On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a fcl-web based embedded FPC HTTP web server inside a GUI
application (HTTP port 9000). I then try and access that web server via
http://127.0.0.1:9000/mmaths/login.cgi but under Windows Vista
and Windows 7, the web browser sim
Hi,
I'm running a fcl-web based embedded FPC HTTP web server inside a GUI
application (HTTP port 9000). I then try and access that web server
via http://127.0.0.1:9000/mmaths/login.cgi but under Windows Vista
and Windows 7, the web browser simply says "Website found. Waiting for
reply..."
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Regards, - Graeme -
On Monday 28/10/2013 at 11:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Damn windows Firewall :(
That's what I thought too... but maybe I was wrong. My bad!
Does the request arrive at all in the webserver app ? i.e. d
Bart wrote:
On 10/27/13, Marco van de Voort wrote:
For windows there is winutils.iswindowsadmin(), for unix likes there is
fpgeteuid (which should return zero for root).
Thanks a lot.
Also remember unix-style capabilities.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions
On 20/10/2013 13:27, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 01:56 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> Trying to create dos cross compiler using FPC trunk x86 r25833, Windows
> Why are you using
>
> OPT=-gw2 -gl
>
> I'm not sure these work at all. Debugging info for i8086 is not
> implemented and whe
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> Yes and how I still use D7 at work I still have this problem.
> This problem happen not only for unit names but component names too. I
> can not register two components with the same name.
> So, because that, programmers around the world u
Hello,
I'm needing to create a own HTTPS server. Googling, I found Powtils(*),
with three servers: lightwebserver, lightwebserver2 or lightwebserver3.
So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
(*) - https://code.google.com/p/powtils
Thank you!
ps. Issue posted in: https://code.goo
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, silvioprog wrote:
Hello,
I'm needing to create a own HTTPS server. Googling, I found Powtils(*), with
three servers: lightwebserver, lightwebserver2 or
lightwebserver3.
So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
None, IMHO.
After I looked at their code, I
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Dmitry Boyarintsev
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> Yes and how I still use D7 at work I still have this problem.
>> This problem happen not only for unit names but component names too. I
>> can not register two components wit
> My more fresh example is:
I have, for years, many units that have the prefix 'M'. So I have
MClasses, MCore, MTasks, MSystem, etc.
Now MSEgui (by Martin Schreiber) introduced a mclasses unit -- your
own implementation of classes unit -- and I can not use both units in
the same project. :(
Namesp
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, leledumbo wrote:
>> My more fresh example is:
> I have, for years, many units that have the prefix 'M'. So I have
> MClasses, MCore, MTasks, MSystem, etc.
> Now MSEgui (by Martin Schreiber) introduced a mclasses unit -- your
> own implementation of classes unit --
2013/10/28 Michael Van Canneyt
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, silvioprog wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I'm needing to create a own HTTPS server. Googling, I found Powtils(*),
>> with three servers: lightwebserver, lightwebserver2 or
>> lightwebserver3.
>>
>> So, which one is recommended to be used in production
On 10/28/2013 01:19 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 20/10/2013 13:27, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
On 10/20/2013 01:56 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Trying to create dos cross compiler using FPC trunk x86 r25833, Windows
Why are you using
OPT=-gw2 -gl
I'm not sure these work at all. Debugging inf
On Monday 28 October 2013 13:10:04 Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
> > I have, for years, many units that have the prefix 'M'. So I have
> > MClasses, MCore, MTasks, MSystem, etc.
> > Now MSEgui (by Martin Schreiber) introduced a mclasses unit -- your
> > own implementation of classes unit -- and I can
On 10/28/13, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>> For windows there is winutils.iswindowsadmin(), for unix likes there is
>>> fpgeteuid (which should return zero for root).
>>
>
> Also remember unix-style capabilities.
>
Care to elaborate on that?
Bart
___
fp
So, what you're looking for is to change a "unit search priority" for a
specific units compiled:
// use a unit.
-Fu/path/mse/msegui.pas
// set the units search priority path
-Fs/path/mse/msegui.pas@/path/mse
In that case, if MClasses is used by "msegui.pas", "Mclasses" from
/path/mse will be used
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Monday 28 October 2013 13:10:04 Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
>
>> > I have, for years, many units that have the prefix 'M'. So I have
>> > MClasses, MCore, MTasks, MSystem, etc.
>> > Now MSEgui (by Martin Schreiber) introduced a mclasses
Regards,
- Graeme -
On Monday 28/10/2013 at 11:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Damn windows Firewall :(
That's what I thought too... but maybe I was wrong. My bad!
Does the request arrive at all in the webserver app ? i.e. does the
Accept() call return ?
For some reason I was concent
Hi,
On Monday 28/10/2013 at 12:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
That can be tested easily:
Try switching off UAC, see if it works then.
If so, we'll know in what direction to look...
Unfortunately it made no difference. I disabled UAC completely,
rebooted the Win7 system. The ran the webserv
Hi, As it is written in Free Pascal wiki, order of parameter evaluation is not defined in FPC, but it is defined in Delphi (Delphi guarantees left-to-right evaluation order).However, when i compile my program with FPC in Delphi-mode (-Mdeplhi), arguments in function calls are evaluated in right-to-
On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:20, leledumbo wrote:
Namespace does NOT solve the problem. If MSE units uses M. for
their units and you have yours the same as well, you'll end up
renaming either anyway.
I would have thought that is exactly what namespaces will be handy
for! Or at least a pop
On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with
embedded HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy, tiWebServer, FPC,
nYume etc). I must agree with Michael, fphttpserv
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> I would have thought that is exactly what namespaces will be handy for! Or
> at least a popular use-case. Macros Douglas could define a "douglas"
> namespace, and the MSEide+MSEgui project could define a "msegui" namespace.
> Units, Class
> Is it much different than just extending the prefix "M" to "MFP"?
+1
> Nobody calls their units like "functions" or "functionsandprodures" (though I
> think I saw unit "funcs" one day)
I admit that I use "settings" or "config" quite often, though they're meant to
be application specific inst
On Tuesday 29 October 2013 02:48:33 Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
>
> P.S. Offtopic: I personally find it horrible to call a unit "classes" (it's
> fine for RTL, since it's started this way, but any other library - it is
> horrible). Nobody calls their units like "functions" or
> "functionsandprodures"
> And is there any way to force left-to-right parameter evalution order?
Evaluate the parameter separately from the function call, in your expected
order.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Argument-evaluation-order-in-Free-Pascal-and-Delphi-tp571
26 matches
Mail list logo
