https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137307
--- Comment #2 from Pedro F. Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #1) ... > I haven't tested it yet but I will. > Running test from: http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/uclibc/test/time/tst-strptime.c Results before the patch: ... strptime ("2001 20 Mon", "%Y %U %a", ...) should be: wday = 1, yday = 140, mon = 4, mday = 21 is: wday = 1, yday = 0, mon = 0, mday = 0 yearday for `2001 20 Mon' incorrect: 0 instead of 140 month for `2001 20 Mon' incorrect: 0 instead of 4 monthday for `2001 20 Mon' incorrect: 0 instead of 21 strptime ("2001 21 Mon", "%Y %W %a", ...) should be: wday = 1, yday = 140, mon = 4, mday = 21 is: wday = 1, yday = 0, mon = 0, mday = 0 yearday for `2001 21 Mon' incorrect: 0 instead of 140 month for `2001 21 Mon' incorrect: 0 instead of 4 monthday for `2001 21 Mon' incorrect: 0 instead of 21 Results after the patch: ... strptime ("2001 20 Mon", "%Y %U %a", ...) should be: wday = 1, yday = 140, mon = 4, mday = 21 is: wday = 1, yday = 139, mon = 4, mday = 20 yearday for `2001 20 Mon' incorrect: 139 instead of 140 monthday for `2001 20 Mon' incorrect: 20 instead of 21 strptime ("2001 21 Mon", "%Y %W %a", ...) should be: wday = 1, yday = 140, mon = 4, mday = 21 is: wday = 1, yday = 140, mon = 4, mday = 21 ___ So there may be a technical mismatch (GNU libc manages to reinterpret standards in amusing ways) for the %U case but the result is clearly a gain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
