Am 29.04.2012 17:50, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:38 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> Am 29.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
>>> Hi
florian@ubuntu32:~$ ldd ./test
libfprtl-2.7.1.so =>
/home/florian/./fpc/svn/rtl/units/i386-linux/libfprtl-2.7,
Interested people might want to have a look at
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12492
there are iirc still unprocessed patches in that report.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi,
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:38 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 29.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
> > Hi
> >> florian@ubuntu32:~$ ldd ./test
> >> libfprtl-2.7.1.so =>
> >> /home/florian/./fpc/svn/rtl/units/i386-linux/libfprtl-2.7,
> >
> > Actually, this output shows the bug already
Am 29.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
> Hi
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> Am 29.04.2012 15:13, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
>>> If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
>>> of executables (following unix logic of many small
Hi
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 29.04.2012 15:13, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
> > If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
> > of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you
> > have a problem.
>
> Indee
In our previous episode, Florian Kl?mpfl said:
> > make sysutils/runtime etc an external loadable library and we are
> > going to see FPC generate similar sized executables for similarly
> > sized programs.
>
> It makes them look smaller but their footprint is actually larger so
> this is exactly
Am 29.04.2012 15:13, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
> If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
> of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you
> have a problem.
Indeed, but I don't think this is the way FPC programs are typically used.
>
On 29 Apr 2012, at 15:13, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
> If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
> of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you
> have a problem.
You certainly do end up with larger executables. Whether or not this is a
If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you
have a problem.
EVERY executable will have the same code again again again, i think
libraries have been created to address exactly this issue.
about the lib
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29 Apr 2012, at 14:23, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
What would be usefull is to move the loads of code stored in
sysutils/runtime into a dll/so.
That's mainly useful if the external API of the RTL will ever stabilize, which
is certainly not the case today. Otherwis
Am 29.04.2012 14:23, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
> What would be usefull is to move the loads of code stored in
> sysutils/runtime into a dll/so.
>
> thats what makes C code look "smaller", theres a nice libc (and
> others) there that groups mostly used functions into a single
> instance,
On 29 Apr 2012, at 14:23, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
> What would be usefull is to move the loads of code stored in
> sysutils/runtime into a dll/so.
That's mainly useful if the external API of the RTL will ever stabilize, which
is certainly not the case today. Otherwise you create a dyn
What would be usefull is to move the loads of code stored in
sysutils/runtime into a dll/so.
thats what makes C code look "smaller", theres a nice libc (and
others) there that groups mostly used functions into a single
instance, while in pascal every executable replicates the very same
code for ea
On 29 Apr 2012, at 12:22, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Spent more man power into optimizer development, though some
> optimizations are hard in pascal because we assume stricter aliasing
> rules and because we don't have a volatile keyword.
At least as far as our current optimizers are concerned, no
Am 29.04.2012 11:40, schrieb ik:
> Hello,
>
> Here is something that I'm asking without really know anything about
> the subject, so please bear with me.
>
> I'ved asked few places that works with Pascal (Delphi and FPC), why
> does they use C as the infrastructure, and they all say that there is
15 matches
Mail list logo
