On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I try your solutions and here are the results:
>
> 1.) TIP: set text buffer higher (using settextbuf) -> RESULT: procedure
> breaks later
> 2.) TIP: use flush() after writeln() -> RESULT: procedure breaks on first
> flush()
> 3.) TIP: co
On 21 jun 2007, at 19:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try your solutions and here are the results:
1.) TIP: set text buffer higher (using settextbuf) -> RESULT:
procedure breaks later
2.) TIP: use flush() after writeln() -> RESULT: procedure breaks on
first flush()
3.) TIP: convert first fl
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> You would have to test the speed of each of them separately to be able
> to say anything definitive. Like it is now, there is no indication
> that it is the float-to-text routine which is to blame.
So use sprintf in C, and the equivalent in fpc; and rerun the test.
Mi
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 15 jun 2007, at 11:44, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> > >I'm sorry, but you are not providing enough information to give any useful
> > >comments. There is no reason why a generic library would error out because
> > >certain code is "too slow". Is
On 15 jun 2007, at 11:53, Jonas Maebe wrote:
That's quite unlikely to be the case. settextbuf seldomly makes a
difference for me. Especially if you write to standard output,
which will trigger a flush after every writeln anyway.
(unless you redirect the output to a file, at least under *ni
On 15 jun 2007, at 11:44, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'm sorry, but you are not providing enough information to give
any useful
comments. There is no reason why a generic library would error out
because
certain code is "too slow". Is this a real time application on an
embedded
system or s
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 15 jun 2007, at 11:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Hi Jonas,
> >
> > > >I know, programs with a writeln() have lower performance, but I
> > > >think, printf() and writeln() must do the same. This need time to
> > > >calculate.
> > >
On 15 jun 2007, at 11:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jonas,
I know, programs with a writeln() have lower performance, but
I think, printf() and writeln() must do the same. This need time
to calculate.
But the difference between printf() and writeln() are so,
that the fpc program
On 14 jun 2007, at 12:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, programs with a writeln() have lower performance, but
I think, printf() and writeln() must do the same. This need time to
calculate.
But the difference between printf() and writeln() are so, that
the fpc program breaks wi
