Am 29.04.2012 17:50, schrieb Thomas Schatzl: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:38 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote: >> Am 29.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Thomas Schatzl: >>> Hi >>>> florian@ubuntu32:~$ ldd ./test >>>> libfprtl-2.7.1.so => >>>> /home/florian/./fpc/svn/rtl/units/i386-linux/libfprtl-2.7, >>> >>> Actually, this output shows the bug already: for some reason it does not >>> link to ld.so as well. >>> I thought I had fixed that some time ago. >>> >>>> .1.so (0x008d3000) >>>> florian@ubuntu32:~$ ls -la >>>> /home/florian/./fpc/svn/rtl/units/i386-linux/libfprtl-2.7.1.so >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 florian florian 2026701 2012-04-29 15:42 >>>> /home/florian/./fpc/svn/rtl/units/i386-linux/libfprtl-2.7.1.so >>>> florian@ubuntu32:~$ ./test >>>> Hello world >>>> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-fini.c: 194: _dl_fini: Assertion `ns >>>> != 0 || i == nloaded' failed! >>> >>> And that's exactly what happens if the library is missing the reference >>> to ld.so on ubuntu ... >>> >>> I will have a look why this broke (again). >> >> Does libfprtl have to reference ld.so or the main program? >> > > iirc it is sufficient that libfprtl references it. But that error > message is just what you get if it does not. So maybe my reply was too > quick. > > I will have a try and see anyway; further thinking about it, if there > were changes to that code, the corresponding testsuite programs should > fail too, so maybe the original changes just work for some cases or > cover up the real issue.
libfprtl is generated by ppumove and not the compiler so this might be the reason. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
