Peter Vreman wrote:
> There is only one correct solution: Fix the building of the 2.0.4 by
> looking up the correct syscall in the C headers.
>
> Forget about old stable releases like 2.0.2, only work with current svn
> (2.0.4 or 2.1.1).
The only thing that bothers me here is that while this is
On 3 aug 2006, at 11:11, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Forget about old stable releases like 2.0.2, only work with
current svn
(2.0.4 or 2.1.1).
The only thing that bothers me here is that while this is the
correct solution
it might not be possible. With the major caveat that I'm a beginner
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Look up the syscall_nr_exit_group (the number for exit_group syscall) for
> sparc and
> add it to rtl/linux/sparc/sysnr.inc and try to compile again.
>
> This syscall was not used in fpc 2.0.2, but was added afterwards. You might
> find
> more of those.
Thanks. I'll f
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
>> Look up the syscall_nr_exit_group (the number for exit_group syscall)
>> for sparc and
>> add it to rtl/linux/sparc/sysnr.inc and try to compile again.
>>
>> This syscall was not used in fpc 2.0.2, but was added afterwards. You
>> might find
>> more of those.
>
> Than
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> > The only thing that bothers me here is that while this is the
> > correct solution
> > it might not be possible. With the major caveat that I'm a beginner
> > at this but
> > I've demonstrated that 2.0.0 can't compile 2.0.2, and I suspect
> > that once I've
> > fixed the mis
Mark Morgan Lloyd schreef:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
The only thing that bothers me here is that while this is the
correct solution
it might not be possible. With the major caveat that I'm a beginner
at this but
I've demonstrated that 2.0.0 can't compile 2.0.2, and I suspect
that once I've
fixed the m
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>> > The only thing that bothers me here is that while this is the
>> > correct solution
>> > it might not be possible. With the major caveat that I'm a beginner
>> > at this but
>> > I've demonstrated that 2.0.0 can't compile 2.0.2, and I suspect
>>
Peter Vreman wrote:
> 2.0.4 (and also the current 2.1.1) can still be build by 2.0.0.
Sure- on an Intel platform.
Running on i386- I've just had another session and can confirm that 2.0.2 can
build both its own sources and those of 2.0.4, so my earlier problem was
definitely something to do with
OK, 4x calls missing as below
1 1>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal/src/fpcsrc/rtl/linux/sparc$ diff -u sysnr.inc~
sysnr.inc
--- sysnr.inc~ 2006-02-15 07:19:26.0 +
+++ sysnr.inc 2006-08-03 13:49:10.0 +
@@ -207,14 +207,14 @@
syscall_nr_setpgid = 185 ; // Common
On 3 aug 2006, at 16:10, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
As discussed earlier I was starting off with the released 2.0.0
compiler. Source
files from fpcbuild_2_0_4_rc2.zip downloaded about 24 hours ago-
I've got
limited free bandwidth here.
I can reproduce the problem under SPARC/Solaris. I'll t
Hi,
How do I do the following using FPC with Makefile's or a Lazarus Package?
I have a TGfxCanvas abstract class (something like the TFPCustomCanvas
class in the graphics.pp unit) and it gets implemented differently for
different platforms. Currently Win32 and X11, but others will follow
later.
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> I can reproduce the problem under SPARC/Solaris. I'll try to get at
> least that one compiling (don't have access to a sparc/linux machine)
> and commit the needed patches.
Thanks, every bit helps. I'm hoping to look at Solaris at some point but I've
only got v8 running here
On 3 aug 2006, at 17:14, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Thanks, every bit helps. I'm hoping to look at Solaris at some
point but I've
only got v8 running here at present- I'm hoping there'll be a v10
with the new
machines.
Don't bother with Solaris in 2.0.x, it won't work at all. None of the
Apologies! That unit came from a different project (LPTK) and not
Lazarus. To many files open at once in the editor.
Regards,
Graeme
On 8/3/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
> I don't want to use IFDEF's in my code if possible. A bad example is
> th
Hello!
You (Пётр Косаревский с mail.ru
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote about "Re[2]: Minor
issue compiling FPC from sources [fpc-pascal]" on 08/3/2006 at 00:16:
ПК> Well, there is a system command "echo" under windows, there is "echo"
ПК> program in "cygwin" (so, I guess it is present in most uni
15 matches
Mail list logo
