[Bug 191151] [pam] Relative module path in PAM service description file does not work well

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191151 Dag-Erling Smørgrav changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Needs Triage|In Discussion Assi

[Bug 192031] New: [ctl] link_elf_obj: symbol icl_pdu_new_bhs undefined

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192031 Bug ID: 192031 Summary: [ctl] link_elf_obj: symbol icl_pdu_new_bhs undefined Product: Base System Version: 10.0-STABLE Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: Needs T

[Bug 192032] New: [PATCH] savecore(8): Distinguish getbounds() errors; don't leak a FILE*

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192032 Bug ID: 192032 Summary: [PATCH] savecore(8): Distinguish getbounds() errors; don't leak a FILE* Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any

[Bug 192035] New: [PATCH] savecore(8): Be quiet unless the user asks for verbose

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192035 Bug ID: 192035 Summary: [PATCH] savecore(8): Be quiet unless the user asks for verbose Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: An

[Bug 192036] New: [PATCH] Add error return to dumpsys(), use in doadump()

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192036 Bug ID: 192036 Summary: [PATCH] Add error return to dumpsys(), use in doadump() Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any

[Bug 192013] [xen] [pf] pf performance very bad in xen when tso enabled

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192013 Dag-Erling Smørgrav changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #144852|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug 192013] [xen] [pf] pf performance very bad in xen when tso enabled

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192013 Dag-Erling Smørgrav changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #144852|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 137307] [libc] [patch] Enhance strptime(3) to support %U and %W

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137307 Pedro F. Giffuni changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #98402|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug 137307] [libc] [patch] Enhance strptime(3) to support %U and %W

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137307 Pedro F. Giffuni changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1

[Bug 137307] [libc] [patch] Enhance strptime(3) to support %U and %W

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137307 --- Comment #2 from Pedro F. Giffuni --- (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #1) ... > I haven't tested it yet but I will. > Running test from: http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/uclibc/test/time/tst-strptime.c Results bef

[Bug 137307] [libc] [patch] Enhance strptime(3) to support %U and %W

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137307 Pedro F. Giffuni changed: What|Removed |Added CC|p...@freebsd.org | Assignee|freebsd-bu

[Bug 192010] sendbug program fails

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192010 Gavin Atkinson changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|ga...@freebsd.org -- You are rec

[Bug 192050] New: [zfs] The allowed character set for ZFS dataset names is very limited

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192050 Bug ID: 192050 Summary: [zfs] The allowed character set for ZFS dataset names is very limited Product: Base System Version: 10.0-RELEASE Hardware: Any

[Bug 192050] [zfs] The allowed character set for ZFS dataset names is very limited

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192050 Xin LI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Needs Triage|Issue Resolved CC|

[Bug 192050] [zfs] The allowed character set for ZFS dataset names is very limited

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192050 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Berg --- It's a bit confusing with the whole OpenZFS project going, but this would confirm my suspicion that illumos is still considered upstream. The upstream report, for reference: https://www.illumos.org/issue

[Bug 170320] [patch] adduser(8): usr.sbin/adduser/rmuser.sh It remains without erasing file `.*.cache'

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170320 tak...@airport.fm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved Resoluti

[Bug 170320] [patch] adduser(8): usr.sbin/adduser/rmuser.sh It remains without erasing file `.*.cache'

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170320 --- Comment #1 from tak...@airport.fm --- `mail/qpopper' specific problems, rmuser (1) is no problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@fr