also in r222249 next things are broken:

1. in net.isr.dispatch = deferred

intr{swiX: netisr X} always have state 'WAIT'

  PID USERNAME   PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
   11 root       155 ki31     0K    32K RUN     1  25:02 87.16% idle{idle: cpu1}
   11 root       155 ki31     0K    32K CPU0    0  25:08 86.72% idle{idle: cpu0}
   11 root       155 ki31     0K    32K CPU2    2  24:23 83.50% idle{idle: cpu2}
   11 root       155 ki31     0K    32K CPU3    3  24:47 81.93% idle{idle: cpu3}
   12 root       -92    -     0K   248K WAIT    3   0:59  6.54% intr{irq266: 
re0}
 3375 root        40    0 15468K  6504K select  2   1:03  4.98% snmpd
   12 root       -72    -     0K   248K WAIT    3   0:28  3.12% intr{swi1: 
netisr 1}
   12 root       -60    -     0K   248K WAIT    0   0:34  1.71% intr{swi4: 
clock}
   12 root       -72    -     0K   248K WAIT    3   0:27  1.71% intr{swi1: 
netisr 3}
   12 root       -72    -     0K   248K WAIT    1   0:20  1.37% intr{swi1: 
netisr 0}
    0 root       -92    0     0K   152K -       2   0:30  0.98% kernel{dummynet}
   12 root       -72    -     0K   248K WAIT    3   0:13  0.88% intr{swi1: 
netisr 2}
   13 root       -92    -     0K    32K sleep   1   0:11  0.24% 
ng_queue{ng_queue3}
   13 root       -92    -     0K    32K sleep   1   0:11  0.10% 
ng_queue{ng_queue0}
   13 root       -92    -     0K    32K sleep   1   0:11  0.10% 
ng_queue{ng_queue1}


2. There is no cpu load differences between dispatch methods. I have
tested two: direct and deferred (see on picture)

http://piccy.info/view3/2482121/cc6464fbe959fd65ecb5a8b94a23ec38/orig/

'deferred' method works same as 'direct' method!


_______________________________________________
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to