El 26/07/2017 a las 0:37, Andrew Haines via fpc-pascal escribió:
If you only want to see commits in a feed you can use this link to the
unofficial github mirror:
https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/commits/master.atom
It's synced every 15 minutes.
Thank you :-)
--
___
On 07/25/2017 01:39 PM, José Mejuto wrote:
El 25/07/2017 a las 8:33, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
Is it possible that the SVN RSS is stuck at day 21 ?
https://svn.freepascal.org/feeds/fpcsvn.rss
Yes. The post-commit script that creates the feed has been disabled
due to time-out problems.
El 25/07/2017 a las 8:33, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
Is it possible that the SVN RSS is stuck at day 21 ?
https://svn.freepascal.org/feeds/fpcsvn.rss
Yes. The post-commit script that creates the feed has been disabled due
to time-out problems.
Hello,
Will it be re-enabled ?
--
__
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, José Mejuto wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible that the SVN RSS is stuck at day 21 ?
https://svn.freepascal.org/feeds/fpcsvn.rss
Yes.
The post-commit script that creates the feed has been disabled due to time-out problems.
Michael._
In our previous episode, Bo Berglund said:
> >that release's bug-fix branch... regarding FPC that is normally named
> >"_fixes".
>
> I hade a look here:
> http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_3_0/
> there are sources
That is the 3.0 series branch from which releases are branched.
>
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:53:39 +0100, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>On 2016-04-02 19:33, Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I am wondering if the FPC release tag for 3.0.0 is ever updated with
>> the bugfixes or if it is static.
>
>As far as I'm concerned, tags should *never* move, otherwise, what's the
>point of ta
On 2016-04-02 19:33, Bo Berglund wrote:
> I am wondering if the FPC release tag for 3.0.0 is ever updated with
> the bugfixes or if it is static.
As far as I'm concerned, tags should *never* move, otherwise, what's the
point of tagging a commit. That should apply to SubVersion and Git
repos. If yo
> I am wondering if the FPC release tag for 3.0.0 is ever updated with
> the bugfixes or if it is static.
> I.e. if I want to get the bugfixes into my FPC do I have to update to
> a new tag then?
> Or is it OK just to make a svn up in the source dir?
It seems to be static, otherwise branches/
Antonio Sanguigni wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if there is a OP implementation of SVN Protocol.
I know there is a LazSvnPkg but it is basde on TProcess and
communication with SVN bin. This would be my second chance so my
question.
I would prefer a OP implementation, even if very basic li
On 04/02/2014 13:45, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 04.02.2014 11:35, schrieb Constantine Yannakopoulos:
>> I tried to compile FPC from source using FPCUP with its default
>> options using the latest trunk code but it failed to compile LCL,
>> probably due to Unicode changes. Could you tell me what is the
Current trunk versions of Lazarus should be able to build using a
current FPC development version.
But on ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/snapshots/ are only old
versions for FPC 2.7.1, 2.6.3
So I guess, that there must be any problem ...
L.
Am 04.02.2014 11:35, schrieb Constantine Yannakopoulos:
We use FPC trunk for the development of several projects and we
download it from ftp://freepascal.dfmk.hu/pub/lazarus/snapshots/
However for FPC 2.7.1, the latest build is from September. Is there
any plan to update it? Or is there a more
On 08 Mar 2009, at 13:04, John wrote:
Has anyone any idea of what that might be causing the above ?
Background:
I have had both fpc and lazarus svn working for quite a while now,
at least a year - though this is my first attempt at an update for a
while. Both local repositories were se
On 12 apr 2006, at 19:00, Sasa Zeman wrote:
This bug report cannot be submit.
It's not necessary, there are already two cases in the test suite
that show this bug.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.
Florian -
On Thursday 22 December 2005 17:46, you wrote:
> > The move from cvs to svn has been a disaster for me. There was a time that
> > desproxy would
> > circumvent the proxy of my uncooperative ISP, but the scripts which worked
> > before no longer
> > work. I tried to checkout subversio
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Bob Barry wrote:
>
>> The move from cvs to svn has been a disaster for me. There was a time
>> that desproxy would
>> circumvent the proxy of my uncooperative ISP, but the scripts which
>> worked before no longer
>> work. I tried to checkout subversion itself, and that d
Bob Barry wrote:
> The move from cvs to svn has been a disaster for me. There was a time that
> desproxy would
> circumvent the proxy of my uncooperative ISP, but the scripts which worked
> before no longer
> work. I tried to checkout subversion itself, and that doesn't work either.
> But I
17 matches
Mail list logo
