On this page:
http://www.freepascal.org/future.var
this is mentioned:
Planned for later versions
...
LLVM backend support
Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble
believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line
perhaps be removed.
Oh, and lazarus.fre
On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On this page:
http://www.freepascal.org/future.var
this is mentioned:
Planned for later versions
...
LLVM backend support
Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble
believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should t
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 08:08 +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 27-5-2013 21:24, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 14:44 +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> > Can you try with r24625?
>
> Thanks, that seems to fix that problem for Windows.
>
> Some more things though:
> - $(fp
On 28-5-2013 22:02, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 08:08 +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> On 27-5-2013 21:24, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 14:44 +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>> Can you try with r24625?
>>
>> Thanks, that seems to fix that problem
On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble
>> believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line
>> perhaps be removed.
>
> Where in the discussions did we mention th
On 29.05.2013 06:25, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote:
On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble
believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line
perhaps be removed.
Where
