On 15 jun 2007, at 11:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jonas,
I know, programs with a writeln() have lower performance, but
I think, printf() and writeln() must do the same. This need time
to calculate.
But the difference between printf() and writeln() are so,
that the fpc program breaks with errors.
What kind of errors?
It will break with an error from the library, if the procedure is
to slow.
I'm sorry, but you are not providing enough information to give any
useful comments. There is no reason why a generic library would error
out because certain code is "too slow". Is this a real time
application on an embedded system or so?
Do you know a better way to produce a fast formated output in
FreePascal.
I would use FreePascal and not gcc, but the fpc result is not
practical.
If your program depends on converting floating point numbers to
string representation as quickly as possible, I agree that FPC is not
the tool you want in this case.
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
