Jonas Maebe wrote: > > The only thing that bothers me here is that while this is the > > correct solution > > it might not be possible. With the major caveat that I'm a beginner > > at this but > > I've demonstrated that 2.0.0 can't compile 2.0.2, and I suspect > > that once I've > > fixed the missing syscall I still might be left with something that > > the existing > > compiler can't process :-( > > This is not a case of something the existing compiler cannot process, > but a platform-specific include file which was not updated while > others were. The SPARC exit_group syscall is 188 according to > http://lxr.linux.no/source/include/asm-sparc/unistd.h#L207 > > But yes, it's possible you'll find a few more things like this before > everything compiles, since the SPARC/Linux port has not been > maintained for a while.
Working on it. I know that this particular problem is not related to a compiler problem, but I've already (I think) demonstrated that the 2.0.0 compiler on SPARC has problems with the 2.0.2 sources. I've got a horrid feeling that once the missing stuff is fixed I'll hit the same problem :-( -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
