kern/164132: "xptioctl: pass device not in the kernel" noise when hot swapping drives in 9.x

2012-01-14 Thread Garrett Cooper
>Number: 164132 >Category: kern >Synopsis: "xptioctl: pass device not in the kernel" noise when hot >swapping drives in 9.x >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible:freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords

Re: misc/164130: broken netisr initialization

2012-01-14 Thread Коньков Евгений
Hi, rwatson. This is unsafe to do same things in different places: 368: sysctl_netisr_dispatch_policy(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS) { char tmp[NETISR_DISPATCH_POLICY_MAXSTR]; u_int dispatch_policy; int error; netisr_dispatch_policy_to_str(netisr_dispatch_policy, tmp,

bin/164131: freebsd-update does not check for failed install commands

2012-01-14 Thread John Sellens
>Number: 164131 >Category: bin >Synopsis: freebsd-update does not check for failed install commands >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible:freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Clas

Re[2]: misc/164130: broken netisr initialization

2012-01-14 Thread Коньков Евгений
Здравствуйте, Коньков. Вы писали 15 января 2012 г., 0:00:25: КЕ> also in r49 next things are broken: КЕ> 1. in net.isr.dispatch = deferred КЕ> intr{swiX: netisr X} always have state 'WAIT' КЕ> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND КЕ>11 root 155

Re: misc/164130: broken netisr initialization

2012-01-14 Thread Коньков Евгений
also in r49 next things are broken: 1. in net.isr.dispatch = deferred intr{swiX: netisr X} always have state 'WAIT' PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 155 ki31 0K32K RUN 1 25:02 87.16% idle{idle: cpu1} 11 root 155 ki

Re: misc/164130: broken netisr initialization

2012-01-14 Thread bz
Synopsis: broken netisr initialization Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->rwatson Responsible-Changed-By: bz Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jan 14 21:26:00 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: This is in addition to emails on current@ . I think it's yours. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr

misc/164130: broken netisr initialization

2012-01-14 Thread Eugen Konkov
>Number: 164130 >Category: misc >Synopsis: broken netisr initialization >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible:freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submit

Re: conf/30399: [bsd.cpu.mk] [patch] Have Fortran use the CPUTYPE variable

2012-01-14 Thread eadler
Synopsis: [bsd.cpu.mk] [patch] Have Fortran use the CPUTYPE variable State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: eadler State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 14 15:46:36 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: per arundel http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=30399 _

Re: netisr ambigios policy

2012-01-14 Thread Коньков Евгений
Здравствуйте, Коньков. Вы писали 14 января 2012 г., 15:31:04: КЕ> From sys/net/netisr.c КЕ> switch (netisr_dispatch_policy) { КЕ> case NETISR_DISPATCH_DEFERRED: КЕ> netisr_direct_force = 0; КЕ> netisr_direct = 0; КЕ> break; КЕ>