Re: [fpc-pascal] OT: Re: http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-07-05 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Noah Silva wrote: > I (can) and (will not) ... This interpretation is wrong. For the sentence to mean this, it would need to be worded like this: "I can, but will not ..." -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ___ fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] OT: Re: http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-07-05 Thread Noah Silva
I think it depends where you draw the implied parentheses. :) I (can and will) not ... I (can) and (will not) ... I also did a double take when I read that, but I don't think Japanese has any similar constructions. Thank you, Noah Silva 2013/6/6 Mark Morgan Lloyd > Howard Page-Cla

Re: [fpc-pascal] OT: Re: http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-06 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Howard Page-Clark wrote: On 06/06/2013 08:32, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 6-6-2013 7:52, Florian Klämpfl wrote: Reinier Olislagers schrieb: On 5-6-2013 22:02, Florian Klämpfl wrote: I'am opposed to an LLVM backend but if Jonas implements one I can and will not inf

Re: [fpc-pascal] OT: Re: http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-06 Thread Howard Page-Clark
On 06/06/2013 08:32, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 6-6-2013 7:52, Florian Klämpfl wrote: Reinier Olislagers schrieb: On 5-6-2013 22:02, Florian Klämpfl wrote: I'am opposed to an LLVM backend but if Jonas implements one I can and will not influence this :) That's cle

Re: [fpc-pascal] OT: Re: http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-06 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 6-6-2013 7:52, Florian Klämpfl wrote: Reinier Olislagers schrieb: On 5-6-2013 22:02, Florian Klämpfl wrote: I'am opposed to an LLVM backend but if Jonas implements one I can and will not influence this :) That's clear enough, thanks! Of course I meant I ca