On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Martin Schreiber <mse00...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday 28 October 2013 13:10:04 Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote: > >> > I have, for years, many units that have the prefix 'M'. So I have >> > MClasses, MCore, MTasks, MSystem, etc. >> > Now MSEgui (by Martin Schreiber) introduced a mclasses unit -- your >> > own implementation of classes unit -- and I can not use both units in >> > the same project. :( >> >> So was the issue fixed? >> I'd suggest to renamed your MClassess to MDgClasses or not to use MSEgui at >> all. > > I am strongly against this last solution. ;-) > >> The best approach here is to rename only 1 collision at a time - at >> least this is what I would do. The fix is pretty easy - renaming the file >> itself and all uses section of units that are using it. (prevents updating >> to D2010 for namespaces) >> >> I doubt that Martin would agree to rename his MClasses to MSEClasses, since >> more people is using the library (that's my guess). >> > There is a mseclasses unit in MSEgui already. The "mse" prefix is used for > MSEgui units, "m" prefix is used for forked FPC units. Maybe it should be > changed to "mfp" or the like. Marcos, what do you think? FPC AFAIK does not > support unit alias option so it will break existing code.
The "mfp" prefix sounds good for me. :-) I guess don't exist a framework around the world that uses this prefix... until now. ;-) Regards, Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
