Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Feb 2010, at 19:37, JoshyFun wrote:
z := iff(a=b,1,2);
But to me it looks awful and a bit of c-ism
No, that is a VB-ism. A C-ism would be:
z = (a==b ? 1 : 2);
Which I fo tend to use myself in c# as it is a lot more convenient in
some cases.
__
Can someone please let me know where i need to put the complier
ption -WB0040 to solve the 64 bit debug issue in lazarus ?
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 10:00 PM
Subject: fpc-pascal Digest, Vol 68, Issue 28
Send fpc-pascal mailing list submi
Justin Smyth wrote:
> Can someone please let me know where i need to put the complier
> ption -WB0040 to solve the 64 bit debug issue in lazarus ?
Project > Compiler Options > Other tab. Enter you extra compiler options in
the memo box.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
It also proves that such solution external to the language is possible. That
weakens the case for a language feature
My point exactly! The language doesn't need such a feature because your
editor of choice should be able to do that, a
Marco van de Voort wrote:
IMHO Prism is not even Delphi. Just recycling of the brand.
Laying cards on the proverbial table, I don't think it was ever intended
to be Delphi. RemObjects developed the compiler completely outside of
Delphi for a number of years before the technology was licens
> The syntax that Prism uses is a lot cleaner in many respects - especially
> removing the "procedure"/"function" conundrum and using instead "method".
> However, in other ways it is horrible and so I can also see why it is not
> something worth discussing further.
Matt,
I am no Prism fan (I pref
On 22 Feb 2010, at 14:35, Anthony Walter wrote:
The syntax that Prism uses is a lot cleaner in many respects -
especially
removing the "procedure"/"function" conundrum and using instead
"method".
However, in other ways it is horrible and so I can also see why it
is not
something worth dis
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Maybe this discussion could be moved to the fpc-other list? It's not
really directly applicable to FPC anymore.
Indeed, which is why I said "[..] I can also see why it is not something
worth discussing further." I guess if someone was committing to
developing the compiler m
In our previous episode, Matt Emson said:
> >> It also proves that such solution external to the language is possible.
> >> That
> >> weakens the case for a language feature
> >>
> >
> >
> > My point exactly! The language doesn't need such a feature because your
> > editor of choice should be
In our previous episode, Matt Emson said:
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > IMHO Prism is not even Delphi. Just recycling of the brand.
>
> Laying cards on the proverbial table, I don't think it was ever intended
> to be Delphi. RemObjects developed the compiler completely outside of
> Delphi for
On Sat 20 Feb 2010, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
>
> > y := case Other of
> > bla : 'hello';
> > foo : 'bye';
> > baz : 'adius';
> >end;
>
> What do you gain with this?
> Doesn't look much different to
>
> case Other of
>bla : y := 'hello';
>foo : y := 'bye
11 matches
Mail list logo
