data > stream become undetectably (from a TCP p

Feedback on new drivers (was: Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?)

1999-05-11 Thread Nick Hibma
There should be a more general mechanism for this. I have the same problem with the USB stuff. 100+ people on the usb-bsd mailing list and only answers to directed questions. What about, like 'HEADS-UP', a 'FEEDBACK: ' message that should invite people to send 'it works' messages. And maybe prov

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Dennis Glatting had to walk into mine and say: > In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are > you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in > TCP the sequence numbers can wrap within timeout p

Re: Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Dennis Glatting
In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in TCP the sequence numbers can wrap within timeout periods and the data stream become undetectably (from a TCP perspective) corrupt. -- Dennis Glatting Copyright (

Anybody actually using gigabit ethernet?

1999-05-11 Thread Bill Paul
I'm wondering if anybody out there has actually done any experimentation with gigabit ethernet boards using the Alteon Tigon driver. I know that it works on my hardware, but it's nice to actually have some feedback from people so that I know if it's actually working worth a damn. So far I have not

Re: Make World Fails - minor and major conflict

1999-05-11 Thread eagle
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Thomas Dean wrote: > I am running -current SMP as of last week. > > I cvsup'ed last night and started a 'Make -j12 world'. > cvsup again that should fix it. if it doesnt add my or anything else for that matter, to all occurances of the variable minor and major in that fi

Re: Tonight make world failed at isdnmonitor...

1999-05-11 Thread eagle
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > > > > I sent a patch for this about 8 hours ago. No one seems > > > to read -current. > > well it still is broken and i must of missed that patch somewhere in my > > mail, > > > > 3:58 a.m east coast time tuesday 11 > > just read mail, tested

Make World Fails - minor and major conflict

1999-05-11 Thread Thomas Dean
I am running -current SMP as of last week. I cvsup'ed last night and started a 'Make -j12 world'. tomdean ===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor cc -O2 -m486 -pipe -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/isdnmonit

Re: de driver problem

1999-05-11 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Doug Rabson wrote ... > On Sun, 9 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > As Doug Rabson wrote ... > > > On Sun, 9 May 1999, Khaled Daham wrote: > > > > > > > Hello folks > > > > > > > > I cvsupped,made world, built a kernel today and from now on the de > > > > > > Some tulip boards in alpha syst

Re: Tonight make world failed at isdnmonitor...

1999-05-11 Thread Peter Wemm
> > ===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor > > cc -Os -pipe -mpentium -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c > > /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdn > > monitor/main.c > > /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c:103: `major' redeclared as > > different kind of symbol > > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/sy

Re: SPAM

1999-05-11 Thread Bob Vaughan
here's an idea.. why not have two addresses for the list. the first would be the public address, and would be restricted to subscribers. the second would be a non-published address, which would be unrestricted, and would feed the published list via a side door. only the first list would be ope

Re: SPAM

1999-05-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Chuck Robey writes: > Garrett's points are why I sugggested that it would not be a useable > approach for -questions, newbies, and mabye hackers, 'cause they all get > a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and > committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn'

Re: Tonight make world failed at isdnmonitor...

1999-05-11 Thread Hellmuth Michaelis
> > I sent a patch for this about 8 hours ago. No one seems > > to read -current. > well it still is broken and i must of missed that patch somewhere in my > mail, > > 3:58 a.m east coast time tuesday 11 just read mail, tested Steves fix, committed. 10:23 am central european summer time tuesda

ROOTDEVNAME changes break MFS_ROOT only kernels

1999-05-11 Thread John Birrell
Prior to the ROOTDEVNAME changes, I used to build embedded kernels with MFS_ROOT and MFS_ROOT_SIZE options, plus the config line as: config foo root on wd0 but _without_ any disk devices or disk controllers. The "root on wd0" on the config line was to satisfy the config(8) syntax, but was overrid

Re: Tonight make world failed at isdnmonitor...

1999-05-11 Thread eagle
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Steve Kargl wrote: > I sent a patch for this about 8 hours ago. No one seems > to read -current. well it still is broken and i must of missed that patch somewhere in my mail, 3:58 a.m east coast time tuesday 11 rob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org wi

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c

1999-05-11 Thread Doug Rabson
On Tue, 11 May 1999, NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa wrote: > > I was thinking of doing this, the same as alpm and intpm: > > > > case 0x: > > #if NUHCI > 0 > > return NULL; > > #else > > return "VIA blah USB controller"; > > #endif > > It depends on old-config, so poor mechanism. newconfig alrea

Re: 3DNow! support?

1999-05-11 Thread Doug Rabson
On Mon, 10 May 1999, W Gerald Hicks wrote: > > > Is anyone planning on upgrading the binutils gas to a later version > > > so that we can get 3DNow! support? I'd like to use it, but I can't > > > seem to get binutils to work right manually. > > > I will update binutils when/if 2.9.2 comes out. >