> The syntax that Prism uses is a lot cleaner in many respects - especially > removing the "procedure"/"function" conundrum and using instead "method". > However, in other ways it is horrible and so I can also see why it is not > something worth discussing further.
Matt, I am no Prism fan (I prefer native code). Having said that, would you care to explain the other ways in which it is horrible? Curious _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
